Table 8.

Performance comparison between different methods using AMPJPE on various Human 3.6M

Method	Standard	View-distance	View-angle	Both	Parameter(M)
Zero-velocity	92.80	93.42	92.80	93.42	0
LTD	69.21	72.72	82.90	84.50	2.6
PGBIG	66.27	70.07	80.17	81.65	1.7
DMGNN$_{}^{\mathrm{a}}$	78.63	78.89	78.63	78.89	46.9
STSGCN	75.43	88.70	103.92	115.80	$<0.10$
MMixer-Euler$_{}^{\mathrm{a}}$	77.14	77.89	77.14	77.89	$<0.10$
MMixer-3D	72.19	75.02	83.28	84.61	$<0.10$
siMLPe	71.91	96.72	88.18	111.09	0.14
Ours	75.40	75.77	75.40	75.77	$<0.10$

The best are highlighted in bold. $_{}^{\mathrm{a}}$indicates a method that is based on 3D joint rotational angles. Standard: unprocessed dataset; View-distance: skeleton template scaling; View-angle: skeleton template rotation; Both: skeleton template scaling and rotation