Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 30;24:1234. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06195-3

Table 2.

GRADE evidence profile of thirty-three eligible studies

Outcomes GRADE evidence
profile*
Number of participants (studies) Effect size (Cohen’s d) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Control group Intervention group
Individual coaching intervention compared to no intervention

Population: Resident physicians

Setting: Training center

Intervention: Individual coaching intervention

Comparison: No intervention

Emotional exhaustion

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low EE) to 54 (high EE) (n = 13)

 • 16-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low EE) to 30 (high EE) (n = 1)

 • 9-item aMBI, with score ranging from 0 (low EE) to 18 (high EE) (n = 2)

Serious Serious Not serious Not serious 587 (5 historical-control, 6 self-control, 5 RCT studies) 528 (5 historical-control, 6 self-control, 5 RCT studies) 0.24 lower (0.40 lower to 0.07 lower)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Depersonalization

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low DP) to 30 (high DP) (n = 13)

 • 16-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low DP) to 30 (high DP) (n = 1)

 • 9-item aMBI, with score ranging from 0 (low DP) to 18 (high DP) (n = 2)

Serious Serious Not serious Not serious 587 (5 historical-control, 6 self-control, 5 RCT studies) 528 (5 historical-control, 6 self-control, 5 RCT studies) 0.20 lower (0.41 lower to 0.01 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Individual coaching intervention compared to no intervention, continued

Personal accomplishment

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low PA) to 48 (high PA) (n = 11)

 • 16-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low PA) to 36 (high PA) (n = 1)

 • 9-item aMBI, with score ranging from 0 (low PA) to 18 (high PA) (n = 2)

Serious Serious Not serious Not serious 451 (4 historical-control, 5 self-control, 5 RCT studies) 394 (4 historical-control, 5 self-control, 5 RCT studies) 0.16 higher (0.10 lower to 0.42 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Individual meditation intervention compared to no intervention

Population: Resident physicians

Setting: Training center

Intervention: Individual meditation intervention

Comparison: No intervention

Emotional exhaustion

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low EE) to 54 (high EE) (n = 5)

 • 20-item MBI with score ranging from 0 (low EE) to 48 (high EE) (n = 1)

 • 9-item aMBI, with score ranging from 0 (low EE) to 18 (high EE) (n = 3)

Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious 250 (1 historical-control, 4 self-control, 4 RCT studies) 241 (1 historical-control, 4 self-control, 4 RCT studies) 0.33 lower (0.59 lower to 0.08 lower)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Individual meditation intervention compared to no intervention, continued

Depersonalization assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low DP) to 30 (high DP) (n = 5)

 • 20-item MBI with score ranging from 0 (low DP) to 30 (high DP) (n = 1)

 • 9-item aMBI, with score ranging from 0 (low DP) to 18 (high DP) (n = 3)

Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious 249 (1 historical-control, 4 self-control, 4 RCT studies) 241 (1 historical-control, 4 self-control, 4 RCT studies) 0.11 lower (0.34 lower to 0.11 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Personal accomplishment

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low PA) to 48 (high PA) (n = 4)

 • 20-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low PA) to 42 (high PA) (n = 1)

 • 9-item aMBI, with score ranging from 0 (low PA) to 18 (high PA) (n = 3)

Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious 233 (1 historical-control, 4 self-control, 3 RCT studies) 215 (1 historical-control, 4 self-control, 3 RCT studies) 0.21 higher (0.03 higher to 0.40 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Organizational work-hour intervention compared to no intervention

Population: Resident physicians

Setting: Training center

Intervention: Organizational work-hour intervention

Comparison: No intervention

Emotional exhaustion

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low EE) to 54 (high EE) (n = 6)

Serious Serious Not serious Serious 308 (2 historical-control, 2 self-control, 2 RCT studies) 313 (2 historical-control, 2 self-control, 2 RCT studies) 0.20 lower (0.58 lower to 0.17 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Organizational work-hour modification intervention compared to no intervention, continued

Depersonalization

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low DP) to 30 (high DP) (n = 6)

Serious Serious Not serious Serious 308 (2 historical-control, 2 self-control, 2 RCT studies) 313 (2 historical-control, 2 self-control, 2 RCT studies) 0.16 lower (0.49 lower to 0.16 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Personal accomplishment

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low PA) to 48 (high PA) (n = 6)

Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious 308 (2 historical-control, 2 self-control, 2 RCT studies) 313 (2 historical-control, 2 self-control, 2 RCT studies) 0.04 lower (0.12 lower to 0.20 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Organizational improved learning environment compared to no intervention

Population: Resident physicians

Setting: Training center

Intervention: Organizational improved learning environment intervention

Comparison: No intervention

Emotional exhaustion

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low EE) to 54 (high EE) (n = 2)

Serious Serious Not serious Serious 161 (2 historical-control studies) 148 (2 historical-control studies) 0.20 lower (0.61 lower to 0.21 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Depersonalization

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low DP) to 30 (high DP) (n = 2)

Serious Serious Not serious Serious 161 (2 historical-control studies) 148 (2 historical-control studies) 0.07 lower (0.58 lower to 0.44 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

Personal accomplishment

assessed with

 • 22-item MBI, with score ranging from 0 (low PA) to 48 (high PA) (n = 2)

Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious 161 (2 historical-control studies) 148 (2 historical-control studies) 0.28 higher (0.05 higher to 0.50 higher)

Very low

⊕⊖⊖⊖

*No studies fulfil the upward rating of evidence in large magnitude of an effect, dose-response gradient, and the effect of plausible residual confounding; no publication bias was found in all outcomes