Table 3. Factors associated with the outcome analysed by ordinal logistic regression analysis using original data.
Factors | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
Sex (male) | 1.00 | 0.70 to 1.42 | 1.06 | 0.75 to 1.50 | 1.02 | 0.72 to 1.47 |
Stereoacuity (log) | 1.22 | 0.99 to 1.51 | 1.31 | 1.10 to 1.56 | ||
Adhering to the recommended time | 0.79 | 0.54 to 1.14 | 0.78 | 0.54 to 1.13 | 0.93 | 0.62 to 1.40 |
Successful DD time halving | 0.63 | 0.43 to 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.43 to 0.92 | ||
Strabismus angle at distance (PD) | 1.01 | 0.99 to 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.00 to 1.03 | ||
Strabismus angle at near (PD) | 1.00 | 0.99 to 1.02 | 0.99 | 0.97 to 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.00 to 1.02 |
Duration from onset to visit within 3 months | 0.93 | 0.62 to 1.38 | 0.94 | 0.63 to 1.41 | 0.86 | 0.57 to 1.28 |
Refractive error (D) | 1.00 | 0.94 to 1.06 | 1.00 | 0.94 to 1.06 | 0.99 | 0.93 to 1.05 |
Anisometropia 1.5 D or greater | 1.16 | 0.53 to 2.52 | 1.19 | 0.55 to 2.57 | 0.90 | 0.39 to 2.04 |
Using prism | 0.97 | 0.63 to 1.50 | 0.93 | 0.61 to 1.44 | 0.84 | 0.55 to 1.30 |
History of strabismus or amblyopia | 0.81 | 0.45 to 1.46 | 0.90 | 0.51 to 1.61 | 1.03 | 0.57 to 1.83 |
Model 1: Aadjusted for Aage and Sstereoacuity. Model 2: Aadjusted for age and strabismus angle at distance. Model 3: Aadjusted for age and successful DD time halving.
DdioptresDD timethe amount of time spent using hand-held digital devices per dayPDprism dioptres