Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 17;25(6):985–996. doi: 10.1177/15248399231183388

Table 4.

Survey 3 Mixed-Methods Results: Statistics, Themes, Subthemes, and Revisions

Quantitative
Survey question N % missing Response M (SD) Median
(min–max)
From your perspective, how good is this definition of “arts participation?” (1 = not good, 10 = extremely good) 257 3.75% 1–6: 3%
7: 3%
8: 19%
9: 26%
10: 44%
8.9
(1.4)
9
(1–10)
Does this definition match with your understanding of what “arts participation” means? (y/n) 267 0% 1, Yes: 90%
2, Partially: 10%
3, No: .3%
1.1
(0.3)
1
(1–3)
Does this definition include the ways in which you participate in the arts? (y/n) 265 0.75% 1, Yes: 97%
2, No: 3%
1.03
(0.2)
1
(1–2)
From your perspective, are there any parts of this definition that should be changed? (y/n) 264 1.1% 1, Yes: 11%
2, No: 89%
1.89
(0.3)
2
(1–2)
Qualitative
Survey question Themes Resulting revisions
Does this definition include the ways in which you participate in the arts? (y/n) (If no) What is missing? (6 responses, no themes)
From your perspective, are there any parts of this definition that should be changed? (y/n) (If yes) Please specify the changes that should be made. • Definition is good/excellent
• Definition is long/too long
• Emphasize that examples are not meant to be inclusive
• Removed a few insignificant words
• Added: “examples provided are intended to suggest a broad range and are not intended to note every possible art form”
Do you have any other comments? • Definition is good/excellent
• Examples are comprehensive
• Definition is comprehensive
• Definition is long/too long