Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2024 Oct 15;31(51):61114–61137. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35280-9

Long-term spatiotemporal changes in nitrate contamination of municipal groundwater resources after sewerage network construction in the Hungarian Great Plain

Tamás Mester 1,, György Szabó 1, Emőke Kiss 1, Dániel Balla 2
PMCID: PMC11534988  PMID: 39404944

Abstract

Over the last decades, as a consequence of wastewater discharges and other anthropogenic sources, severe nitrate (NO3) pollution has developed in municipal environment causing global concern. Thus, eliminating the potential sources of pollution is one of the major challenges of the twenty-first century, whereby sanitation services are essential for ensuring public health and environmental protection. In the present study, long-term monitoring (2011–2022) of shallow groundwater NO3 contamination in municipal environment was carried following the construction of the sewerage network (2014) in the light of the pre-sewerage situation. Our primary aim was to assess the long-term effects of sewerage on nitrate NO3 levels in the shallow groundwater and evaluate the efficiency of these sanitation measures over time. Based on the results, significant pollution of the shallow groundwater in the municipality was identified. During the pre-sewer period, NO3 concentrations exceeded the 50 mg/L limit in the majority of monitoring wells significantly, upper quartile values ranged between 341 and 623 mg/L respectively. Using Nitrate Pollution Index (NPI) and interpolated NO3 pollution maps, marked spatial north–south differences were detected. In order to verify the presence of wastewater discharges in the monitoring wells, the isotopic ratio shifts (δ) for 18O and D(2H) were determined, confirming municipal wastewater effluent. Variations in NO3/Cl molar ratios suggest also contamination from anthropogenic sources, including septic tank effluent from households and the extensive use of manure. Data series of 7 years (2015–2022) after the investment indicate marked positive changes by the appearance of decreasing trends in NO3 values confirmed by Wilcoxon signed rank test and ANOVA. By comparing the pre- and post-sewerage conditions, the mean NO3 value decreased from 289.7 to 175.6 mg/L, with an increasing number of monitoring wells with concentrations below the limit. Our results emphasise the critical role of sanitation investments, while also indicating that the decontamination processes occur at a notably slow pace. Detailed, long-term monitoring is therefore essential to ensure accurate follow-up of the ongoing changes. The results can provide information for local citizens and authorities to improve groundwater management tools in the region.

Keywords: Nitrate, Nitrate Pollution Index, Groundwater quality, Pollution, Wastewater, Sewerage network

Introduction

Human activities in built-up areas generate significant pollution loads, resulting in adverse consequences on groundwater quality especially in shallow aquifers (Fathmawati et al. 2018; Huerfano-Moreno et al. 2023). Over the last decades, urbanisation and linked human activities altered the groundwater quality and quantity worldwide (He et al. 2022; Huang et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2019). In rural areas, various sources endanger the municipal groundwater resources, the most crucial of these are uninsulated septic tanks, pit latrines, inadequate sewage treatment, landfills without proper engineering controls, animal husbandry with manure storage and other non-point sources trough leaching like garden fertilisation and agricultural activities around the settlements (Ahmad and Ghanem 2021; Roba et al. 2021). Eliminating these potential sources of pollution is one of the major challenges of the twenty-first century, even in more developed countries.

Urbanisation, particularly through the development of sewerage systems, has been identified as a significant factor influencing groundwater quality (Hashmi et al. 2023; Huang et al. 2020). Studies have shown that uninsulated septic systems and untreated wastewater are major contributors to elevated nitrate levels in shallow aquifers, particularly in peri-urban and rural areas (He et al. 2022). Results indicate that while the construction of sewerage networks mitigates nitrate pollution by reducing wastewater infiltration into the subsurface, the clean-up processes are gradual, with rates of improvement varying due to factors such as soil characteristics and local hydrogeology (Zhang et al. 2020).

Despite short-term reductions in nitrate concentrations following sewerage interventions, the long-term effects require sustained monitoring to understand the persistence and extent of improvements in groundwater quality. Studies demonstrate that while sewerage systems contribute to a decline in nitrate concentrations, the reductions are often slow and influenced by local hydrological conditions and urban infrastructure (Gan et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2024). Nitrate (NO3) is identified as one of the most common contaminants in groundwater, specifically in shallow aquifers worldwide by its high solubility and low fixation in soils (Arumi et al. 2005; Bhatnagar and Sillanpää, 2011). Nitrogen (N) is present in small amounts in many environments, with the vast majority originating from the atmosphere and soil, which can be significantly elevated by anthropogenic sources. When N is released into the soil, it undergoes the main processes of fixation, assimilation, ammonification, nitrification and denitrification (Burger and Jackson 2003). Leaching of NO3 from the unsaturated zone is a complex interaction of several factors, such as land use practices, soil nitrogen loading, groundwater recharge and water table depth (Birkinshaw and Ewen 2000). The spatial–temporal occurrence of nitrate in groundwater depends according to Almasri (2007) on on-ground nitrogen loading, soil characteristics and groundwater properties.

Although high NO3 loads occur mainly due to diffuse sources of pollution worldwide, point sources can result in extremely high NO3 concentrations in localised areas (Zhou et al. 2015). In addition, there are significant regional differences in terms of the main sources. While in the Mediterranean region, nitrate pollution is mainly caused by the use of nitrogen-rich fertilisers, in developing countries, the main source of groundwater nitrate pollution is the lack of proper conditions of sanitation (Kapembo et al. 2016; Re et al. 2017).

Since NO3 pollution is the most common form of water pollution globally, it is of strategic importance to monitor its spatial and temporal evolution (Abascal et al. 2022). Numerous studies have been carried out over the last few years to investigate NO3 pollution of groundwater resources. A number of methods have been used by environmental scientists around the world to evaluate water contamination, some of which include Water Quality Index methods, Nemerov Index, multivariate statistical analysis, fuzzy mathematics and GIS techniques (Jha et al. 2020; Mester et al. 2021; Petrushka et al. 2023; Yang et al. 2023). The Water Quality Index (WQI) method is widely used to determine the overall quality and suitability for drinking (Franz et al. 2022; Han et al. 2023; Mester et al. 2020a, b). The Nitrate Pollution Index (NPI) is special, single-parameter Water Quality Index, which can be applied to indicate the anthropogenic origin of nitrate in groundwater (Bahrami et al. 2020). Several studies have used NPI to assess whether nitrate originates from human activities (El Mountassir et al. 2022; Kada et al. 2023). Based on the high NPI values in Sidi Slimane region, Morocco, the authors suggested regular water quality monitoring in the future (Al-Aizari et al. 2023). Over recent years, groundwater quality has been assessed and monitored on a regular basis using a Geographic Information System (GIS), complemented by the IDW interpolation method, which has proven to be an effective tool for assessing and analysing spatial information on water resources (Balla et al. 2023; Ram et al. 2021). In the present study, GIS technique IDW interpolation method has been used for spatiotemporal assessment of NO3 contamination of the shallow groundwater.

