TABLE 1.
Comparative table of the most commonly used molecular markers/methods and their attributed features.
| Marker/Method | DP | Typ (%) | Reproducibility | SGI | Time | Cost | AY | MI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFLP | Good | 100 | High | Yes | A week | Expensive | Good | Co-dominant |
| AFLP | Moderate | 85–90 | High | Yes | 2-3 days | Average | Complex method | Dominant |
| RAPD | Average | 80 | Low | Yes | <1 day | Low | Good | Dominant |
| PFGE | Good | 100 | High | Yes | 3-4 days | Average | Limited | NA |
| MLST | Moderate | 80–90 | High | Yes | 1-2 days | Expensive | Limited | NA |
| RIBOTYPING | Poor | 100 | Moderate | Yes | 3-4 days | Average | Complex method | NA |
| AUTOMATIC RIBOTYPING | Good | NA | Moderate | Yes | 8 h | Expensive | Limited | NA |
| SPOLIGOTYPING | Good | 94% | Moderate | Yes | 1 day | Low | Good | NA |
| REP/ERIC/BOX PCR | Good | NA | Moderate | Yes | 1 day | Low | Good | NA |
DP, discriminatory power; Typ, Typeability (%); SGI, sensitivity to genetic instability; AY, availability; MI, marker inheritance; NA, not applicable.