Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuromodulation. 2020 Feb 14;23(3):301–311. doi: 10.1111/ner.13108

Table 1.

Data Extraction From Included Studies.

Study Participants Intervention Sham control? Stimulation
parameters
Primary outcome Minimum abstinence Craving mean (SD)*
Intervention Control
Pre- Post- Pre- Post-
Shen, 2016 20 heroin-using males TMS Y L DLPFC, 10 Hz, 100% RMT, 2000 pulses, 5 sessions Cue-induced craving unknown 60 (11.2) 25 (9.2) 62 (9.5) 55 (9.2)
Wang, 2016 20 individuals with history of OUD tDCS Y BL occipital lobes (anodal) and BL FTP areas (cathodal), 1.5 mA, 20 min, 1 session Cue-induced craving 1.5-2 y 68 (8.4) 43 (7.6) 62 (5.5) 62 (5.5)
Shen, 2017 12 heroin-using males and 12 healthy controls TMS N L Primary Motor Cortex, 10 Hz, 90% RMT, 2000 pulses, 1 session MEP 2 weeks - - - -
Miranda, 2018 73 outpatients with OUD transitioning to MAT BRIDGE N Dorsal and ventral aspects of the ear to vagus nerve, 3.2 V, “alternating frequencies,” 1–5 sessions Withdrawal symptoms unknown 20.1 (6.1) 3.1 (3.4) - -
Study Participants Intervention Sham control? Stimulation parameters Primary outcome Last use? Craving change from baseline (SD)
Sahlem, 2017 Nontreatment-seeking opioid users TMS Y L DLPFC, 10 Hz, 110–120% RMT, 3000 pulses, 1 session Cue-induced craving unknown −1.7 (1.5) 0.9 (0.1)
*

Cue-induced craving was rated on a scale of 0 to 100.

Cue-induced craving was rated on a scale of 0 to 10.