Table 3.
Study/Reference | Study design | Sample size | Cancer type | Assessment for anxiety | Nursing methods and protocols | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(28) China | Cohort | 60 patients | Liver cancer | SAS | Comprehensive Nursing Approach. Protocol: 1. Preoperative care: introduced hospital ward environment, on-site lectures on negative psychology, explanation of successful treatment cases, helping the reduce avoid vasospasm negative psychology. 2. Intraoperative care: Reduced the patient’s tension and avoid vasospasm. 3. Postoperative nursing: Taken rest in bed for 1 day after surgery and move their bodies slightly. |
The SAS scores of patients in the comprehensive nursing group were significantly lower than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). In addition, comprehensive nursing approach ensure a smooth operation, improve postoperative quality of life, reduce postoperative adverse reactions, and enhancing patients’ satisfaction. |
(29) China | Cohort | 105 patients | Liver cancer | Zung SAS | Comprehensive nursing care Protocol: 1. Preoperative care: providing some information related to the surgery to bridge gap between nursing staff and patients. 2. Postoperative care: Communicating with patients about their pain and other adverse effects. Explaining and providing the overcoming measures of adverse effects. |
Pre- and post-operative comprehensive nursing care relieved the anxiety status of the patients and improved the quality of life patients who underwent surgeries for liver cancer. |
(26) China | Retrospective study | 80 patients | Gallbladder cancer | HAMA | Target nursing care. Protocol: The interventions included medication care, diet care, health advice for admission, preoperative and postoperative care, psychotherapy and progressive muscle, relaxation therapy and instructions for the surgical management. |
Patients with target nursing care showed significantly lower HAMA scores than the control group (P<0.01). Besides, the study group also showed more promising effects on depression than the control group (P<0.01). However, target nursing care did not significantly improve the quality of life before and after intervention. |
(16) China | Cohort | 155 patients | Esophageal cancer | SAS | High-quality nursing. Protocol: Psychological nursing: communication, solving patient’s problems, explaining the knowledge of esophageal cancer, precautions after operation and possible complications; Pain care: Keeping a comfortable posture, breathe deeply and relax, diverting patient’s attention by movie, music, and chatting; Nutritional nursing: applying Peptisorb, Nutrison, etc; Respiratory tract nursing; Nursing care of the incision; Nursing of respiratory function training. |
The SAS scores of patients with high-quality nursing were significantly lower than the control group (P <0.05). Additionally, the pain scores and depressive scores were also remarkably decreased after interventions. Furthermore, high-quality nursing could reduce pain and adverse events and promote rehabilitation. |
STAI, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; SAS, self-rating anxiety scale; HAMA, Hamilton anxiety scale.