Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Wheatley 1998.

Methods Six‐week randomised, double‐blind multicentre study
Participants In‐ and outpatients fulfilling DSM‐III‐R criteria for major depressive episode, with a score of at least 21 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐17 item (HDRS‐17) and a score of at least 2 on the HDRS‐17 item 1.
 Age range: 18‐75 years
 Exclusion criteria: bipolar disorder, depressive disorder NOS, anxiety disorder within the last 2 years, schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, schizotypal or borderline personality disorder, eating disorder within the last 2 years, epilepsy, treatment with anticonvulsive medication for seizures, alcohol or substance abuse in the previous year, post‐partum depression within 1 year after delivery, high risk of suicide, unstable medical conditions, non‐responders to antidepressant treatments, use of MAOI within 2 weeks, previous use of fluoxetine for the current episode of depression, ECT within 3 months, continuous use of benzodiazepines, pregnancy, lactation, absence of contraception.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 67 participants
 Mirtazapine: 66 participants
 Fluoxetine dose range: 20‐40 mg/day
 Mirtazapine dose range: 15‐60 mg/day
 Temazepam (20 mg) oxazepam (15 mg) and nitrazepam (5 mg) were allowed
Outcomes HDRS‐17, Clinical Global Impression (CGI), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q‐LES‐Q)
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "patients were allocated to treatment with either mirtazepine or fluoxetine, according to the centrally prepared randomisation list", no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "active medication was prepared as indistinguishable looking tablets and packaging was performed using a double dummy technique", no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Scores reported without denominators. Reason and numbers of dropouts reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Adverse events occurred in more than 5% of the sample reported. Endpoint scores not reported
Other bias High risk Quote: "supported by a clinical research grant from NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands" and this company produces mirtazapine