Long-term monitoring data are of paramount importance to assess environmental changes, during which numerous studies have used interpolation techniques to evaluate long-term monitoring data and provide more detailed analyses. Chaudhuri et al. (2012) and colleagues assessed the spatio-temporal changes of groundwater NO3 levels in TX, USA, between 1960 and 2010, which revealed a deterioration in groundwater quality, as well as the other important finding that the main limitation to assessing groundwater NO3 concentrations was the lack of recent and adequate monitoring data. Results of the study conducted by Kim and colleagues (2018) on the Korean island of Jeju from 1993 to 2015 showed that declining nitrate levels in protected areas are a successful result of environmental protection measures (Kim et al. 2003). High NO3 concentrations in drinking water sources can pose a potential environmental and public health risk. Nitrates can affect human health by causing methemoglobinaemia “blue-baby syndrome” especially in infants and thyroid effects (Shaban et al. 2023; Ward et al. 2005). In addition, several studies demonstrated the carcinogenic feature of N-nitroso compounds and the relation with gastric cancer (Picetti et al. 2022; Sandor et al. 2001). It is important to note that although groundwater nitrate concentrations are within the World Health Organization (WHO) drinking water standard of 50 mg/L, they still pose a non-carcinogenic health risk to humans, especially children and infants (Qasemi et al. 2022).

These adverse effects have contributed to the numerous human health risk assessment studies that have been carried out in recent years (Adimalla and Qian 2023; Liu et al. 2022; Sheng et al. 2023). Alsabti and colleagues have used the Hazard Index to evaluate the health risks of contaminated groundwater around the Kuwait’s Bay (Alsabti et al. 2022). They found that 13 of 19 samples had potential health risks on humans. Based on the calculations of hazard quotient (HQ) in the semi urban region of South India, severe F and NO3 health risks have been identified (Dhakate et al. 2023).

In recent years in parallel with the increasing impacts of climate change and rapid expansion of water-intensive and polluting production processes such as battery production for electromobility, the population has become increasingly concerned about the quantitative and qualitative condition of groundwater resources in Hungary. Since the issue of water quantity and quality is currently of great interest to the public, therefore the monitoring of changes is of paramount importance. In addition, with the rise in environmental awareness, the protection of water resources has now become a priority for rural communities. Deeper integration between science and society could contribute to solve the nitrate pollution problems affecting rural regions of the world (Morris et al. 2003). Citizen Science approach may provide a very good example of this direction. Brockhage et al. (2022) were able to carry out thousands of nitrate measurements involving hundreds of residents and students in Germany, not only collecting a large amount of data, but also gaining the attention and active participation of the public (Brockhage et al. 2022).

Sanitation services are essential for ensuring public health and environmental protection, particularly in built-up areas, since untreated wastewater pose significant risk and can cause irreversible damage to aquatic systems (Barros 2023; Samudro et al. 2023). For wastewater management, on-site and off-site systems can be used in urban and rural areas, depending on the population size and financial conditions (Ghangrekar 2022). In the case of on-site systems, wastewater is stored within the boundaries of the building yard, typically in septic tanks or cesspits (Reay 2004; Richards et al. 2016). The adverse environmental impacts of these systems have been demonstrated by numerous studies (Mester et al. 2019; Withers et al. 2014). As a consequence, efforts to support the deployment of off-site systems have become a high priority in recent decades. In accordance with the European Union (EU) Council Directive concerning urban wastewater treatment (91/271/EEC), the establishment of the sewer systems of municipalities with pollutant loads above 2000 inhabitant equivalents (IE) is a compulsory task of the member states. Accordingly, a number of investments have been carried out in Hungary and are still projects in progress, raising the proportion of households connected to the sewer system to 88.1% by 2022 (Hungarian Central Statistical Office n.d.).

Urbanisation, particularly the expansion of sewerage networks, has a profound impact on groundwater quality. Since investments result in significant changes in the environment within the municipalities and can mitigate nitrate pollution by preventing the infiltration of untreated wastewater, it is of particular importance to monitor the ongoing changes. While several studies focus on the immediate impacts of urbanisation on water quality, and the majority of scientific works deal with analyses of current conditions, only few investigate the long-term dynamics of nitrate reduction following sewerage network construction. In addition, long-term and comprehensive monitoring is only feasible in very few cases.

This study aims to evaluate changes in nitrate concentrations by comparing pre- and post-sewerage water quality conditions, while also assessing the long-term effectiveness of nitrate attenuation following the sewerage installation. This approach enhances the understanding of the long-term impacts of sewerage network construction on groundwater nitrate levels. In addition, GIS techniques and statistical analyses will be used to provide a detailed overview of the spatial distribution of nitrate pollution. By this approach, it offers a more comprehensive understanding of how urbanisation-related infrastructure influences groundwater quality, with a particular focus on nitrate contamination. The results of the study can serve as useful and beneficial scientific information and can provide information for local citizens and authorities to improve groundwater management tools in the region.

Materials and methods

Geographical and geological description of the study area

The examined village of Báránd is situated in the eastern region of the Great Hungarian Plain, specifically in the Nagy-Sárrét area on the western side of the Sebes-Körös River’s alluvial deposit (Fig. 1). The population of the settlement was 2426 with a decreasing trend in 2023. The elevation of the Nagy-Sárrét area generally ranges from 85 to 89 m, and it is characterised as a flat plain with a relative relief of 0–3 m/km2. The digital elevation model created for the settlement and its surroundings is shown in Fig. 2. The direction of regional groundwater flow is oriented from south to north. The groundwater level is close to the surface, typically at a depth of 1–5 m, leading to the development of various soil types influenced by water (Michéli et al. 2006). Within the study region, prevalent soil types include Solonetz, Vertisol, Kastenozem and Chernozem, while in the settled area, anthropogenic effects have resulted in the formation of Anthrosols and Technosols.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Location of the study area and the monitoring wells

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Digital elevation model (DEM) of the study area

The water sampling site is located within a settlement area, characterised by significant anthropogenic activities. According to the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) classification, the site falls under the “111” continuous urban fabric category. This indicates a densely built-up area with a predominance of impervious surfaces, such as residential buildings and infrastructure.

The housing stock of the settlement is 1135, of which only 74 lack basic utilities (HSCO, 2023). In 2022, the number of houses connected to the sewage network was 939 (HSCO, 2023). Over the past decade, the annual water production in the settlement has ranged from 90,000 to 120,000 m3, with a corresponding supply of 70,000 to 90,000 m3 to households. Our calculations suggest that approximately 40–60% of municipal wastewater stored in cesspits without proper insulation may have seeped into the soil, resulting in an estimated annual leakage of 30,000–55,000 m3 at the municipal level during the period prior sewerage. The sewer network of the settlement was constructed in 2014 in compliance with relevant legislation, and more than 80% of the dwellings have been connected. In 2022, the amount of drinking water supplied to households was 75,800 m3, while the volume of wastewater discharged to a treatment plant was 59,010 m3 (HSCO 2023).

