Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 29;4:217. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00653-1

Fig. 3. Machine learning-based models for predicting mFARS.

Fig. 3

A mFARS predictions from Models 1 (n = 33), 2 (n = 39), and 5 (n = 32) versus the clinical scores. B The explained variance for mFARS prediction for models 1-5. C mFARS Section E predictions from Models 1 (n = 33), 2 (n = 39), and 5 (n = 33) versus the clinical scores. D The explained variance for mFARS Section E prediction for models 1, 2, 3, and 5. Model 4 was not trained for the prediction mFARS Section E as it uses sensor-derived GDM metrics.