Table 1.
Entry and baseline characteristics of study populations
Characteristic | All enrolled (N = 32) | Included in safety analysis (n = 30) | Primary efficacy populationa (n = 16) | Secondary efficacy populationb (n = 13) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age at study entry | ||||
Median (Q1, Q3) | 52 (46, 55) | 52 (46, 55) | 52 (43, 59) | 52 (46, 53) |
Female gender | ||||
N (%) | 9 (28%) | 7 (23%) | 3 (19%) | 3 (23%) |
Race/Ethnicity | ||||
White Non-Hispanic | 9 (28%) | 8 (27%) | 6 (38%) | 2 (15%) |
Black Non-Hispanic | 18 (56%) | 18 (60%) | 7 (44%) | 10 (77%) |
Hispanic | 4 (13%) | 3 (10%) | 2 (13%) | 1 (8%) |
More than one race | 1 (3%) | 1 (3%) | 1 (6%) | 0 (0%) |
IV drug history | ||||
Never used | 29 (91%) | 27 (90%) | 14 (88%) | 12 (92%) |
Previously | 3 (9%) | 3 (10%) | 2 (12%) | 1 (8%) |
Entry HIV plasma RNA | ||||
≥40 copies/mL | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (100%) |
Txt week 0 HIV plasma RNA | ||||
≥40 copies/mL | 1 (3%) | 1 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (8%) |
Baseline CD4+ T cell count (c/mm3) | ||||
Median (Q1, Q3) | 813 (618, 1,014) | 818 (635, 1,031) | 846 (662, 1,065) | 765 (635, 972) |
Baseline CD4/CD8+ ratio | ||||
Median (Q1, Q3) | 0.9 (0.7, 1.3) | 0.9 (0.7, 1.3) | 0.9 (0.7, 1.4) | 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) |
Baseline weight (kg) | ||||
Median (Q1, Q3) | 83 (68, 99) | 83 (68, 99) | 79 (64, 93) | 90 (77, 100) |
Baseline BMI (kg/m2) | ||||
Median (Q1, Q3) | 27 (23, 31) | 27 (23, 30) | 24 (22, 29) | 29 (26, 31) |
Entry ARV regimen | ||||
Non-PI, non-NNRTI (INSTI) based | 14 (44%) | 13 (43%) | 9 (56%) | 4 (31%) |
Non-PI, RPV based | 3 (9%) | 2 (7%) | 1 (6%) | 1 (8%) |
Non-PI, other NNRTI based | 15 (47%) | 15 (50%) | 6 (38%) | 8 (62%)c |
IV, intravenous; BMI, body mass index; ARV, antiretroviral; PI, protease inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; INSTI, integrase strand transfer inhibitor; RPV, rilpivirine. Baseline is the average of pre-sirolimus measurements at study weeks 0 and 12.
Includes participants who completed the full 20 weeks of sirolimus.
Includes participants who completed 6 to 16 weeks of sirolimus.
Participants in the primary efficacy population had lower efavirenz (NNRTI) use than in secondary efficacy population (38% versus 62%).