According to the shallow geological cross section of the settlement, Late Holocene and Lace Pleistocene sediments are dominant at the study area (Fig. 3). All deposits are of fluvial origin, the texture is predominantly clay and silt; however, alluvial sand layers can be observed at a depth of around 5 m. The high clay content plays an important role in terms of ammonium fixation and nitrate accumulation, which has been confirmed by our measurements (Mester et al. 2020a, b). High fixation capacity slows down the clean-up processes, as large amounts of organic and inorganic pollutants have accumulated in the soil over the last decades. At the same time, in terms of vertical spreading of contaminants, it is more favourable than sandy soils.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Geological cross section of the study area (modified based on Rónai 1980)

Sampling and laboratory analysis

Regular sampling of selected groundwater wells in the study area was carried out between 2011 and 2023 (Fig. 1). Depths of the monitoring wells ranged from 6 to 10 m. From 2013, the number of wells was increased to 40 during the summer sampling period in order to determine the spatial extent of contamination with the highest possible accuracy (Fig. 1). During water sampling, the upper 1-m section of the water column was sampled and transported in airtight flasks to the Laboratory of Geosciences at the University of Debrecen, for further analysis. Electrical conductivity (EC) and pH of the water samples were determined using WTW 315i and CONSORT C3010 measuring instruments. Dissolved oxygen (DO) was measured by Aquaread AP5000.

In order to assess the impact of agricultural activities on groundwater quality in the vicinity of the settlement, we established four monitoring wells in the outskirts of the settlement (Fig. 1), from which samples were taken in 2013. However, we were unable to maintain the wells in the long term due to the agricultural activity.

The most characteristic pollutants of municipal wastewater were included in the analysis. The ammonium ion (NH4+), nitrite ion (NO2), nitrate ion (NO3), orthophosphate ion (PO43−), chloride ion (Cl) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentrations were determined according to the Hungarian Standards (HS ISO 7150–1:1992, HS 448–18:2009, HS 1484–13:2009, HS 12750–17:1974). The sodium ion (Na+) was determined by using a PERKIN ELMER 300 atomic absorption device. Three replicates of each sample were analysed to ensure reproducibility and minimise variability in the results. Certified standards were employed for quantification, and instruments were calibrated as per the required protocols to maintain accuracy. These steps were taken to ensure the reliability and validity of the analytical data obtained. The results were assessed on the basis of the relevant limits of the Joint Decree No 6/2009. (IV. 14.) KvVM-EüM-FVM.

Applied GIS techniques and statistical analysis

IBM SPSS 26 software was utilised for the statistical processing of the data series and visualisation of the results. Beyond computing fundamental statistical metrics such as mean, lower and upper quartiles, mode, median and standard deviation, an assessment of the series’ normality was conducted. To enhance clarity, the results were depicted on various scatterplot and boxplot diagrams. Boxplot diagrams were chosen for their effectiveness in illustrating interquartile range, median and extremal values. Spearman’s rank correlation test was employed to assess the strength of the relationship between the variables. A hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was carried out to explore differences of spatial variation in nitrate concentrations. One-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) assesses the variation (the range of scores) among different groups and contrasts it with the variability within each individual group. In order to test the temporal differences in NO3 concentrations prior and after the sewerage network construction, the following null hypothesis is framed: H0: There is no significant difference in the pre-sewerage and post-sewerage periods on the NO3 concentrations. A one-way ANOVA analysis was conducted on the data series over years (2011–2022) to accept or reject the null hypothesis, during which the Levene test was used to assess homogeneity of variance. Tukey and Games-Howell post hoc tests were also conducted. When performing the hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), Euclidean distance and Ward’s method were applied as the similarity measurement and linkage, respectively.

GIS applications play a crucial role in assessing the spatial distribution of groundwater quality parameters by integrating spatial data with other geographical information (Nath et al. 2024). The visualisation of results and the spatial distribution of NO3 were determined through inverse distance weighting (IDW) interpolation using ArcGIS 10.4.1 software. In environmental sciences, interpolation serves as a fundamental geostatistical analysis method, frequently employed to predict values in unobserved locations based on observed values in specific locations (Li and Heap 2014). Interpolation techniques are grounded in the principle that points in close proximity share greater correlations and similarities than those at a further distance. The inverse-distance weighting (IDW) method, a deterministic model for spatial interpolation, stands is widely used by geoscientists (Fischer et al. 2021; Makaya and Maphosa 2023; Naik et al. 2022). Its popularity is, in part, attributable to its widespread implementation in numerous GIS packages (Lu and Wong 2008). This implies that the extent of correlations and similarities between neighbouring points is directly proportional to the distance that separates them. This distance is conceptualised as a reverse function, depicting the relationship between every point and its neighbouring points (Setianto and Triandini 2015).

Z0=i=1Nzi×di-ni=1Nzi×di-n

where Z0 is the estimation value of variable z in point I. The value of the sample at point I. is denoted as zi. di is the distance of sample point to estimated point; N is the coefficient that determines weigh based on a distance and n is the total number of predictions for each validation case.

Nitrate pollution index

Concentrations of nitrate below the contamination limit of 50 mg/L in a particular sample do not signify that no anthropogenic impact can be detected in that same sample. Literature data show that values above 20 mg/L indicate the presence of human influences (Obeidat et al. 2012). The Nitrate Pollution Index (NPI) considers this value in the calculation, thus providing a more detailed overview of pollution levels; therefore, it has been a commonly used method for assessing nitrate pollution (Arslan and Çolak 2023; Panneerselvam et al. 2020; Venkata Ratnalu et al. 2023). However, identifying natural background levels for groundwater in urbanised areas is crucial but challenging due to the extensive human activities that alter the natural hydrochemical baseline. The variability in local geology, hydrology and historical land use also adds to the difficulty, requiring comprehensive long-term monitoring and advanced analytical techniques to accurately assess groundwater quality. Since the study area is under strong anthropogenic influence, it is challenging to determine the natural background level. Therefore, for calculating the NPI, we used the literature value of 20 mg/L.

