Table 4.
QTL for PM resistance identified in the tree F2 populations
| Population | QTL | Chr | Pos (cM) | a | d | LOD | R 2 | Confidence interval (cM) | Flanking markers (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A6 | qPM2 | 2 | 8.9 | -2.79 | -2.79 | 94.5 | 93.5 | 8.34–10.43 [2.1] | 778,333–1,142,653 |
| B2 | qPM5 | 5 | 92.7 | -2.17 | -1.28 | 62.8 | 80.1 | 91.63–94.67 [3.0] | 25,276,104–25,725,099 |
| C4 | qPM5 | 5 | 89.0 | -1.58 | -1.10 | 27.7 | 29.3 | 86.45–90.58 [4.1] | 25,203,821–25,678,875 |
| qPM12 | 12 | 77.4 | -1.52 | -1.12 | 28.9 | 31.0 | 75.15–78.44 [3.3] | 22,493,040–22,879,440 | |
| Total model | 49.2 | 71.6 |
Chr and Pos indicate the chromosome and peak position of QTL
Positions and length (between square brackets) of the confidence interval are indicated
Flanking markers (bp) is the confidence interval of QTL extending to the closest markers
a and d are the additive and the dominant effects of the QTL, respectively
R2 is the phenotypic variance explained by the QTL