. 2024 Oct 25;32:e4394. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7374.4395

Table 3. - Comparison of the overall score on the RIPLS* and JeffSATIC ^† scales according to preceptors and residents of the same profession. Florianópolis, SC, Brazil, 2023 .

	*RIPLS dimensions**			Score
Profession	Fac 1 ^‡	Fac 2 ^§	Fac 3 ^\|\|	RIPLS*	JeffSATIC ^†
NUR ^¶
Preceptors	61.0 [45.0 – 67.0]	32.0 [24.0 – 39.0]	22.0 [16.0 – 25.0]	113.0 [96.0 – 130.0]	129.0 [100.0 – 140.0]
Residents	60.0 [54.0 – 66.0]	32.0 [23.0 – 36.0]	22.5 [17.0 – 25.0]	118.0 [95.0 – 125.0]	131.5 [112.0 – 140.0]
P value**	0.575	0.320	0.884	0.417	0.322
PHA ^††
Preceptors	60.0 [54.0 – 69.0]	31.0 [27.0 – 34.0]	22.0 [18.0 – 25.0]	111.0 [105.0 – 122.0]	126.0 [111.0 – 137.0]
Residents	60.0 [51.0 – 66.0]	30.0 [26.0 – 34.0]	23.0 [18.0 – 25.0]	112.0 [101.0 – 125.0]	122.0 [108.0 – 134.0]
P value**	0.930	0.596	0.479	0.930	0.536
PHY ^‡‡
Preceptors	61.0 [56.0 – 66.0]	31.0 [28.0 – 37.0]	23.5 [20.0 – 25.0]	117.5 [107.0 – 123.0]	130.0 [110.0 – 140.0]
Residents	64.5 [63.0 – 66.0]	32.0 [30.0 – 34.0]	22.5 [20.0 – 25.0]	119.0 [113.0 – 125.0]	129.0 [124.0 – 134.0]
P value**	0.400	0.711	1.000	0.533	1.000
SPE ^§§
Preceptors	58.0 [51.0 – 66.0]	31.0 [27.0 – 33.0]	23.0 [20.0 – 25.0]	112.0 [106.0 – 122.0]	124.0 [120.0 – 137.0]
Residents	64.0 [64.0 – 65.0]	35.0 [29.0 – 35.0]	24.0 [23.0 – 24.0]	122.0 [117.0 – 124.0]	134.0 [133.0 – 139.0]
P value**	0.064	0.373	0.373	0.018	0.036
NUT ^\|\|\|\|
Preceptors	56.0 [43.0 – 66.0]	29.5 [27.0 – 25.0]	22.5 [19.0 – 25.0]	110.0 [89.0 – 119.0]	123.0 [111.0 – 135.0]
Residents	64.0 [59.0 – 66.0]	31.0 [29.0 – 35.0]	25.0 [21.0 – 25.0]	120.0 [116.0 – 123.0]	133.0 [122.0 -140.0]
P value**	0.004	0.442	0.082	0.001	0.037
DEN ^¶¶
Preceptors	60.5 [58.0 – 66.0]	31.0 [29.0 – 33.0]	21.5 [20.0 – 23.0]	112.5 [109.0 – 121.0]	124.0 [118.0 – 131.0]
Residents	60.0 [55.0 – 61.0]	32.0 [30.0 – 34.0]	25.0 [20.0 – 25.0]	114.0 [110.0 – 118.0]	139.0 [133.0 – 140.0]
P value**	0.629	0.629	0.400	0.857	0.057
PSY***
Preceptors	63.0 [49.0 – 66.0]	32.5 [29.0 – 35.0]	24.0 [21.0 – 25.0]	119.0 [103.0 – 123.0]	127.0 [116.0 – 138.0]
Residents	61.0 [57.0 – 66.0]	31.0 [27.0 – 37.0]	23.0 [20.0 – 25.0]	113.0 [109.0 – 128.0]	126.0 [117.0 – 135.0]
P value**	0.173	0.314	0.468	0.223	0.756
SOC ^†††
Preceptors	60.00 [49.0 – 66.0]	28.0 [22.0 – 35.0]	23.0 [20.0 – 25.0]	109.0 [98.0 – 125.0]	125.0 [109.0 – 140.0]
Residents	60.0 [55.0 – 66.0]	28.0 [26.0 – 33.0]	23.0 [19.0 – 25.0]	115.0 [100.0 – 124.0]	130.0 [111.0 – 139.0]
P value**	0.733	0.733	0.820	0.361	0.569

RIPLS = Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale

^{^†}

JeffSATIC = Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Collaboration

^{^‡}

Fat 1 = Fator 1

^{^§}

Fat 2 = Fator 2

^{^||}

Fat 3 = Fator 3

^{^¶}

NUR = Nursing

^**

Mann Whitney U test

^{^††}

PHA = Pharmacy

^{^‡‡}

PHY = Physiotherapy

^{^§§}

SPE = Speech Therapy

^{^||||}

NUT = Nutrition

^{^¶¶}

DEN = Dentistry

^***

PSY = Psychology

^{^†††}

SOC = Social Service

Table 3. - Comparison of the overall score on the RIPLS* and JeffSATIC † scales according to preceptors and residents of the same profession. Florianópolis, SC, Brazil, 2023 .

Table 3. - Comparison of the overall score on the RIPLS* and JeffSATIC ^† scales according to preceptors and residents of the same profession. Florianópolis, SC, Brazil, 2023 .