Table 2.
Ablation study without or with different attention mechanisms.
| Model | P(%)
|
R(%)
|
mAP50(%)
|
mAP50-95(%)
|
Params(M)
|
FLOPs(G)
|
Weight(MB)
|
Time(ms)
|
FPS
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | 81.7 | 86.8 | 89.1 | 60.4 | 7.0 | 15.9 | 14.5 | 7.1 | 140 |
| C3CA | 88.6 | 78.8 | 79.7 | 54.5 | 8.4 | 17.1 | 17.3 | 9.2 | 108 |
| CA | 81.3 | 89.6 | 91.2 | 62.0 | 5.9 | 14.9 | 12.2 | 7.4 | 135 |
| C3CBAM | 92.3 | 76.6 | 91.3 | 60.6 | 7.1 | 15.9 | 14.5 | 9.0 | 111 |
| CBAM | 89.1 | 79.5 | 81.9 | 56.6 | 7.6 | 16.7 | 15.6 | 6.6 | 151 |
| C3ACF | 89.0 | 92.3 | 92.7 | 62.4 | 7.3 | 15.2 | 15.0 | 9.4 | 106 |
| ACF | 84.5 | 92.3 | 92.6 | 62.1 | 6.1 | 14.2 | 12.7 | 6.8 | 147 |
1. Highlight the best performance in the table using bold font, and underline the second best performance
2. The 
indicates the larger value achieved, the better performance is, while the 
indicates. the smaller, the better