Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 30;10(44):eado8499. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado8499

Table 1. Cryo-EM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics.

H46R fibril (EMD-35460, PDB 8IHV) G85R fibril (EMD-35459, PDB 8IHU)
Data collection and processing
Magnification 105,000 105,000
Voltage (kV) 300 300
Camera Gatan K3 (Krios G4) Gatan K3 (Krios G4)
Frame exposure time (s) 0.08 0.08
Movie frames (n) 40 40
Electron exposure (e2) 60 60
Defocus range (μm) −2.0 to −1.2 −2.0 to −1.2
Pixel size (Å) 0.84 0.84
Symmetry imposed C 1 C 1
Box size (pixel) 400 400
Interbox distance (Å) 33.6 33.6
Micrographs collected (n) 8,680 6,366
Segments extracted (n) 1,062,069 626,757
Segments after Class2D (n) 235,369 305,672
Segments after Class3D (n) 59,857 53,707
Map resolution (Å) 3.11 2.97
    FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 3.01–4.83 2.87–4.79
Refinement
Initial model used De novo De novo
Model resolution (Å) 3.11 2.97
    FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Model resolution range (Å) 3.11 2.97
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −78.38 −82.56
Model composition
    Nonhydrogen atoms 1,446 1,527
    Protein residues 207 216
    Ligands 0 0
B factors (Å2)
    Protein 81.95 52.90
RMSDs
    Bond lengths (Å) 0.005 0.005
    Bond angles (°) 0.722 0.713
Validation
MolProbity score 2.39 2.25
Clashscore 12.57 9.90
Poor rotamers (%) 0 0
Ramachandran plot
    Favored (%) 76.12 80.00
    Allowed (%) 23.88 20.00
    Disallowed (%) 0 0
    Model versus data (CC) 0.84 0.82