Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 23;56(10):2046–2053. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01910-8

Extended Data Fig. 4. De novo or autosomal recessive attributable fraction in different subsets of probands.

Extended Data Fig. 4

Fraction of patients in different groups attributable to de novo versus autosomal recessive coding variants [(observed-expected)/N]. The patients are split by (a) level of consanguinity (N = 1,087 and 24,436 for low and high consanguinity respectively), (b) cohort (N = 7,919 and 17,604 for DDD and GeneDx respectively), (c) diagnostic status (N = 8,494 and 17,029 for diagnosed and undiagnosed respectively) or (d) sex (N = 11,316 and 14,207 for female and male respectively). The bars show the attributable fraction estimates within the groups, and error bars show 95% confidence intervals.