Table 2.
Summary of efficiency of biomass derived PAC in different battery device system.
Biomass sources | Battery type | Role | Capacity (mAh g−1) | Retention | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cherry pit | Lithium-ion | Anode | 160 | 95 % at 2.8 V, after 200 cycles | [121] |
Rice husk | Lithium-ion | Cathode | 17 at 100 mA g−1 | at 2.5 V after 500 cycles | [11] |
Rice husk | Lithium-ion | Anode | ∼253 | ∼81 %, after 400 cycles | [149] |
Agar | Lithium-ion | Anode | 320 | at 0.1C after 100 cycles | [150] |
Bagasse | Lithium-ion | Anode | 325 at 100 mA g−1 | after 100 cycles | [151] |
Apple | Lithium-ion | Anode | 1050 at 100 mA g−1 | after 200 cycles | [152] |
Celery | Lithium-ion | Anode | 990 at 100 mA g−1 | after 200 cycles | [152] |
Borassus flabellifer | Sodium-ion | Anode | 332 at 20 mA g- | 86.4 %, after 500 cycles | [153] |
Apple | Sodium-ion | Anode | 438 | after 200 cycles | [152] |
Celery | Sodium-ion | Anode | 451 | after 200 cycles | [152] |
Brewer's spent grain | Sodium-ion | Anode | 296 at 50 mA g−1 | 86.4 %, after 400 cycles | [154] |
Rice husk | Lithium-Sulfur | Cathode | 1230 and 970 | at 0.1C and 0.2C after 100 cycles | [11] |
Milk waste | Lithium-Sulfur | Separator/cathode | 495.2 | At 100 cycle | [155] |
Coconut shells | Lithium-Sulfur | Cathode | 929 | 80 %, after 100 cycles | [139] |
Peanut shell | Lithium-Sulfur | Cathode | 619 | 95 %, at 0.2C, after 100 cycles | [156] |
Pomelo peel | Lithium-Sulfur | Cathode | 750 | 96 %, at 2C, after 100 cycles | [157] |
Chitin | Aluminium-air | Cathode | 32.24 mW cm−2 at 20 mA cm−2 | At a discharge voltage of 1.17 V | [158] |
Wheat straw | Zinc-air | Cathode | 740.7 | 90.3 % | [159] |
Poplar inflorescence | Lithium-O2 | Cathode | 12060 at 0.02 mA cm−2 | At an average voltage of 2.8 V | [160] |