Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Wolf 2001.

Methods Five‐week randomised, double‐blind two‐centre study
Participants In‐ and outpatients fulfilling DSM‐III‐R criteria for major depression, with a score of at least 16 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐17 item (HDRS‐17).
 Age: over 60 years
 Exclusion criteria: serious suicidal risk, glaucoma, chronic urinary retention, prostatic hypertrophy, significant organic illness, severe organic brain disease, history of seizures, schizophrenia, hypo‐ or hyperthyroidism, history of severe allergy, known allergy to imipramine, history of less than 1 year of alcohol or drug abuse.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 10 participants
 Trimipramine: 9 participants
 Fluoxetine dose: 20 mg/day
 Trimipramine dose: 150 mg/day
Outcomes HDRS‐17, Montgomery and Asberg Scale for Depression (MADRS)
Notes This study focuses on sleep related problems
 Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "since investigators were blind with regard to treatment", no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Number and reasons for dropout reported. Scores reported without denominators
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Side effects not clearly reported. Mean endpoint scores and standard deviation reported
Other bias High risk Quote: "this work was supported by Lilly Deutschland", this company produces fluoxetine