TABLE 1.
Study | Surgical intervention | Risk of bias | Principal objective was compared in study | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | Summary of findings | Results | Quality | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB | Control | ||||||||||
Christoffersden et al. [12] | Post parietal repair | Not serious | Pain/seroma | Not serious | Not serious | Serious | Not serious | 28 | 28 | No clinical effect | Moderate |
Ortiz et al. [13] | Post parietal surgery | Very serious | Post operative complication (included post operative hernia) | Serious | Serious | Serious | Not serious | 21 | 19 | No clinical effect | Very low |
Paasch et al. [14] | Post parietal surgery | Not serious | Utility of AB | Not serious | Not serious | Serious | Not serious | 18 | 19 | IC95 [1; 35] p = 0.042 |
Moderate |
Clay et al. [15] | Post colorectal surgery | Serious | Respiratory function | Serious | Serious | Serious | Not serious | 23 | 25 | No clinical effect | Very low |
Karaca et al. [16] | Post cesarien | Serious | Post operative physical function | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | 45 | 44 | p = 0.001 | Moderate |
Ghana et al. [17] | Post cesarien | Serious | Post operative abdominal pain | Serious | Serious | Serious | Not serious | 89 | 89 | p < 0.001 | Very low |
Cheifetz et al. [18] | Post abdominal surgery | Very serious | Post operative physical function | Very serious | Very serious | Very serious | Not serious | 30 | 30 | p < 0.001 | Very low |
AB, abdominal binder.