Since the Nitrate Pollution Index (NPI) indicates whether human activity has contributed to nitrate pollution of groundwater, therefore it was also applied to provide more detailed information regarding NO3 contamination in the study area using following formula (Obeidat et al. 2012):

NPI=Cs-HAVHAV

where Cs is the nitrate concentration of each sample, and HAV (human affected value) is the threshold value of anthropogenic origin set at 20 mg/L according to Obeidat et al. (2012). NPI is classified into five groups as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Values and categories of NPI and WHO limits on NO3 (Almasri 2007; Obeidat et al. 2012; WHO 2004)

NO3 (mg/L) NPI value NPI class NPI interpretation NO3 (mg/L) WHO limit WHO interpretation NO3 class
 < 20  < 0 1 Clean (unpolluted)  < 50 Desirable limit 1
20–40 0–1 2 Light pollution  = 50 Maximum permissible limit (MPL) 2
40–60 1–2 3 Moderate pollution  > 50 Not permissible limit (NPL) 3
60–80 2–3 4 Significant pollution
 > 80  > 3 5 Very significant pollution

Health risk assessment

Health risk assessment is considered as one of the most effective approaches for determining the risk to human health from environmental pollutants (Wongsanit et al. 2015). The assessment of non-carcinogenic risks associated with nitrate-contaminated drinking water intake utilised the human health risk assessment methodology established by US EPA (U.S. Epa 1989). The evaluation was conducted across various age groups, including infants (0–2 years), children (2–6 years), teenagers (6–16 years) and adults (≥ 16 years). It is important to highlight that, as per US EPA guidelines, nitrate is classified as a non-carcinogenic risk factor for human health. In the exposure assessment, the calculation of chronic daily intake (CDI) (mg/kg/day) of nitrate from drinking water was performed using the methodology outlined in the guideline:

CDI=C×IR×ED×EFBW×AET

Table 2 presents the definitions and values of the parameters used in the formula.

Table 2.

Parameters applied to calculate the chronic daily intake (CDI) and hazard quotient (HQ) of nitrate in the groundwater (Sailaukhanuly et al. 2024)

No Parameter Unit Infant (0 ≤ 2 years Child (2 ≤ 6 years) Teenager (6 ≤ 16 years) Adults (≥ 16 years)
1 C, concentration mg/L Measured in the study area
2 IR, ingestion rate L/day 0.62 0.78 2.0 2.5
3 ED, exposure duration year 1 6 16 30
4 EF exposure frequency day/year 350 350 350 350
5 BW, body weight kg 11.4 18.6 56.8 80
6 AET, average exposure time day 365 2190 5840 10950
7 RfD, reference dose mg/kg day 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6

A toxic effect is expected if the exposure dose of the pollutant exceeds the reference dose, usually expressed as a hazard quotient (HQ). RfD represents the reference dose for nitrate exposure, signifying a measure of chronic non-carcinogenic risks (1.6 mg/kg/day) (IRIS 2012). If the hazard quotient (HQ) exceeds 1, it signifies that the non-carcinogenic risk surpasses the acceptable level, suggesting a potential health risk.

HQ=CDIRfD

Results and discussion

Descriptive analysis of nitrate concentrations over 2011–2022

Data series for NO3 concentrations between 2011 and 2022 were examined on an annual basis. In order to assess the temporal and spatial changes caused by the construction of the sewerage network in the municipality in 2014, the data series were divided into two periods: (1) pre-sewerage period (2011–2014) and (2) post-sewerage period (2015–2022). One of our key objectives when assessing the results was to identify what measurable changes have resulted from the investment.

Descriptive statistics on the annual evolution of nitrate concentrations are shown in Table 3 presenting the statistical values for the pre- and post-sewerage periods. According to the results, severe contamination of the shallow groundwater was found in the municipality. Data from years before sewerage show concentrations significantly higher than the WHO and Hungarian limit of 50 mg/L. The upper quartile value of NO3 exceeded 500 mg/L in the years 2011 and 2014, while in 2012 the value was 497.8 mg/L. The lower quartile value exceeded 50 mg/L in all years (LQ range, 50.1–183.4 mg/L) prior to sewerage. However, the positive trend is clearly indicated by the decrease in the post-sewerage period. For the 7-year data series after the investment, the lower quartile values ranged between 23.7 and 43.1 mg/L and exceeded 50 mg/L only in 2022 (LQ = 76.1 mg/L). A significant decrease was observed in the upper quartiles, with values ranging from 153.0 to 377 mg/L between 2016 and 2022, representing a decrease of about 50% compared to the previous period.

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics on the annual evolution of nitrate concentrations in mg/L

Nitrate 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2021 2022
Mean 459.2 332.3 187.8 378.2 231.1 155.5 142.6 109.7 170.7 164.5 296.1
Median 486.7 352.8 104.6 266.3 65.6 50.2 73.6 45.9 120.6 87.9 172.2
Std. Deviation 306.9 241.1 164.3 322.9 260.3 159.1 159.2 129.5 171.7 181.7 329.9
Variance 94193 58129 27020 104285 67774 25322 25375 16774 29509 33024 108835
Range 926.4 791.4 562.4 1057.1 669.1 439.1 612.1 531.3 637.8 812.5 1176.4
Minimum 52.28 23.3 2.36 29.1 2.62 20.1 4.46 6.95 7.61 16.5 9.64
Maximum 978.7 814.7 564.8 1086.2 671.7 459.2 616.6 538.3 645.5 829.1 1186.0
Percentiles 25 183.4 113.5 50.1 96.7 33.2 34.9 37.6 23.7 43.1 33.2 76.1
50 486.7 352.8 104.6 266.3 65.6 50.1 73.1 45.9 120.6 87.9 172.2
75 623.2 497.9 341.7 535.9 509.1 302.8 221.1 153.0 244.8 184.9 377.3

The positive trends are also illustrated by the boxplot charts (Fig. 4). The year 2015 (UQ = 509.1 mg/L) is still very similar to previous years, which can be explained by the fact that only 1 year has passed since the investment. Elevated nitrate values in 2022 may be related to the fact that 2022 was the driest year over the last decades, which significantly affected groundwater levels and evaporation processes in wells; however, further investigations are required to confirm this relationship, and the potential impact of climate change on groundwater dynamics should also be assessed.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Nitrate concentrations and Nitrate Pollution Index values between 2011 and 2022

Descriptive statistical tests carried out for the pre- and post-sewerage conditions provide a simplified and more comprehensive picture of the differences between the two periods. The mean NO3 concentration decreased from 289.7 to 175.6 mg/L, the upper quartile from 475.5 to 233.5 mg/L. The increase in the number of wells with concentrations below the limit value is indicated by the decrease in the lower quartile from 70.8 to 38.5 mg/L.

The extremely different contamination conditions of the monitoring wells are revealed by the fact that the difference between the highest (1086.2 mg/L) and lowest (2.36 mg/L) value for the pre-sewage period was more than 1000 mg/L. This difference has slightly increased in the period following sewerage, indicating that clean-up processes are relatively slow and that other local effects can still have a strong influence on the contamination status of the monitoring wells.

High NO3 concentrations in the shallow groundwater resources of the settlement are in line with the results of other studies carried out in semi-urban and rural areas (Jawadi et al. 2022; Rahman et al. 2021). Adhikary et al. (2012) measured nitrate levels ranging from 57 to 1923 mg/L in the peri-urban areas of New Delhi, India, and identified wastewater as a major cause of the alarming levels of pollution. Su et al. (2020) found elevated levels of NO3 in the shallow groundwater beneath residential areas of Muling-Xingkai Plain, China, with a clear connection to anthropogenic activities dating back to the 1950s. The increased NO3 concentrations (8.5–251 mg/L) were attributed to domestic sewage discharge.

