Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 28;34(8):4113–4121. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04098-z

Table 2.

Diagnostic scoring system for adhesive capsulitis (Frozen shoulder)

Comorbidities Yes No
Diabete Mellitus 0.5 0
Recent Immobility/Fracture Upper Limb 0.5 0
Rotator Cuff Tear − 5 0
Tendinophaty Calcify − 5 0
Arthrosis Glenohumeral − 5 0
Neurological Disease of the Shoulder − 5 0
Effusion SAD − 5 0
Clinical Evaluation Yes No
Acute Pain 0.5 0
Chronic Pain > 1 month 1 0
Feel Better or Worse in the last 2 weeks 0 1
Range of Movement 0°–30° 30°–60° 60°–90° 90°–120° 120°–160°  > 160°
Elevation 3 2 1 0.5 0 0
Abduction 3 2 1 0.5 0 0
Intrarotation in abduction 2 1 0.5 0 0 0
Extarotation in abduction 2 1 0.5 0 0 0
Ultrasound Evaluation Yes No
RI thickening and hypervascularity 1 0
Thickening AR 1.5 0
Thickening CHL Ligament 0.5 0
Effusion of LHBT sheath 1 0

Table 1 outlines a comprehensive scoring system to assist in the diagnosis and staging of adhesive capsulitis, commonly known as frozen shoulder. The system integrates various factors including comorbidities, clinical evaluation criteria, range of motion measurements, and ultrasound findings. Each parameter is assigned a score that collectively determines the diagnosis: a total score greater than 7 indicates a definitive phase 2 diagnosis (Yes), scores between 6 and 2 suggest an uncertain status (phase 1 or phase 3), and scores less than 2 are indicative of the absence of the condition (No). Negative scores are attributed to conditions that typically rule out adhesive capsulitis, while positive scores reflect characteristics commonly associated with the condition. This scoring approach aims to provide a nuanced assessment, promoting targeted treatment strategies based on the identified phase of adhesive capsulitis