Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 23;37(5):2324–2341. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01122-w

Table 3.

Comparison of the quantitative results of ablation experiments for each module based on the training results of 1/4 labeled data as a benchmark

Method Loss Evaluation index
LGcontra LLcontra LDice Lcons DSC (%) IoU (%) F1-score (%)
Method 1 86.58 77.85 87.25
Method 2 87.65 79.19 88.93
Method 3 87.96 79.84 88.52
Method 4 87.99 79.87 88.54
Method 5 88.07 80.14 88.69
Our method 89.25 82.13 89.77

Values in bold indicate the best experimental results