Abstract
Background
Rasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase enzyme, has potent efficacy in controlling uric acid and is widely used to prevent tumor lysis syndrome in high-risk patients owing to its low toxicity profile. However, it has been associated with a risk of anaphylaxis, especially on re-exposure, owing to its immunogenic potential.
Case presentation
A 71-year-old Japanese female diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma with a large tumor burden experienced anaphylactic shock leading to death upon initial administration of rasburicase. The pre-and postmortem examination revealed that the cause of death was a cascade of events starting with anaphylaxis-induced distributive shock leading to obstructive shock due to the collapse of the heart, which was compressed by the post-mediastinal tumor. This was further compounded by massive bleeding from the tumor and tension hemothorax, resulting in circulatory collapse.
Conclusions
Although extremely rare, rasburicase can cause fatal anaphylaxis, even on first exposure.
Keywords: Rasburicase, Anaphylaxis, Allergy, Asthma, Initial administration, Lymphoma, Shock, Fatal, Death
Background
Rasburicase, a recombinant form of urate oxidase produced by introducing and expressing the uricase gene derived from Aspergillus flavus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) strains [1], has demonstrated potent efficacy in controlling uric acid in several trials of pediatric and adult patients with hematologic malignancy [2, 3]. Although rasburicase is contraindicated in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency because of the risk of hemolysis [4, 5], its safety profile has been demonstrated in clinical trials of patients without glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Currently, with the accumulation of experience on its use, rasburicase has become widely recommended and is used as a prophylactic agent for high-risk patients (and some intermediate-risk patients) with tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) with various types of malignant tumor [6–8].
As rasburicase is a recombinant enzyme that does not naturally exist in humans, antibody production occurs at a rate of approximately 2%–10% after administration [9, 10], and regulatory authorities in Japan (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency), as well as the supplier (Sanofi K.K., Tokyo), do not recommend the re-administration for patients previously exposed owing to its unestablished safety. Although the frequency of anaphylaxis upon re-administration is reported to be 0%–6.2% [11, 12], there has only been one report of a patient with anaphylaxis upon the first administration of rasburicase [4], and there have been no case reports of fatalities due to anaphylaxis.
Herein, we report a patient with anaphylaxis following the initial administration of rasburicase leading to death. We have also reviewed relevant published reports.
Case presentation
A 71-year-old Japanese female was admitted to the hematology unit of our hospital to undergo chemotherapy for newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
She had complained of dry cough and back pain that gradually worsened over 1 month. She consulted a local doctor and underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan, which revealed a posterior mediastinal mass with a diameter of 12 cm compressing the heart (Fig. 1). She underwent a bronchoscopic biopsy at our institution 10 days before her admission and was diagnosed with stage II DLBCL not otherwise specified, with a bulky mass. She had been undergoing treatment for bronchial asthma, taking steroids orally and via inhalation, and her condition was well controlled. She had a history of drug-induced rash with ambroxol and oral third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics. She had little to no impairment in her daily activities, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1. On blood examination, lactate dehydrogenase and soluble interleukin-2 receptors showed mild elevation (379 U/L and 578.0 U/mL, respectively). All other parameters were within normal ranges.
Fig. 1.

Chest X-ray and CT scan at diagnosis. a Chest X-ray showing atelectasis of the middle and lower lobes of the right lung. b Axial computed tomography showing a posterior mediastinal mass with a diameter of 12 cm (blue arrows) compressing the heart (red arrows). CT computed tomography
Although we planned to administer polatuzumab, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (Pola-R-CHP) as the initial therapy, we decided to administer rasburicase for the prevention of TLS prior to chemotherapy, considering the large tumor burden. Immediately after rasburicase administration, the patient complained of dyspnea, and generalized erythema and wheezing were observed. Shortly thereafter, her blood pressure plummeted and became unmeasurable, and she went into cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) measures, such as chest compressions and artificial ventilation by ward physicians and nurses, were initiated. Pharmacological interventions, including adrenaline (1 mg of intramuscular followed by repetitive 1 mg of intravenous doses every 4–5 min), aggressive fluid resuscitation with 2 L of normal saline, steroids, and antihistamines, were also administered. However, it took 20 min to achieve recovery of the self-circulation. Subsequently, CPA occurred again and recovery of the self-circulation was achieved; however, the patient remained extremely unstable, necessitating the placement of a percutaneous cardiopulmonary support device. CT revealed massive pleural effusion compressing the right lung and the heart (Fig. 2). The patient died 5 days after the administration of rasburicase despite maximal supportive care.
Fig. 2.

