Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 4;16(11):e72961. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72961

Table 4. Comparison of comorbidity at follow-up of four years between SG and RYGB groups.

*Significance P value < 0.05; **high significance P value < 0.01

Items SG (n = 50) RYGB (n = 50) p value
DM type 2
Comorbidity present at baseline 10 (20%) 13 (26%) 0.32
No difference 6 (12%) 4 (8%)
Resolution 0 (0%) 5 (10%)
Partial resolution 2 (4%) 3 (6%)
Worse 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
HT
Comorbidity present at baseline 16 (32%) 10 (20%) 0.13
No difference 7 (14%) 1 (2%)
Resolution 2 (4%) 7 (14%)
Partial resolution 5 (10%) 2 (4%)
Worse 2 (4%) 2 (4%)
DL
Comorbidity present at baseline 10 (20%) 4 (8%) 0.07
No difference 4 (8%) 4 (8%)
Resolution 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Partial resolution 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Worse 4 (8%) 1 (2%)
Joint pain
Comorbidity present at baseline 20 (40%) 15 (30%) 0.20
No difference 7 (14%) 4 (8%)
Resolution 4 (8%) 3 (6%)
Partial resolution 2 (4%) 7 (14%)
Worse 7 (14%) 1 (2%)
GERD
Comorbidity present at baseline 2 (4%) 5 (10%) 0.22
No difference 2 (4%) 2 (4%)
Resolution 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Partial resolution 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Worse 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
OSAS
Comorbidity present at baseline 9 (18%) 8 (16%) 0.50
No difference 2 (4%) 3 (6%)
Resolution 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Partial resolution 6 (12%) 2 (4%)
Worse 1 (2%) 1 (2%)