Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 30;132(10):107009. doi: 10.1289/EHP14418

Table 5.

Associations between each PM2.5 source factor and cognitive outcome in 9- to 10-year-old participants from the ABCD Study cohort (n=8,588), 2016–2018.

General cognitive ability Learning & memory Executive function
PM2.5 source factor b Standard error p-Value b Standard error p-Value b Standard error p-Value
Crustal 2.66×102 2.67×102 0.3202 2.66×102 2.70×102 0.8947 5.67×102 2.98×102 0.0570
Ammonium sulfates 6.19×103 4.61×102 0.8932 6.19×103 4.65×102 0.1459 1.16×101 5.14×102 0.0237
Biomass burning 8.65×103 4.90×102 0.8599 8.65×103 4.95×102 0.6586 2.92×102 5.47×102 0.5937
Traffic 1.31×102 2.69×102 0.6272 1.31×102 2.72×102 0.2193 6.00×102 3.00×102 0.0458
Ammonium nitrates 5.11×102 3.39×102 0.1324 5.11×102 3.42×102 0.0002* 2.04×103 3.79×102 0.9570
Industrial 7.65×103 3.75×102 0.8381 7.65×103 3.78×102 0.5484 3.84×102 4.18×102 0.3575

Note: Linear regression models, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, overall household income, neighborhood safety, urbanicity, physical activity, daily screentime average hours, and site. Estimates include unstandardized beta coefficients (b), standard errors, and p-values. Asterisk sign(*) reflected models passing Bonferroni correction (p0.008). PM2.5, fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter 2.5μm.