Chest X-ray and CT scan after resuscitation. a Chest X-ray showing atelectasis of the entire right lung and deviation of the mediastinum to the left. b Axial computed tomography showing massive fluid in the right pleural cavity. The heart had collapsed (red arrows). The yellow arrows show the devascularization catheter for percutaneous cardiopulmonary support in the inferior vena cava. The green arrows show the nasogastric tube in the esophagus. CT computed tomography
Postmortem pathological examination revealed massive hemothorax filling the right pleural cavity and crushed lymphoma of the posterior mediastinum, which was speculated to have resulted from major bleeding due to mechanical injury of the tumor by chest compressions during CPR (Fig. 3). The right lung and heart had collapsed due to hemothorax.
Fig. 3.

Gross pathological findings of the mediastinum. a The blue arrows show the crushed lymphoma in the posterior mediastinum. The green and purple arrows show the esophagus and the trachea, respectively. The black arrow shows the descending aorta. b Enlarged tumor section. Blood stains are visible on the surface of the crushed wound
Discussion and conclusions
Anaphylaxis caused by rasburicase is rare, with past reports suggesting a rate of 0%–6.2% in the setting of re-administration [8, 9], and only one case of anaphylaxis has been described upon initial administration of rasburicase [4]. The estimated lifetime prevalence of anaphylaxis, regardless of the cause, is 0.3%–5.1% [13], and its mortality is estimated at 0.5–1 per million population [14]. The mortality rate of patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis is estimated at 0.2%–2.5% [15, 16]. Although these epidemiological data must be considered in light of information bias, it is undeniable that fatal anaphylaxis following the initial administration of rasburicase is extremely rare. In the present case, despite an immediate diagnosis of anaphylaxis and immediate care from the medical staff, a fatal outcome could not be avoided, probably in large part due to the presence of the large mediastinal maas, which contributed significantly to the circulatory shock.
The cardiopulmonary pathophysiology of severe anaphylaxis involves a combination of loss of intravascular volume due to increased vascular permeability, hypotension due to vasodilation, myocardial depression, and bradycardia, resulting in cardiovascular collapse, otherwise known as distributive shock [17]. In this case, a schematic diagram of the shock cascade triggered by anaphylaxis is shown in Fig. 4. The loss of intracardiac pressure due to distributive shock (Fig. 4b) attracted obstructive shock by mechanical compression of the tumor (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, massive bleeding from the crushed tumor lead to hypovolemic shock (Fig. 4d) followed by tension hemothorax (Fig. 4e), finally resulted in irreversible cardiopulmonary collapse.
Fig. 4.

Schematic diagram of the cascade of shock and cardiopulmonary collapse. a T tumor, H heart (cardiovascular system). b Distributive shock mediated by anaphylaxis. c Obstructive shock due to defeating intracardial pressure by mechanical compression of the tumor. d Hypovolemic shock due to bleeding from the tumor. e Reinforced obstructive shock by tension hemothorax
Although there are no comprehensive reports describing the relationship between drug-induced anaphylaxis and asthma, most past clinical trials administering rasburicase have excluded patients with an apparent history of asthma from the study cohort [2–4, 9, 10, 18, 19]. Although there is no literature concerning rasburicase and asthma, Allen reported that one of six patients who developed anaphylaxis after repeated courses of rasburicase had comorbid asthma, which indicated that anaphylaxis did not occur at the initial administration [11]. Even though the safety of rasburicase in patients with asthma is not well established, in our case, it is likely that the mediastinal tumor, rather than asthma, played a more significant role in the fatal outcome. We do not believe that rasburicase should be contraindicated in all patients with an allergic predisposition given the very low risk of anaphylaxis and the benefits of preventing TLS. The appropriateness of rasburicase should be thoroughly evaluated, considering both the risk of TLS and the patient’s underlying risks.
The mechanism behind anaphylaxis to rasburicase on first exposure remains uncertain. There are reports of anaphylaxis on hepatitis B vaccination attributed to the protein derived from S. cerevisiae, the yeast used in hepatitis B vaccine and rasburicase synthesis [20]. Although the patient had no history of hepatitis B vaccination, it is possible that the patient was sensitized to this yeast. Non-IgE-mediated anaphylaxis can also occur with certain drugs on first exposure through either complement activation, MRGPRX-2 activation on mast cells, or, possibly, IgG-mediated anaphylaxis [21]. However, none of these mechanisms have been implicated in rasburicase-induced anaphylaxis.