Origin of nitrate in shallow groundwater

Chloride ions (Cl) play a crucial role in assessing wastewater-induced groundwater contamination, as their presence is independent of microbiological and physical processes. Cl derived from chemical fertilisers typically lead to a notable elevation in NO3 concentrations; conversely, markedly high Cl levels accompanied by relatively low NO3 levels often signify the influence of domestic sewage, industrial wastewater and livestock effluent (Wei et al. 2017). Hence, analysing the NO3/Cl ratios can provide more insight into the dynamics and sources of nitrogen (Torres-Martínez et al. 2021). Thus, the dual-logarithm diagram has been applied in numerous studies to identify the origin of groundwater nitrate (NO3) concentrations. He et al. (2022) and colleagues investigated the natural and anthropogenic factors, and among other measurement based on the NO3/Cl ratios found, that manure and sewage were the main contributors to high NO3 levels. Widory et al. (2005) and colleagues concluded in their studies in selected sample sites in France that high Cl values associated with lower NO3 values indicate sewage effluent.

Variations in NO3/Cl molar ratios versus Cl molar concentrations are presented in Fig. 5. The result suggest that the contamination of shallow groundwater primarily resulted from anthropogenic sources, including septic tank effluent from households and the extensive use of manure as an organic fertiliser. Slight mixing with agricultural activity is also observed, but the impact of sewage and manure is predominant.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Identification of NO3 source: dual-logarithm diagram of NO3/Cl molar ratios vs. Cl (sampling year 2019)

To verify the presence of wastewater discharges in the monitoring wells of the municipality, the isotopic ratio shifts (δ) for 18O and D(2H) were determined for the year 2013. The δD values are plotted against δ18O values, and the global (GMWL) and local precipitation line (LMWL) are denoted (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

δD and δ18O values of the monitoring wells in selected monitoring wells, 2013

As the isotopic ratios of wastewater and precipitation from groundwater differ significantly, it is possible to detect wastewater mixing with groundwater. In the majority of the wells, the δ18O and δD values were significantly lower than the values of the local precipitation (δ18O =  − 9.3; δD =  − 60.8). The results obtained confirm our hypothesis that the groundwater in the monitoring wells is affected by municipal wastewater. The local precipitation line (LMWL) additionally enables the assessment of whether evaporation or recharge predominantly influences a specific sample. This suggests that evaporation can be observed in the majority of samples (Fig. 6).

In order to assess the agricultural impact on NO3, we established monitoring wells in agricultural areas outside the settlement and collected water samples (Fig. 1). Figure 7 shows the concentrations of phosphate, ammonium, nitrite and nitrate. Wells A and B, located in the northern and western directions, show low NO3 values (2.5 and 3.7 mg/L); in contrast, nitrate concentrations are significantly elevated in the southern (well C) and south-eastern (well D) wells, especially in well D, where nitrate reaches nearly 729 mg/L. This increasing pattern in nitrate contamination aligns with the regional groundwater flow direction, which moves from north to south, indicating a potential transport of nitrate contaminants along the flow gradient. Although the ammonium and phosphate concentrations do not exceed the contamination limits, the elevated values clearly reflect the influence of agricultural activities in the area.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The concentration of inorganic nitrogen forms and phosphate in the monitoring wells outside the settlement in 2013

Nitrification processes in the study area

The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration determines the type of microbial processes present in the groundwater and also influences the completeness of the reaction steps (Nikolenko et al. 2018). Particularly in the case of anaerobic conditions, microbial nitrification processes are unlikely, whereas denitrification processes prevail under such conditions (Goldberg et al. 2008). It has also been reported that pH values below 5.5 enhance nitrous oxide (N2O) accumulation, likely because N2O reductase is mostly inhibited under acidic conditions enabling N2O accumulation in the subsurface environment; thus, the denitrification process does not continue to the final step (Deurer et al. 2008). It has also been found that denitrification can result in the highest N2O at moderate DO concentrations (below 3.15–4 mg/L), since most denitrifiers are facultative anaerobes (Deurer et al. 2008).

Since pH and DO have a combined effect on nitrification processes, the optimal zone for nitrification and denitrification processes can be defined (Rathnayake et al. 2015; Torres-Martínez et al. 2021). This is illustrated in Fig. 7, where the pH versus DO values are plotted for the year 2019. The figure clearly shows that all samples fell into the ideal zone for nitrification, which resulted in higher NO3 concentration. DO values of the samples varied from 4.48 to 8.25 mg/L, while pH ranged from 6.81 to 7.9 (Fig. 8). It can be concluded based on the results that the nitrification process contributes significantly to nitrate concentrations.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Scatterplot contrasting pH with DO; the dashed lines determine the optimal zones of nitrification and denitrification processes

Correlation of NO3 with other hydrochemical parameters

For the study period 2011–2022, continuous data are available for eight parameters, whereas for the other parameters, unfortunately, data are not continuously collected throughout the years. Table 4 shows the results of the Spearman correlation analysis for the regularly measured parameters. It was revealed that the strongest significant (p < 0.01) positive correlation with NO3 has the electrical conductivity (EC) with a value of 0.710 in the pre-sewerage and with 0.669 in the post-sewerage period. In addition, a strong correlation was found for NO3/Na+ (r = 0483) in the pre-sewerage period, which decreased to 0.248 in the post-sewerage period. In the post-sewerage period in the case of NO3/NH4+, significant positive correlation was found, and a negative correlation in the case of NO3/pH (r =  − 0.339).

Table 4.

Spearman correlation matrix of the hydrochemical parameters for the pre- and post-sewerage periods

Pre-sewerage period
Parameter pH EC NH4+ NO2 NO3 PO43− COD Na+
pH 1
EC  − 0.268* 1
NH4+  − 0.10 0.409** 1
NO2 0.21 0.483** 0.363** 1
NO3  − 0.265* 0.710** 0.209 0.256 1
PO43− 0.102 0.108  − 0.108  − 0.143  − 0.022 1
COD 0.108 0.281* 0.281 0.271*  − 0.037 0.418** 1
Na+  − 0.123 0.448** 0.145 0.220 0.483** 0.079 0.001 1
Post-sewerage period
Parameter pH EC NH4+ NO2 NO3 PO43− COD Na+
pH 1
EC  − 0.231** 1
NH4+  − 0.046 0.469** 1
NO2  − 0.069 0.353** 0.286** 1
NO3  − 0.339** 0.669** 0.372** 0.282** 1
PO43− 0.381**  − 0.134 0.050  − 0.030  − 0.072 1
COD 0.196** 0.035 0.286** 0.139*  − 0.038 0.321** 1
Na+  − 0.008 0.470** 0.122  − 0.250** 0.248**  − 0.068 0.243** 1

*Correlation significant at the level 0.05 (two-tailed)

