Overview of the evaluation of E. mammata for graftwood/budwood | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating of the likelihood of pest freedom | Pest free with few exceptional cases (based on the median) | ||||
Percentile of the distribution | 5% | 25% | Median | 75% | 95% |
Proportion of pest‐free bundles | 9974 out of 10,000 bundles | 9985 out of 10,000 bundles | 9991 out of 10,000 bundles | 9995 out of 10,000 bundles | 9998.8 out of 10,000 bundles |
Percentile of the distribution | 5% | 25% | Median | 75% | 95% |
Proportion of infected bundles | 1.2 out of 10,000 bundles | 5 out of 10,000 bundles | 9 out of 10,000 bundles | 15 out of 10,000 bundles | 26 out of 10,000 bundles |
Summary of the information used for the evaluation |
Possibility that the pest could become associated with the commodity Entoleuca mammata is present in the UK, although not widely distributed. Betula pendula and B. pubescens are reported as hosts of the pathogen. Wounds could be present on twigs/branches taken for graftwood/budwood and may represent infection courts. The hosts can be present either inside or in the surroundings of the nurseries. Altogether, this suggests that association with the commodity may be possible. Measures taken against the pest and their efficacy General measures taken by the nurseries are effective against the pathogen. These measures include (a) the use of certified plant material; (b) the removal of infected plant material and (c) application of plant protection products. Interception records In the EUROPHYT/TRACES‐NT database there are no records of notification of Betula plants for planting neither from the UK nor from other countries due to the presence of E. mammata between the years 1995 and January 2024 (EUROPHYT, 2024; TRACES‐NT, 2024). Shortcomings of current measures/procedures None observed
Main uncertainties
|
Overview of the evaluation of E. mammata for bare root plants | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating of the likelihood of pest freedom | Pest free with some exceptional cases (based on the median) | ||||
Percentile of the distribution | 5% | 25% | Median | 75% | 95% |
Proportion of pest‐free plants/bundles | 9927 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9961 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9979 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9991 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9998 out of 10,000 plants/bundles |
Percentile of the distribution | 5% | 25% | Median | 75% | 95% |
Proportion of infected plants/bundles | 2 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 21 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 39 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 73 out of 10,000 plants/bundles |
Summary of the information used for the evaluation |
Possibility that the pest could become associated with the commodity Because of the similarity of the commodities, the expected susceptibility to the pathogen and the production systems, and of the nurseries and surroundings, the Panel validated the scenarios from the previous Scientific opinion on Acer platanoides from the UK (EFSA PLH Panel, 2023a) for Betula pendula and B. pubescens. As a result of this evaluation, the same values as for Acer platanoides were considered to be applicable for B. pendula and B. pubescens. Entoleuca mammata is present in the UK, although not widely distributed. Betula pendula and B. pubescens are reported as hosts of the pathogen. Mechanical wounds including pruning wounds are expected to be present and may represent infection courts. The hosts can be present either inside or in the surroundings of the nurseries. Altogether, this suggests that association with the commodity may be possible. Measures taken against the pest and their efficacy General measures taken by the nurseries are effective against the pathogen. These measures include (a) the use of certified plant material; (b) the removal of infected plant material and (c) application of plant protection products. |
||||
Interception records In the EUROPHYT/TRACES‐NT database there are no records of notification of Betula plants for planting neither from the UK nor from other countries due to the presence of E. mammata between the years 1995 and January 2024 (EUROPHYT, 2024; TRACES‐NT, 2024). Shortcomings of current measures/procedures None observed
Main uncertainties
|
Overview of the evaluation of E. mammata for plants in pots | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating of the likelihood of pest freedom | Pest free with some exceptional cases (based on the median) | ||||
Percentile of the distribution | 5% | 25% | Median | 75% | 95% |
Proportion of pest‐free plants/bundles | 9927 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9961 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9979 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9991 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9998 out of 10,000 plants/bundles |
Percentile of the distribution | 5% | 25% | Median | 75% | 95% |
Proportion of infected plants/bundles | 2 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 9 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 21 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 39 out of 10,000 plants/bundles | 73 out of 10,000 plants/bundles |
Summary of the information used for the evaluation |
Possibility that the pest could become associated with the commodity Because of the similarity of the commodities, the expected susceptibility to the pathogen and the production systems, and of the nurseries and surroundings, the Panel validated the scenarios from the previous Scientific opinion on Acer platanoides from the UK (EFSA PLH Panel, 2023a) for B. pendula and B. pubescens. As a result of this evaluation, the same values as for A. platanoides were considered to be applicable for B. pendula and B. pubescens. E. mammata is present in the UK, although not widely distributed. B. pendula and B. pubescens are reported as hosts of the pathogen. Mechanical wounds including pruning wounds are expected to be present and may represent infection courts. The hosts can be present either inside or in the surroundings of the nurseries. Altogether, this suggests that association with the commodity may be possible. Measures taken against the pest and their efficacy General measures taken by the nurseries are effective against the pathogen. These measures include (a) the use of certified plant material; (b) the removal of infected plant material and (c) application of plant protection products. Interception records In the EUROPHYT/TRACES‐NT database there are no records of notification of Betula plants for planting neither from the UK nor from other countries due to the presence of E. mammata between the years 1995 and January 2024 (EUROPHYT, 2024; TRACES‐NT, 2024). Shortcomings of current measures/procedures None observed
Main uncertainties
|
Overview of the evaluation of E. mammata for specimen trees | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating of the likelihood of pest freedom | Pest free with some exceptional cases (based on the median) | ||||
Percentile of the distribution | 5% | 25% | Median | 75% | 95% |
Proportion of pest‐free plants | 9889 out of 10,000 plants | 9937 out of 10,000 plants | 9965 out of 10,000 plants | 9985 out of 10,000 plants | 9997 out of 10,000 plants |
Percentile of the distribution | 5% | 25% | Median | 75% | 95% |
Proportion of infected plants | 3 out of 10,000 plants | 15 out of 10,000 plants | 35 out of 10,000 plants | 63 out of 10,000 plants | 111 out of 10,000 plants |
Summary of the information used for the evaluation |
Possibility that the pest could become associated with the commodity Entoleuca mammata is present in the UK, although not widely distributed. Betula pendula and B. pubescens are reported as hosts of the pathogen. Mechanical wounds including pruning wounds are expected to be present in those specimen trees and may represent infection courts. The hosts can be present either inside or in the surroundings of the nurseries. Altogether, this suggests that association with the commodity may be possible. Measures taken against the pest and their efficacy General measures taken by the nurseries are effective against the pathogen. These measures include (a) the use of certified plant material; (b) the removal of infected plant material and (c) application of plant protection products. Interception records In the EUROPHYT/TRACES‐NT database there are no records of notification of Betula plants for planting neither from the UK nor from other countries due to the presence of E. mammata between the years 1995 and January 2024 (EUROPHYT, 2024; TRACES‐NT, 2024). Shortcomings of current measures/procedures None observed
Main uncertainties
|