Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 28;7:26. doi: 10.1186/s42492-024-00176-5

Table 4.

Performance comparison in the second protocol between different methods via MPJPE and AMPJPE from the Human 3.6M synthetic test dataset

Millisecond 80 ms 160 ms 320 ms 400 ms 560 ms 1000 ms AMPJPE INV
Zero-velocity 24.4 45.6 78.6 91.1 110.0 138.6 93.4 -
siMLPea   23.7 42.0 81.8 99.4 132.4 176.2 111.1
STSGCNa   38.7 63.9 92.2 108.0 132.9 164.1 115.8
MMixer-3Da  16.0 33.4 66.9 80.8 101.9 130.6 84.6
LTD 16.7 33.5 65.6 79.1 100.4 133.1 84.5
PGBIG 13.3 29.5 61.6 75.3 97.2 132.0 81.7
DMGNN 15.9 31.4 60.4 72.3 92.4 126.2 78.9
MMixer-Euler 13.8 29.5 60.5 73.0 92.0 124.0 77.9
Ours 11.4 26.9 57.1 69.6 89.4 123.9 75.8

The best are highlighted in bold. aindicates the model with a simple network (parameter < 0.2 M). INV indicates whether the method possesses size and view angle invariance