**Correlation significant at the level 0.01 (two-tailed)

In order to provide a more detailed view of the relationship between the parameters, NO3/EC, NO3/Na+, NO3/NH4+ and NO3/pH values were plotted against each other divided for pre- and post-sewerage period (Fig. 9). A significant decrease in pH can be seen in the period after sewerage, the mean value decreased from 7.94 to 7.46. In addition, EC values also showed a decreasing trend, with the upper quartile falling from 4497 to 3858 µS/cm and the lower quartile from 2155 to 1867 µS/cm. NH4+ values are also found to be in a significantly lower range, the upper quartile decreased from 0.82 to 0.65 mg/L, while the lower quartile decreased from 0.42 to 0.30 mg/L. Although high Na+ concentrations (> 1000 mg/L) were also measured after the canalisation, the lower quartile was reduced from 200.6 to 151.3 mg/L. The high values are the result of several factors, in addition to the geological and soil conditions in the area, Na+ was also influenced by increased evaporation due to the drought in 2022.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Scatterplot diagrams of NO3/EC, NO3/Na+, NO3/NH4+ and NO3/pH values for the pre- and post-sewerage periods

Spatial distribution and changes of NO3 over time

To reveal the spatial evolution of NO3 in the study area, interpolated spatial distribution maps were created for all years investigated between 2011 and 2022 (Fig. 10). The interpolated maps also show temporal changes of spatial patterns in the pre-sewerage (2011–2014) and post-sewerage (2015–2022) period. The time-series maps show a clear distinction between the considerably higher pollution levels in the period before sewerage. For the period 2011–2014, NO3 concentrations several times above the relevant limit value of 50 mg/L are observed in most parts of the municipality, accompanied by a N-S increase in pollution.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Annual NO3 distribution maps for the pre-sewerage (2011–2014) and post-sewerage (2015–2022) period

In 2015, the year after sewerage, the N-S pattern is very similar to previous years; however, the northern parts of the settlement can be considered less polluted. In the period 2016–2021, the proportion of areas with lower levels of pollution increased markedly, with a parallel decrease in the N-S disparity, and concentrations above 300 mg/L were only observed in the SE and NW parts of the settlement (Fig. 10).

Elevated nitrate concentrations in 2022 may be attributed to an extremely severe drought; however, further investigations are needed to confirm this. This finding is supported by the long-term (2009–2018) groundwater nitrate studies by Johson and colleagues in Scotland, which concluded that nitrate concentrations are highly sensitive to meteorological variations (Johnson et al. 2023). Lindsey and colleagues also found a strong relationship between nitrate and periods with drier or wetter than average based on thirty years of regional groundwater quality trend analysis in the USA (Lindsey et al. 2023). Both regional and local scale studies have revealed that recharge events commonly result in dilution of groundwater NO3 levels (Opsahl et al. 2017).

The results indicate the ongoing clean-up processes, but also highlight that groundwater pollution caused by anthropogenic nitrogen is potentially a long-term problem, as nitrogen storage in the vadose zone can last for decades (Mester et al. 2020a, b; Meter et al. 2016). This conclusion is consistent with the findings of other studies (Burow et al. 2010; Wassenaar et al. 2006). With the elimination of sources of pollution, a decrease in NO3 starts, which can be seen in our study. Kyte and colleagues observed a significantly decreasing temporal trend in selected wells located in parcels where manure application had ceased more than a decade earlier (Kyte et al. 2023).

Due to the apparent N-S differences in nitrate levels, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed, dividing the northern and southern areas (20–20 monitoring wells in each category). Due to the large number of samples, the analysis was performed for 3 time intervals: (1) the entire period before the sewerage, which includes 80 measurements; (2) the post-sewerage period, with data from the years 2017 and 2018; and (3) the post-sewerage period, with data from the years 2019 and 2021 (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Ward’s dendogram of the hierarchical cluster analyses, based on the location of the monitoring well in the pre- and post-sewerage period

The results of the pre-sewerage period clearly show a cluster of 33 wells (HC1) with predominantly northern wells (76%), a cluster (HC2) of 41 wells with a 73% share of southern wells and a cluster (HC3) of exclusively southern wells. In the second period considered, the size of the clusters containing predominantly southern wells decreased, indicating a reduction in the differences. This process continues in period 3, where only a single and relatively small cluster of predominantly southern well was found. In the dominant cluster, northern and southern wells were mixed (58% vs 42%).

Nitrate pollution index

The boxplot diagrams of calculated NPI values are presented in Fig. 4. The annual percentage distribution of samples within the 5 NPI categories is shown in Table 5. Out of a total data set of 297 samples for the period 2011–2022, only 22 samples were classified as “clean”, of which 82% were collected in the post-sewerage period. 15.8% of the total sample was classified as “light polluted” with an increasing frequency in the post-sanitation period as well. Fifty-eight percent of the samples were classified in the category “very significant pollution”; however, the percentage shows a downward trend after the sewerage (Table 5).

Table 5.

Crosstabulation of the NPI values for the years

Year Total
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2021 2022
NPI Clean (unpolluted) Count 0 0 4 0 2 0 5 7 2 1 1 22
% within NPI 0.0% 0.0% 18.2% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 22.7% 31.8% 9.1% 4.5% 4.5% 100.0%
% within year 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 15.4% 0.0% 12.5% 17.5% 5.0% 2.7% 2.9% 7.4%
% of total 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 1.7% 2.4% 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% 7.4%
Light pollution Count 0 2 2 2 2 3 9 9 6 10 2 47
% within NPI 0.0% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% 6.4% 19.1% 19.1% 12.8% 21.3% 4.3% 100.0%
% within year 0.0% 15.4% 5.0% 15.4% 15.4% 23.1% 22.5% 22.5% 15.0% 27.0% 5.9% 15.8%
% of total 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 1.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.0% 3.4% 0.7% 15.8%
Moderate pollution Count 1 0 6 0 1 4 4 7 6 1 2 32
% within NPI 3.1% 0.0% 18.8% 0.0% 3.1% 12.5% 12.5% 21.9% 18.8% 3.1% 6.3% 100.0%
% within year 7.1% 0.0% 15.0% 0.0% 7.7% 30.8% 10.0% 17.5% 15.0% 2.7% 5.9% 10.8%
% of total 0.3% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.3% 1.3% 1.3% 2.4% 2.0% 0.3% 0.7% 10.8%
Significant pollution Count 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 1 2 3 4 22
% within NPI 0.0% 0.0% 18.2% 0.0% 13.6% 0.0% 22.7% 4.5% 9.1% 13.6% 18.2% 100.0%
% within year 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 23.1% 0.0% 12.5% 2.5% 5.0% 8.1% 11.8% 7.4%
% of total 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1.7% 0.3% 0.7% 1.0% 1.3% 7.4%
Very significant pollution Count 13 11 24 11 5 6 17 16 24 22 25 174
% within NPI 7.5% 6.3% 13.8% 6.3% 2.9% 3.4% 9.8% 9.2% 13.8% 12.6% 14.4% 100.0%
% within year 92.9% 84.6% 60.0% 84.6% 38.5% 46.2% 42.5% 40.0% 60.0% 59.5% 73.5% 58.6%
% of total 4.4% 3.7% 8.1% 3.7% 1.7% 2.0% 5.7% 5.4% 8.1% 7.4% 8.4% 58.6%
Total Count 14 13 40 13 13 13 40 40 40 37 34 297
% within NPI 4.7% 4.4% 13.5% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 12.5% 11.4% 100.0%
% within year 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of total 4.7% 4.4% 13.5% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 12.5% 11.4% 100.0%

Based on the NPI categories, time-series spatial distribution maps were produced, in order to identify the spatial patterns of the pollution (Fig. 12). The results also show that there are marked differences in the N-S direction and that the proportion of areas with lower pollution levels increases significantly after sewerage.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Annual NPI distribution maps for the pre-sewerage (2011–2014) and post-sewerage (2015–2022) period

Temporal trend analysis of nitrate concentrations

The frequencies of nitrate concentrations for the pre- and post-sewerage periods are shown in Fig. 13. The most significant change was a significant increase in the frequency of relatively low concentrations below 100 mg/L, with a parallel marked decrease in the frequency of extremely high concentrations (> 500 mg/L).

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Frequency of NO3 concentration in the pre- and post-sewerage period

Several studies have used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to determine the statistical difference between paired samples (Elçi and Polat 2011; Rupert 2008). In the case of our study area, the Wilcoxon signed rank test analysis was carried out by combining data from the years before and after sewerage for each individual well. According to the test, statistically significant differences (p value = 0.001) in NO3 levels have been determined at 95% confidence level (p < 0.05). The frequency of positive and negative changes is illustrated in Fig. 14. The positive changes are illustrated by the fact that in 80% of all cases examined, a negative change was observed, i.e. a decrease in concentration compared to the reference year in the pre-sewerage period. In the vast majority of cases, a reduction of 0–50 mg/L was detected, with a decrease in frequency with increasing concentration value differences.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

Frequency of positive and negative differences in NO3 based on Wilcoxon signed rank test

In order to show the significant decreasing trends more detailed, scatterplot diagrams were generated for 6 selected monitoring wells showing NO3 concentrations as a function of the years of investigation (Fig. 15). In the case of the monitoring well 3, the values of 100–200 mg/L before sewerage were consistently dropped below 50 mg/L. Similar values and trends are observable in wells 17 and 28 respectively. A significant decrease from extremely high concentrations above 1000 mg/L to below 200 mg/L occurred in well 35.

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15

NO3 trends over the period between 2011 and 2022 of selected monitoring wells

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using least significance difference (LSD) method was applied to test the significant differences in mean values of NO3 concentration for the period 2011–2022. LSD is utilised to identify significant differences between group means as part of analysis of variance. There is always a difference between the mean values of a given parameter at different times, but whether the magnitude is statistically significant is uncertain. To perform the analysis, the results of the test of homogenity of variances are required, to decide whether the differences between the mean concentrations at the different sampling times are significant. As the significance value performed in SPSS software is lower than the 0.05 significance level, the null hypothesis assuming no difference in mean concentrations between sampling times is rejected. The result of the ANOVA shows a significant level at 0.001; hence, the NO3 mean values at different sampling times are significantly different.

Numerous studies apply one-way ANOVA tests to detect differences between groups. (Chitsazan et al. 2017) and colleagues examined NO3 concentrations at different sites using ANOVA and found significant differences between areas. The results of the ANOVA performed by Nemčić-Jurec and Jazbec (2017) showed statistically significant differences between groups of wells located at different distances from the point source of pollution (Nemčić-Jurec and Jazbec 2017).

The results from the long-term monitoring of NO3 contamination in shallow groundwater of the municipality after the construction of the sewerage network provide crucial insights into the effects of sanitation investments on groundwater quality. Over the period of 12 years (2011–2022), this study has revealed that the construction of the sewer network significantly reduced nitrate contamination, though the cleanup process is slow and ongoing, as indicated by the gradual but steady decrease in NO3 levels across the study area.

The substantial decrease in NO3 concentrations post-sewerage underscores the effectiveness of sanitation interventions in reducing anthropogenic contamination. These results align with previous studies that report long-term improvements in groundwater quality following the installation of proper sanitation infrastructure (Hashmi et al. 2023).

However, despite the positive overall trends, some monitoring wells continue to exhibit high nitrate concentrations, with values exceeding 500 mg/L even in the post-sewerage period. This suggests that the decontamination process is not uniform across the study area, due to variations in previous contamination loads, and ongoing pollution sources, such as septic tank effluent and agricultural runoff (Widory et al. 2005). These findings are supported by the dual-logarithmic diagram of NO3/Cl ratios, which implicates a combination of wastewater and manure as primary contamination sources. In addition, the retention of NO3 in soils with high clay content plays a critical role in nitrate persistence (Adimalla and Qian 2023). Additionally, the role of climate variability, such as the observed spike in nitrate levels during the drought year of 2022, requires further research to assess how extreme weather events may affect groundwater quality over time (Lindsey et al. 2023). Continuous monitoring, coupled with targeted pollution reduction strategies, will be essential to achieve sustainable groundwater management and further decrease in NO3 pollution.

Health risk assessment based on hazard quotient

The risk to human health was calculated based on the US EPA model and previously described parameters (Table 2). Since values higher than 1 indicate a health risk, the results indicate very high levels of potential risk. In the period before sewerage, significant health risk was identified for nitrate in the majority of the monitoring wells (Fig. 16). Upper quartile values exceeded the limit of non-carcinogenic risk by 10 times in the category teenager, 12 times in the category child and 17 times in the category infant. In the period after sewerage, a marked decrease occurred, the lower quartile values in the categories adult, teenager and child also decreased below the relevant limit (Fig. 16). Although the shallow groundwater is no longer used by the local population for water consumption, it should be noted that the water is consumed occasionally, especially by the older generation, and is also used for livestock watering, which can also pose a risk in the case of extremely high values. In accordance with our result, it has been demonstrated by numerous studies conducted in shallow aquifers that the consumption of shallow groundwater poses considerable health risks (Anim-Gyampo et al. 2019; Idriss et al. 2021; Wang and Li 2022; Wu and Sun 2016).

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16

Results of human health risk assessment based on hazard quotient (US EPA)

Conclusions

The presence of sanitation systems is of paramount importance for the protection of the urban environment and human health. In the present study, a long-term monitoring (2011–2022) of shallow groundwater NO3 contamination in municipal environment was carried over a period of almost a decade following the construction of the sewerage network in the light of the pre-sewerage situation.

Based on the results, significant pollution of the shallow groundwater in the municipality was identified. During the pre-sewer period, NO3 concentrations exceeded the 50 mg/L limit in the majority of monitoring wells by a considerable margin. Using interpolated NO3 pollution maps, differences in the spatial evolution of the contamination were also detected, characterised by marked N-S patterns, with a significant increase in NO3 concentrations towards the south.

