Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 28;11:70. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00562-3

Table 1.

Consensus statements and strength

Consensus statements Strength (%)
18 Fr and 24 Fr are the recommended upper and lower cutoffs of sheath size of miniaturized PCNL (mPCNL) and standard PCNL (sPCNL), respectively 73.4
mPCNL brings less trauma over sPCNL 93.8
Less bleeding is noted in mPCNL than in sPCNL 87.5
Less pain is noted in mPCNL than in sPCNL 84.4
Nephrostomy tube is less frequently required in mPCNL than in sPCNL 85.9
Shorter hospital stay is required following mPCNL than sPCNL 84.4
The trade-off of mPCNL is a potential longer operation time when managing large stone burdens (> 4 cm) 87.5
mPCNL does not bring a higher risk of postoperative fever than sPCNL 71.9
Even though stone burden can be well weighted with stone volume, maximum stone diameter is preferred since it is the essence of convenience and easy for quality control 85.9
The stone burden is unanimously regarded as the primary criterion for deciding sheath size in PCNLs 84.4
The optimal indication for mPCNLs with < 14 Fr sheaths is 1–3 cm size stones 89.1
NCCT is the primary imaging choice before mPCNLs 92.2
General anesthesia is the most favored modality for mPCNLs, prioritizing optimal respiratory and circulatory management while minimizing patient discomfort 93.8
The prone position and supine position are the most frequently adopted positions in mPCNLs 92.2
Fluoroscopy-based guidance, either alone or combined with ultrasound, is the most recommended guidance in PCNLs 90.6
Urologists are preferred to perform the puncture rather than radiologists, provided they have received appropriate training and possess sufficient proficiency in PCNLs 93.8
One-shot dilation is the most preferred modality in mPCNLs due to its association with shorter access time and reduced radiation exposure while maintaining an equivalent complication rate 73.4
Ho:YAG laser emerges as the preferred lithotripsy in mPCNLs, either alone or in combination with pneumatic lithotripsy 76.6
Fragmentation lithotripsy technique with high-power Ho:YAG laser is preferred to low-power lasers 82.8
For stone removal in mPCNLs, the vacuum effect is the most frequently employed technique 70.3
Intraoperative serendipitously noted infection stones are not a contraindication for mPCNLs 73.4
Fluoroscopy remains the primary choice for detecting residual stones at the end of PCNLs 75.0
Tubeless PCNL is more prone to be performed in mPCNLs than in sPCNL in selected cases 70.3
Nephrostomy tube insertion depends on intraoperative findings, it can be removed within 2 d in patients following mPCNLs 79.1
A JJ stent is required at the end of PCNLs, and could be removed within 2 weeks 82.8
To assess the initial postoperative stone clearance, the recommended time for assessment is within the first postoperative week, either NCCT or KUB is available 71.9
For the conclusive stone clearance assessment, the recommended time for assessment is within postoperative 3 months, NCCT is preferred, and KUB alone is not adequate 91.5
Adequate rest and recuperation are advised after discharge, at least one week of rest is required before going back to work 76.6
Patient’s quality of life (QOL) is an important concern for both patients and urologists, regular evaluation is required, and telephone consultations are convenient and adequate for follow-up 71.9
Even though the Wisconsin stone quality of life (WISQOL) is a well-established tool for evaluating QOL in urolithiasis patients, further widespread application still requires efforts and attention from multiple parties 71.9

PCNL percutaneous nephrolithotomy, NCCT non-contrast computed tomography, KUB plain film of kidney, ureter, and bladder, JJ JJ stent, Ho:YAG Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet