Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 21;6:1471426. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1471426

Table 2.

Usability ratings of participants.

Overall (n = 27) Physicians (n = 8) Healthy subj. (n = 10) Patients (n = 9)
SUS (0–100) 89.6 (SD 9.3) 84.2 (SD 10.7) 88.8 (SD 8.9) 94.2 (SD 7.2) H = 4.47, P = .11
VisAAI (1–7)
Simplicity 6.2 (SD 0.7) 6.2 (SD 0.8) 6.2 (SD 0.7) 6.1 (SD 0.6) H = 0.09, P = .96
Diversity 5.3 (SD 1.1) 5.0 (SD 0.8) 4.9 (SD 1.0) 5.8 (SD 1.2) H = 2.94, P = .23
Colorfullness 5.8 (SD 1.0) 5.5 (SD 0.9) 5.7 (SD 1.0) 6.2 (SD 1.0) H = 3.40, P = .18
Raftsmanship 6.3 (SD 0.6) 6.1 (SD 0.5) 6.2 (SD 0.8) 6.5 (SD 0.5) H = 2.09, P = .35
Total 5.9 (SD 0.7) 5.7 (SD 0.5) 5.7 (SD 0.8) 6.2 (SD 0.6) H = 2.43, P = .30
MAUQ (1–7) 5.7 (SD 0.9) 5.7 (SD 0.9) 5.5 (SD 0.7) 5.8 (SD 1.1) H = 0.96, P = .62
FACEsemper specific questionnaire
Subgroups (1–7) 6.1 (SD 0.7) 6.0 (SD 1.0) 6.1 (SD 0.6) 6.3 (SD 0.4) H = 0.69, P = .71
Overall rating (5–1) 1.7 (SD 0.9) 1.9 (SD 1.3) 1.6 (SD 0.5) 1.6 (SD 0.9) H = 0.85, P = .65

Possible scores of each questionnaire are listed within backets (worst possible–best possible score). visAAI: visual aesthetics of app inventory; MAUQ: mHealth app usability questionnaire for standalone apps; SUS: system usability scale.