Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 16;58(6):1214–1232. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00693-8

Table 5.

Agency and Regulator Responses to ECA (Includes Critiques of Any Non-baseline Controlled Pivotal Single-Arm Trial)

Feature of comparator/external control N (%)—FDA N (%)—EMA
Benchmark: Single arm trial bench-marked to aggregate (not patient-level) results 5 (25) 1 (5)
Data access: Patient level data not accessible by regulator or 3rd party data, ownership limits regulators QA or inspections; 3 (15) 0 (0)
Endpoint selection: Subjective, imaging, or biomarker endpoints without good reliability studies or time to event endpoint 6 (30) 2 (11)
Timing: ECA not contemporaneous to trial 9 (45) 0 (0)
Setting: ECA not generated among geographically representative populations and/ or similar practice setting as single arm trial 3 (15) 0 (0)
Baseline covariates: ECA and trial arms not balanced on baseline covariates; comparable inclusion/exclusion criteria cannot be applied to both arms 6 (30) 2 (12)
Disease status: cannot provide a clinical alternative at a similar point in the disease progression as the single arm trial 5 (25) 5 (29)
Outcome measurement: risk of outcome ascertainment bias in the comparator 4 (20) 0 (0)
Other Data quality issues 8 (30) 4 (24)