Skip to main content
. 2005 Jun;71(6):3014–3024. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3014-3024.2005

TABLE 2.

Phenotypes of various R. capsulatus pyrE and helC mutant strains and their derivatives

Straina Plasmida MedAb
MedA + uracilb
MedA + uracil + 5FOA (Res)b Nadid
Resc Psc Res Ps
MT1131 (wild type) None + + + + +
TJK11 [Δ(pyrE::kan)] None + + + +
pRK-PyrE-PB + + + + NDf
pRK-PyrE-PH + + + + ND
pRK-PyrESD + + + ND
pRK-PyrENde + + + ND
pCS1650#3 + + + + ND
pCS1650#4 + + + + ND
TCK1 or TCK2 [Δ(pyrE::kan) helC::pyrE]e None + +
pCS1650#3 + + ND
pCS1650#4 + + ND
pCS1530 + + + + ND +
TCK4 [Δ(pyrE::kan) helC]e None + +
pCS1650#3 + +
pCS1650#4 + +
pCS1530 + + ND +
TCK5 [Δ(pyrE::kan) ΔhelC]e None + +
a

The strains and the plasmids that they carry are described in Table 1.

b

MedA was the minimal growth medium. MedA + uracil contained 0.1 mg/ml uracil. MedA + uracil + 5FOA contained 0.1 mg/ml uracil and 0.1 mg/ml 5FOA.

c

Res and Ps indicate respiratory and photosynthetic growth conditions, respectively. +, strain was able to grow; −, strain was not able to grow.

d

The Nadi reaction was examined for the strains grown on MedA containing uracil under Res conditions. +, Nadi reaction; −, no Nadi reaction.

e

Strains TCK1 and TCK2 are phenotypically identical, although they differ genotypically. The same is true for TCK4 and TCK5 (for details see Materials and Methods).

f

ND, not determined.