Table 2.
Survey item | Survey answers [%] (N = 93) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
To what extent do you consider sEMG as an important element in the practice of physiotherapists? | Not important at all | Scarcely important | Moderately important | Extremely important |
3.2% | 47.3% | 46.2% | 3.2% | |
To what extent do you consider sEMG as an important tool in rehabilitation research? | Not important at all | Scarcely important | Moderately important | Extremely important |
0.0% | 7.5% | 51.6% | 40.9% | |
How has your new sEMG-related knowledge acquired during the Master RDM influenced your ability to assess and treat patients? | No influence | Minimal influence | Moderate influence | Strong influence |
15.1% | 54.8% | 29.0% | 1.1% | |
How comprehensive was your education on sEMG during your undergraduate studies? | None | Basic | Good | Excellent |
37.6% | 54.8% | 7.5% | 0.0% | |
Do you believe that your undergraduate degree (Bachelor's Degree) adequately prepared you for the use of sEMG in clinical practice? | Insufficient preparation | Limited preparation | Sufficient preparation | Excellent preparation |
81.7% | 15.1% | 3.2% | 0.0% | |
How has the advanced training in sEMG (Master RDM) enriched your knowledge? | No improvement | Minimal improvement | Moderate improvement | Significant improvement |
0.0% | 46.2% | 48.4% | 5.4% | |
Do you believe that the Master RDM has improved your proficiency in using sEMG? | No improvement | Minimal improvement | Moderate improvement | Significant improvement |
10.8% | 55.9% | 30.1% | 3.2% |