Skip to main content
. 2000 Dec 1;28(23):4649–4656. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.23.4649

Table 2. Gap repair efficiency in exo1, mre11 and rad1 strains.

Relevant genotype Transformants /µg ×104 uncut pSB110 pSB110a gap repair (×10–2)b Fold increase pSB110a gap repair (×10–2)b Fold increase Gene replacement (×10–3)c Fold increase
EXO1 MRE11 RAD1 17.6 ± 2.8 24.3 ± 7.4   4.4 ± 1.3   8.2 ± 1.6  
exo1Δ 16.2 ± 0.8 46.3 ± 9.6 1.9 9.8 ± 3.0 2.2 23.1 ± 2.9 2.8
mre11Δ 4.4 ± 1.8 7.4 ± 2.8 0.3 0.41 ± 0.1 0.09 21.9 ± 7.7 2.7
mre11-H125N 19.1 ± 6.5 18.4 ± 5.4 0.8 NDd   ND  
rad1Δ 13.2 ± 3.9 16.0 ± 5.0 0.7 1.9 ± 0.8 0.4 2.6 ± 1.1 0.3
exo1Δ mre11Δ 0.9 ± 0.6 2.8 ± 1.6 0.1 0.08 0.02 ND  
rad1Δ mre11Δ 3.3 ± 1.6 4.8 ± 1.6 0.2 0.26 ± 0.03 0.06 ND  

apSB110 is ARS+; pSB101 contains no ARS element.

bGap repair frequencies were determined by the number of Ura+ Met+ transformants obtained from the gapped plasmid divided by the number of Ura+ Met+ transformants obtained from an equivalent amount of uncut pSB110 DNA.

cGene replacement frequencies were determined by the number of Met+ transformants obtained from the MET17 fragment divided by the number of Met+ transformants obtained from an equivalent amount of uncut pSB110 DNA.

dND, not determined.