Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 3;14:26529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76931-8

Table 2.

Logistic regression models predicting choices in beauty judgment and approach-avoidance tasks.

Estimate [95% CI] Z value P value OR [95% CI]
Approach-avoidance
 Perceived curvature  − 0.05 [− 0.11, 0.01]  − 1.78 0.076 1 [0.95, 1.05]
 Computational curvature  − 0.09 [− 0.21, 0.04]  − 1.35 0.176 0.94 [0.83, 1.06]
 Perceived angularity  − 0.10 [− 0.17, 0.04]  − 3.07 0.002** 0.93 [0.88, 0.99]
Beauty
 Perceived curvature  − 0.17 [− 0.25, − 0.08]  − 3.88 0.0009** 0.89 [0.83, 0.95]
 Computational curvature 0.11 [− 0.07, 0.29] 1.23 0.22 1.14 [0.96, 1.36]
Perceived angularity  − 0.10 [− 0.20, − 0.01]  − 2.08 0.037* 1 [0.92, 1.08]

OR odds ratio; logistic regression predicting choices: “not beautiful” vs. “beautiful” (beauty judgments), “exit” vs. “enter” (approach-avoidance decisions). **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. The Nagelkerke pseudo R-squared value was computed for each model as a global effect size measure (approach avoidance = 0.002, beauty = 0.011).