Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb 12;21(10):2629–2638. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.038

Table 2:

Adjusted Hazard ratio (aHR) of treatment success using ustekinumab or TNF antagonist therapy compared to vedolizumab as second line medication upon failure of TNF antagonist treatment in the MSHS and SPARC CD cohorts.

Cohort Second line medication aHR [95% CI] aHR p-value
MSHS Ustekinumab (ref: vedolizumab) 0.89 [0.77, 1.04] 0.15
SPARC Ustekinumab (ref: vedolizumab) 0.66 [0.54, 0.82] <0.001
MSHS TNF antagonist (ref: vedolizumab) 0.99 [0.86, 1.14] 0.89
SPARC TNF antagonist (ref: vedolizumab) 0.72 [0.60, 0.87] <0.001

Time-to-event analysis is based on IPTW-adjusted regression models using Weibull distribution.