Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 1;7(11):e2433029. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33029

Table 2. Lung Ultrasound Scores and Diaphragm Excursion.

Variable Propofol group (n = 54) Propofol-ketamine group (n = 53) Relative risk (95% CI) or median difference (95% CI)a P value
Atelectasis, No. (%) 48 (88.9) 31 (58.5) 0.7 (0.5 to 0.8) <.001
Total lung scoreb (range, 0-84), median (IQR) 6 (3 to 10) 2 (0 to 4) 4.0 (2.0 to 5.0) <.001
B-line (B) scorec (range, 0-42), median (IQR) 2 (0 to 4) 0 (0 to 0) 1.0 (0.0 to 2.0) .001
Consolidation (C) scored (range, 0-42), median (IQR) 4 (1 to 6) 1 (0 to 2) 2.0 (1.0 to 3.0) <.001
Diaphragm excursion, mean (SD), mm 6.09 (2.33) 5.89 (2.25) 0.2 (−0.7 to 1.1) .66
a

Continuous variables are reported as median or mean difference (95% CI), whereas categorical variables are reported as relative risk (95% CI).

b

The total lung score was calculated as the sum of the C and B scores.

c

The degree of B-lines (B score) was graded from 0 to 3 as follows: 0, fewer than 3 isolated B-lines; 1, multiple B-lines; 2, multiple coalescent B-lines; and 3, white lungs.

d

The degree of juxtapleural consolidation (C score) was graded from 0 to 3 as follows: 0, no consolidation; 1, minimal consolidation; 2, small consolidation; and 3, large consolidation.