In conclusion, although extremely rare, clinicians should consider the possibility of anaphylaxis, even with the initial administration of rasburicase. Anaphylaxis can lead to lethal outcomes when unfavorable conditions overlap.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the patient’s family for giving consent to publish the details of this case. We thank Emily Woodhouse, PhD, from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Abbreviations
- CPA
Cardiopulmonary arrest
- CPR
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- CT
Computed tomography
- DLBCL
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma
- TLS
Tumor lysis syndrome
Author contributions
YU, NK, SM, HA, SS, RM, TT, KT, KM, CK, SK, and NA were involved in the patient’s clinical management and collected the clinical and literature data. MK performed the postmortem examination and prepared the images. YU, NK, and SM wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval and consent were obtained from all involved parties prior to publication.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the next of kin to publish this case report and the accompanying images or data.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Leplatois P, Le Douarin B, Loison G. High-level production of a peroxisomal enzyme: Aspergillus flavus uricase accumulates intracellularly and is active in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1992;122(1):139–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goldman SC, Holcenberg JS, Finklestein JZ, Hutchinson R, Kreissman S, Johnson FL, Tou C, Harvey E, Morris E, Cairo MS. A randomized comparison between rasburicase and allopurinol in children with lymphoma or leukemia at high risk for tumor lysis. Blood. 2001;97(10):2998–3003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Coiffier B, Mounier N, Bologna S, Ferme C, Tilly H, Sonet A, Christian B, Casasnovas O, Jourdan E, Belhadj K, et al. Efficacy and safety of rasburicase (recombinant urate oxidase) for the prevention and treatment of hyperuricemia during induction chemotherapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of the GRAAL1 (Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte Trial on Rasburicase Activity in Adult Lymphoma) study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(23):4402–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jeha S, Kantarjian H, Irwin D, Shen V, Shenoy S, Blaney S, Camitta B, Pui CH. Efficacy and safety of rasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase (Elitek), in the management of malignancy-associated hyperuricemia in pediatric and adult patients: final results of a multicenter compassionate use trial. Leukemia. 2005;19(1):34–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Relling MV, McDonagh EM, Chang T, Caudle KE, McLeod HL, Haidar CE, Klein T, Luzzatto L, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation C. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guidelines for rasburicase therapy in the context of G6PD deficiency genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96(2):169–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Coiffier B, Altman A, Pui CH, Younes A, Cairo MS. Guidelines for the management of pediatric and adult tumor lysis syndrome: an evidence-based review. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(16):2767–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cairo MS, Coiffier B, Reiter A, Younes A, Panel TLSE. Recommendations for the evaluation of risk and prophylaxis of tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) in adults and children with malignant diseases: an expert TLS panel consensus. Br J Haematol. 2010;149(4):578–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Howard SC, Jones DP, Pui CH. The tumor lysis syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1844–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ishizawa K, Ogura M, Hamaguchi M, Hotta T, Ohnishi K, Sasaki T, Sakamaki H, Yokoyama H, Harigae H, Morishima Y. Safety and efficacy of rasburicase (SR29142) in a Japanese phase II study. Cancer Sci. 2009;100(2):357–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cortes J, Moore JO, Maziarz RT, Wetzler M, Craig M, Matous J, Luger S, Dey BR, Schiller GJ, Pham D, et al. Control of plasma uric acid in adults at risk for tumor Lysis syndrome: efficacy and safety of rasburicase alone and rasburicase followed by allopurinol compared with allopurinol alone—results of a multicenter phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(27):4207–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Allen KC, Champlain AH, Cotliar JA, Belknap SM, West DP, Mehta J, Trifilio SM. Risk of anaphylaxis with repeated courses of rasburicase: a research on adverse drug events and reports (RADAR) project. Drug Saf. 2015;38(2):183–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kobayashi S, Yasu T, Akazawa M. Survey of anaphylaxis during rasburicase re-administration in patients with hematological malignancies using a Japanese claims database. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(12):9826–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cardona V, Ansotegui IJ, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal Y, Fernandez Rivas M, Fineman S, Geller M, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Greenberger PA, Sanchez Borges M, et al. World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13(10): 100472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Turner PJ, Campbell DE, Motosue MS, Campbell RL. Global trends in anaphylaxis epidemiology and clinical implications. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(4):1169–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jeppesen AN, Christiansen CF, Froslev T, Sorensen HT. Hospitalization rates and prognosis of patients with anaphylactic shock in Denmark from 1995 through 2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(4):1143–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sugizaki C, Sato S, Yanagida N, Ebisawa M. Analysis of drug-induced anaphylaxis cases using the Japanese adverse drug event report (JADER) database—secondary publication. Allergol Int. 2023;72(4):580–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bochner BS, Lichtenstein LM. Anaphylaxis. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(25):1785–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pui CH, Mahmoud HH, Wiley JM, Woods GM, Leverger G, Camitta B, Hastings C, Blaney SM, Relling MV, Reaman GH. Recombinant urate oxidase for the prophylaxis or treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with leukemia or lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):697–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pui CH, Jeha S, Irwin D, Camitta B. Recombinant urate oxidase (rasburicase) in the prevention and treatment of malignancy-associated hyperuricemia in pediatric and adult patients: results of a compassionate-use trial. Leukemia. 2001;15(10):1505–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.DiMiceli L, Pool V, Kelso JM, Shadomy SV, Iskander J, Team VAERS. Vaccination of yeast sensitive individuals: review of safety data in the US vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS). Vaccine. 2006;24(6):703–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alvarez-Arango S, Kumar M, Chow TG, Sabato V. Non-IgE-mediated immediate drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024;12(5):1109–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
