Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 3;11(40):2405200. doi: 10.1002/advs.202405200

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Physicochemical properties of three nanosuspensions (F1–F3). A) Particle size, polydispersity index (PDI) and B) zeta potential of nanosuspensions. C) Representative TEM images of nanosuspensions. D,E) Physical stability of polymeric nanosuspensions (F1, F2) in the powder (D) and aqueous liquid (E) states at 25 °C. F) Shear viscosities of nanosuspensions as a function of shear rate. G) Drug content and loading efficiency of three nanosuspensions. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Significant differences were analyzed using one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test: ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, and *p < 0.05; ns: no significant difference (p > 0.05).