Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 2;24:3038. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20514-9

Table 3.

Differences in sexual behaviors of study participants seropositive and seronegative before, during, and after the first lockdown in March 2020 [n (%) or median (IQR)]

Total SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity status
Positive Negative
Participants who completed at least one survey 206 (94%) 17 (89%) 189 (95%)
Number of surveys 438 37 401
Currently taking PrEP 174 (84%) 14 (82%) 160 (85%)
Partner count* 5.0 (3.0, 10.0) 6.5 (2.5, 14.7) 5.0 (3.0, 10.0)
Sex with occasional partners 168 (82%) 15 (88%) 153 (81%)
Changes in sexual behavior during the first lockdown
I only had sex with my steady partner 23 (11%) 1 (6%) 22 (12%)
I made an agreement with one of my sexual partners to only have sex with each other (“quarantine buddy”) 7 (3%) 0 7 (4%)
I didn’t have sexual contacts during that time 31 (15%) 5 (29%) 26 (14%)
I reduced my sexual contacts 129 (64%) 10 (59%) 119 (64%)
I didn’t change my sexual behavior 12 (6%) 1 (6%) 11 (6%)
I had more sexual contacts 1 (0.5%) 0 1 (0.5%)
Missing 3 0 3
Use dating apps** 156 (93%) 14 (93%) 142 (93%)
Changes in dating app behaviors during the first lockdown among those using dating apps (n = 156)
Use the same 40 (26%) 2 (14%) 38 (27%)
Fewer online dates 8 (5%) 0 8 (6%)
Use more for chatting than sex 44 (28%) 7 (50%) 37 (26%)
More online dates 61 (39%) 5 (36%) 56 (39%)
Other 3 (2%) 0 3 (2%)

*If participants filled out more than one follow-up survey, the number of partners they reported was averaged across all their follow-up surveys

**39 participants were missing data on dating app usage; 2 among the seropositive and 37 among the seronegative