TABLE 9.
Oral microbiota related to development of cancer.
| No | Studies | Outcomes | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Investigated oral microbiome composisition from mouthwash samples in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (n = 81) and esophageal squamos cell carcinoma (ESCC) (n = 25) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing | - Periodontal pathogen Tannerella forysthia higher risk of EAC - Commensal genus Neisseria and Streptococcus pneumoniae lower EAC risk - Increase Porphyromonas gingivalis in ESCC |
Peters et al. (2017) |
| 2 | Investigated oral microbiome associated with esophageal squamos cell carcinoma (ESCC) in fasting saliva samples were collected ESCC case (n = 87), dysplasia (n = 63), and healthy controls (n = 85) using 16S rRNA sequencing | - Found that decrease carriage of genera Lautropia, Bulleidia, Catonella, Corynebacterium, Moryella, Peptococcus and Cardiobacterium in ESCC subject compared non-ESCC subject are significantly associated with an increase risk of ESCC - Higher of Prevotella and Streptococcus were also observed in the ESCC group compared to non-ESCC groups |
Chen et al. (2015) |
| 3 | Investigated in case control study the relationship of oral microbiota with subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer from oral wash sampel adenocarcinoma pancreas (n = 361) and controls (n = 371) using bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing | - Oral pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans associated with higher risk of pancreatic cancer - Higher relative abundance of the phylum Fusobacteria and genus Leptotrichia associated decreased pancreatic cancer risk |
Fan et al. (2018) |
| 4 | Cohort studies oral microbiota increase risk pancreatic cancer from saliva of patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 10) and healthy controls (n = 10) using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) | - The levels of N. elongata and S. mitis singnificantly decrease in patients with pancreatic cancer than healthy controls an ROC-plot AUC value of 0.90 with 96.4% sensitivity and 82.1% specificity - The level of G. adiacens significantly elevated in patients with pancreatic cancer relative to all non-cancer subjects an ROC-plot AUC value of 0.70 with 85.7% sensitivity and 55.6^ specificity |
Farrell et al. (2012) |
| 5 | Characterization salivary microbiome in patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 8), other disease (n = 78), and healthy controls (n = 22) using 16S rRNA sequencing | - Found that significantly higher ratio of Leptotrichia to Porphyromonas in the saliva patients pacreatic cancer that healthy patients or patients with other disease (p < 0.0001) - Meanwhile, found that lower non significant relative abundances of Neisseria and Aggregatibacter in saliva of pancreatic cancer patients (p < 0.05) |
Torres (2015) |
| 6 | Characterization oral microbiome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 273) and healthy controls (n = 285) extracted from saliva samples using 16S rRNA gene was PCR amplified | - No association were detected for alpha diversity with pancreatic cancer also indication associations between specific taxa and pancreatic cancer - Increasing relative levels of Haemophilus associated with decreased odds of pancreatic cancer, while found of Enterobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae G7, Bacteroidaceae or Staphylococcaceae associated with increased odds of pancreatic cancer - Found the association between pancreatic cancer and the microbioal community composition (i.e., beta diversity) |
Vogtmann et al. (2020) |
| 7 | Characterization oral microbiota in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 40), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (n = 39), and controls (n = 58) provided saliva sample surveyed by sequencing of the 16S rRNA microbial genes | - PDAC cases found higher levels of Firmicutes and related taxa (Bacilli, Lactobacillales, Streptococcaceae, Streptococcus, Streptococcus thermophilus) compared to controls - Gammaproteobacteria, Pasteurellales, Pasteurellaceae, Haemophilus, Haemophilus parainfluenzae; and Betaproteobacteria, Neisseriales, Neisseriaceae, Neisseria, Neisseria flaviscens has lower in PDAC but higher levels in controls - The PDAC and IPMN groups very similar in measures of alpha diversity of the oral microbiota |
Olson et al. (2017) |
| 8 | Reveal the bacterial composisiton in the microbiota of tongue coating in pancreatic head carcinoma (n = 30) and healthy controls (n = 25) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology | - In patient with pancreatic head carcinoma overpresented microbiota than healty controls such as Leptotrichia, Fusobacterium, Rothia, Actinomyces, Corynebacterium, Atopobium, Peptostreptococcus, Catonella, Oribacterium, Filifactor, Campylobacter, Moraxella and Tannerella
- Meanwhile in healthy controls increasing microbiome such as Haemophilus, Porphyromonas, and Paraprevotella |
Lu et al. (2019) |
| 9 | Deep sequencing using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) reveals microbiota dysbiosis of tongue coat in patient with liver carcinoma (n = 35) and healthy subjects (n = 25) | - Fusobacterium and Oribacterium increase in liver carcinoma than healthy subjects | Lu et al. (2016) |
| 10 | Variations of salivary microbiota association in patient with lung cancer ((n = 20) including squamos cell carcinoma (SCC) (n = 10) and adenocarcinoma (AC) (n = 10) and control subjects (n = 10) using 16S sequencing analysis | - Two bacterial including Capnocytophaga sp., Veillonella sp. distinguishing with SCC from control subjects ROC value 0.86 with 84.6% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity. In patients with AC distinguishing from control subjects with ROC value 0.80, sensitivity 78.6%, and specificity 80% | Yan et al. (2015) |
| 11 | Identified bacteria biomarkers associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) from salivary sample healthy individuals (n = 51) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (n = 197) using 16S rRNA squencing | - Fusobacteria increased significantly with the progression of oral cancer from the healthy controls (2.98%) to OSCC stage 1 (4.35%) through stage 4 (7.92%) - Fusobacterium periodonticum, Parvimonas micra, Streptococcus constellatus, Haemophilus influenza, and Filifactor alocis associated with OSCC, and progressively increased in abundance from stage 1 to stage 4 |
Yang et al. (2018) |
| 12 | Revealed salivary microbiome compositions in patients from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 39) compared with healthy controls (n = 20) using 16S rRNA sequencing | - Phylum Firmicutes and two genera Streptococcus and Veillonella increase in NSCLC patients compared with controls | Zhang et al. (2019) |
| 13 | Case-control study oral rinse DNA sample from 190 patient with colorectal cancer used to amplify V3-V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA gene | - Increased genus of Lactobacillus and Rothia in patient with cancer colorectal | Kato et al. (2016) |
| 14 | Investigated alteration oral microbiome linked with colorectal cancer from oral swabs, colonic mucosae and stool in individuals with colorectal cancer (n = 99), colorectal polyps (n = 32), and controls (n = 103) than sequencing using 16S rRNA gene amplicon | - An increase several ral taxa was found in colorectal cancer compared with control such as Streptococcus and Prevotella spp. | Flemer et al. (2018) |
| 15 | Case-control study examined the salivary microbiome in patients with digestive tract cancer (n = 59) and control subjects (n = 118) then sequencing using 16S rRNA gene | - Actinomyces odontolyticus, Steptococcus parasinguinis, Corynebacterium spp., Neisseria sspp.,TM7[G-1] sp., Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Neisseria elongata and Streptococcus sanguinis was more abundant in the saliva of digestive tract cancer compared with in control subjects | Kageyama et al. (2019) |
| 16 | Investigate the characteristics of oral microbiome in gastric cancer from plaques and saliva samples including individuals with gastric cancer (n = 37) and controls (n-13) then sequencing by 16S rRNA gene amplicons | - Overall increased microbial diversity in cancer patients - Oral bacteria are more complex in patients with gastric cancer than the control populations - One of the strongest risk factors for gastric cancer is detection rate of H. pylori |
Sun et al. (2018) |