Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Mar 12;54(8):1187–1195. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis015

Table 1.

Concordance Between DBS, DPS, and Plasma Specimens in Identifying Virological Failure

Plasma Specimens
Specimen Type and VL, copies/mL VL ≥1000 Copies/mL VL <1000 Copies/mL Total κ Value, Mean ± SE (95% Confidence Interval) P Performance of DBS and DPS Specimens, %a

DBS 0.78 ± 0.08 (0.62–0.94) <.001 Sensitivity, 77.8; specificity, 98.1; PPV, 82.3; NPV, 97.4
 ≥1000 14 3 17
 <1000 4 152 156
 Total 18 155 173
DPS 0.83 ± 0.07 (0.69–0.98) <.001 Sensitivity, 77.8; specificity, 99.4; PPV, 93.3; NPV, 97.5
 ≥1000 14 1 15
 <1000 4 154 158
 Total 18 155 173

Viral failure was defined as plasma viral RNA levels ≥1000 copies/mL.

Abbreviations: DBS, dried blood spot; DPS, dried plasma spot; NPV, negative predictive value, PPV, positive predictive value; SE, standard error; VL, viral load.

a

PPV and NPV were calculated using a 10.4% prevalence of virological failure