Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 2;11:1192. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03951-4

Table 9.

Performance of models using standardized view in the cross-dataset scenario, using leave-one-dataset-out strategy.

Model Time Frequency
KH MS RW-T RW-W UCI WDM Mean KH MS RW-T RW-W UCI WDM Mean
KNN 58.3% 49.8% 38.1% 36.6% 34.6% 43.4% 43.5% 61.1% 81.4% 66.4% 58.8% 59.6% 72.2% 66.6%
Random Forest 54.3% 60.3% 47.6% 42.6% 65.8% 59.0% 54.9% 62.8% 82.8% 67.0% 69.6% 79.5% 71.4% 72.2%
SVM 52.1% 62.4% 49.5% 49.9% 66.5% 55.7% 56.0% 52.8% 80.6% 72.4% 68.3% 67.7% 69.6% 68.6%
CNN (1D)12 63.3% 79.0% 71.7% 68.0% 81.1% 70.3% 72.2% 66.2% 84.6% 71.4% 69.7% 77.2% 73.9% 73.9%
CNN (2D)12 61.4% 70.2% 61.9% 67.8% 70.7% 60.3% 65.4% 66.1% 83.6% 73.9% 69.9% 75.9% 73.3% 73.8%
CNN PF34 61.9% 67.2% 65.0% 66.1% 73.0% 54.9% 64.7% 71.9% 82.8% 70.5% 70.6% 78.3% 74.1% 74.7%
CNN PFF34 63.2% 66.3% 64.8% 67.5% 74.4% 56.0% 65.4% 70.3% 84.3% 69.5% 70.4% 77.6% 74.1% 74.4%
ConvNet13 63.9% 65.6% 47.3% 61.2% 70.1% 53.9% 60.3% 69.7% 85.6% 75.0% 71.3% 81.8% 79.1% 77.1%
IMU CNN14 54.2% 62.5% 42.9% 48.7% 64.8% 59.4% 55.4% 70.4% 85.6% 68.5% 71.3% 78.8% 74.7% 74.9%
IMU Transf.14 63.1% 58.5% 35.7% 57.5% 62.6% 59.8% 56.2% 67.5% 84.0% 67.7% 68.1% 76.4% 73.8% 72.9%
MLP (2 Layers) 55.7% 71.8% 54.9% 55.1% 68.7% 60.9% 61.2% 74.2% 83.9% 70.5% 65.0% 74.6% 73.2% 73.5%
MLP (3 layers) 53.3% 73.6% 54.2% 56.3% 67.3% 59.7% 60.8% 77.9% 85.4% 73.5% 67.2% 75.5% 75.2% 75.8%
ResNet15 58.5% 68.0% 41.1% 66.9% 76.8% 57.4% 61.4% 62.9% 79.8% 66.8% 65.5% 74.1% 69.1% 69.7%
ResNetSE67 60.4% 68.8% 47.1% 68.1% 73.3% 54.2% 62.0% 58.2% 77.5% 68.4% 66.9% 74.7% 67.1% 68.8%
ResNetSE-567 49.0% 67.0% 49.6% 66.2% 72.7% 51.7% 59.4% 65.4% 81.1% 67.5% 66.3% 75.0% 70.6% 71.0%
Max 63.9% 79.0% 71.7% 68.1% 81.1% 70.3% 72.2% 77.9% 85.6% 75.0% 71.3% 81.8% 79.1% 77.1%

The best results for each dataset and for each domain (time and frequency) are highlighted in bold. Mean column represents the average performance of the model in the datasets.