Table 3.
Factors influencing the preference for medicinal plants present the estimates of the coefficients of the binary logistic model. Where, significance p-value ‘∗∗∗’ 0.001 ‘∗∗’ 0.01 ‘∗’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1
Estimate | Std. Error | z value | Pr(>|z|) | OR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | −11.3655 | 3.587926 | −3.168 | 0.001536 ∗∗ | |
Sex | −0.07096 | 0.546232 | −0.13 | 0.896643 | 0.932 |
Individuals earning from Agroforestry (AFI) | 0.151492 | 0.044443 | 3.409 | 0.000653 ∗∗∗ | 1.164 |
Education | −0.33496 | 0.285961 | −1.171 | 0.241465 | 0.715 |
Challenges of medicinal plant collection | −1.51703 | 1.07774 | −1.408 | 0.159248 | 0.219 |
Ethnicity | 0.113192 | 0.049517 | 2.286 | 0.022258 ∗ | 1.120 |
Social forestry beneficiary participants | 0.315263 | 0.818113 | 0.385 | 0.699975 | 1.371 |
Knowledge of medicinal plants | 1.328981 | 0.653626 | 2.033 | 0.042028 ∗ | 3.777 |
Availability of Medical facility | −1.0092 | 0.700621 | −1.44 | 0.149745 | 0.365 |
Family size | 0.00517 | 0.003762 | 1.374 | 0.169327 | 1.005 |
Loan | 0.065782 | 0.037638 | 1.748 | 0.080511. | 1.068 |
Individuals earning income from other sources (without AFI) | −0.12507 | 0.060984 | −2.051 | 0.040274 ∗ | 0.882 |
Family beliefs on efficacy of MP | 0.018258 | 0.005749 | 3.176 | 0.001494 ∗∗ | 1.018 |