Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 4;16(10):e70828. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70828

Table 1. Characteristics of the study.

ACL: anterior cruciate ligament

Authors Year Study type Sample size Follow-up duration Success rate Failure rate Reoperation rate Clinical outcome measures
Rockborn and Messner [13] 2000 Comparative study 60 patients 13 years 90% 23% 20% No significant difference in knee function between groups; radiographic changes were similar in both groups
Stein et al. [14] 2010 Cohort study 81 patients 8.8 years 96.2% - - Better osteoarthritis prevention and sports activity recovery after repair
Nepple et al. [15] 2012 Systematic review and meta-analysis 566 patients >5 years 76.9% 23.1% 20.2%-24.3% Failure rate similar for medial and lateral meniscus
Siebold et al. [16] 2007 Case series 113 patients 6 years 71.6% 28.4% 28.4% Device-specific complications mean Lysholm scored 91 points
Paxton et al. [17] 2011 Systematic review 284 repairs, 143 meniscectomies Short and long term N/A 20.7% 20.7% Higher reoperation rates for repairs but better long-term outcomes
Johnson et al. [18] 1999 Retrospective study 48 patients 10 years, 9 months 76% 24% - 8% minimal joint changes
Lee et al. [19] 2009 Case series 20 patients 2 years 95.2% 4.8% 4.8% Significant improvement in clinical scores
Petersen et al. [20] 2021 Systematic review Various >7 years - Acceptable Acceptable Good long-term outcomes
Noyes and Barber-Westin [21] 2000 Prospective case series 29 patients 34 months 87% 13% 13% ACL reconstruction increased the success rate
Westermann et al. [22] 2014 Prospective cohort study 235 patients 6 years 86% 14% 14% Significant improvement in patient outcomes