Variations in NO3/Cl molar ratios suggest that the contamination of shallow groundwater primarily resulted from anthropogenic sources, including septic tank effluent from households and the extensive use of manure as an organic fertiliser. In order to verify the presence of wastewater discharges in the monitoring wells of the municipality, the isotopic ratio shifts (δ) for 18O and D(2H) were determined, confirming municipal wastewater effluent.

Data series of 7 years (2015–2022) after the investment indicate marked positive changes by the appearance of decreasing trends in NO3 values. By comparing the pre- and post-sewerage conditions, considerable reduction of the NO3 values was measured, with an increasing number of monitoring wells with concentrations below the limit.

According to Wilcoxon signed rank the test, statistically significant differences in NO3 levels have been determined (p < 0.05). The positive trends are illustrated by the fact that in 80% of all cases examined, a decrease in concentration was detected compared to the reference year in the pre-sewerage period. In the vast majority of cases, a reduction of 0–50 mg/L was observed. Based on the variance analysis in the mean values of NO3 concentration, significant differences were identified. By applying hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), it has been shown that the significant N-S concentration difference is becoming less pronounced in the area.

Nitrate Pollution Index (NPI) was used to detect the presence of human influences. Out of a total data set of 297 samples for the period 2011–2022, only 22 samples were classified as “clean” (< 20 mg/L NO3), of which 82% were collected in the post-sewerage period. Human health risk assessment, carried out according to the US EPA model, showed significant health risk for NO3 in the majority of the monitoring wells with a decreasing trend during the post-sewerage period.

Our results highlight the importance of sanitation investments and the fact that the decontamination processes are particularly slow. Detailed, long-term monitoring is therefore essential to ensure accurate follow-up of the ongoing changes.

Author contribution

Conceptualisation: Tamás Mester, Dániel Balla; methodology: Tamás Mester, Dániel Balla; software: Tamás Mester, Dániel Balla; validation: Tamás Mester, Emőke Kiss, György Szabó, Dániel Balla; formal analysis: Tamás Mester, György Szabó, Emőke Kiss, Dániel Balla; investigation: Tamás Mester, Dániel Balla; resources: Tamás Mester, György Szabó, Dániel Balla; data curation: Tamás Mester, Dániel Balla; writing—original draft preparation: Tamás Mester, Dániel Balla; writing—review and editing: Tamás Mester, György Szabó, Emőke Kiss, Dániel Balla; visualisation: Tamás Mester, Dániel Balla; supervision: Tamás Mester. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Debrecen. Project no. TKP2021-NKTA-32 has been implemented with the support provided from the National Research. Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary. Financed under the TKP2021-NKTA funding scheme. The work of Tamás Mester was supported by the ÚNKP-23–4-II-DE-20 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund. The work of Dániel Balla was supported by the EKÖP-24–4-II-DE-89 University Research Scholarship Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund. Supported by the University of Debrecen Scientific Research Bridging Fund (DETKA).

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval

The submitted work should be original and should have not been published elsewhere in any form.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have consented to publish the article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Abascal E, Gómez-Coma L, Ortiz I, Ortiz A (2022) Global diagnosis of nitrate pollution in groundwater and review of removal technologies. Sci Total Environ 810:152233. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adhikary PP, Dash ChJ, Chandrasekharan H, Rajput TBS, Dubey SK (2012) Evaluation of groundwater quality for irrigation and drinking using GIS and geostatistics in a peri-urban area of Delhi, India. Arab J Geosci 5:1423–1434. 10.1007/s12517-011-0330-7 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adimalla N, Qian H (2023) Evaluation of non-carcinogenic causing health risks (NCHR) associated with exposure of fluoride and nitrate contaminated groundwater from a semi-arid region of south India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:81370–81385. 10.1007/s11356-022-21771-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmad W, Ghanem M (2021) Effect of wastewater on the spring water quality of Sarida Catchment – West Bank. Arab J Basic Appl Sci 28:292–299. 10.1080/25765299.2021.1958489 [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-Aizari HS, Aslaou F, Al-Aizari AR, Al-Odayni A-B, Al-Aizari A-JM (2023) Evaluation of groundwater quality and contamination using the Groundwater Pollution Index (GPI), Nitrate Pollution Index (NPI), and GIS. Water 15:3701. 10.3390/w15203701 [Google Scholar]
  6. Almasri MN (2007) Nitrate contamination of groundwater: a conceptual management framework. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:220–242. 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alsabti B, Sabarathinam C, Svv DR (2022) Identification of high nitrate concentration in shallow groundwater of an arid region: a case study of South Kuwait’s Bay. Environ Monit Assess 195:143. 10.1007/s10661-022-10698-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Anim-Gyampo M, Anornu GK, Appiah-Adjei EK, Agodzo SK (2019) Quality and health risk assessment of shallow groundwater aquifers within the Atankwidi basin of Ghana. Groundw Sustain Dev 9:100217. 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100217 [Google Scholar]
  9. Arslan H, Çolak MG (2023) The assessment of groundwater quality through the water quality and nitrate pollution indexes in northern Türkiye. Environ Monit Assess 195:1257. 10.1007/s10661-023-11854-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Arumi JL, Oyarzún R, Sandoval M (2005) Natural protection against groundwater pollution by nitrates in the Central Valley of Chile/Protection Naturelle Contre la Pollution des Eaux Souterraines par les Nitrates Dans la Vallée Centrale du Chili. Hydrol Sci J 50:340. 10.1623/hysj.50.2.331.61799 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bahrami M, Zarei AR, Rostami F (2020) Temporal and spatial assessment of groundwater contamination with nitrate by nitrate pollution index (NPI) and GIS (case study: Fasarud Plain, southern Iran). Environ Geochem Health 42:3119–3130. 10.1007/s10653-020-00546-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Balla D, Kiss E, Zichar M, Mester T (2023) Evaluation of groundwater quality in the rural environment using geostatistical analysis and WebGIS methods in a Hungarian settlement, Báránd. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 10.1007/s11356-023-28627-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Barros AJA (2023) Assessment of the natural vulnerability of underground aquifer aiming at the hierarchization of locations for the implementation of water supply and sanitary sewage systems in the municipality of Ananindeua/PA. Brazilian Journal of Water Resources 28:11. 10.1590/2318-0331.282320230025 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2011) A review of emerging adsorbents for nitrate removal from water. Chem Eng J 168:493–504. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.01.103 [Google Scholar]
  15. Birkinshaw SJ, Ewen J (2000) Nitrogen transformation component for SHETRAN catchment nitrate transport modelling. J Hydrol 230:1–17. 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00174-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brockhage F, Lüsse M, Klasmeier J, Pietzner V, Beeken M (2022) Citizen Science as an innovative approach to analyze spatial and temporal influences on nitrate pollution of water bodies: results of a participatory research project in Germany. Sustainability 14:9516. 10.3390/su14159516 [Google Scholar]
  17. Burger M, Jackson LE (2003) Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem 35:29–36. 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00233-X [Google Scholar]
  18. Burow KR, Nolan BT, Rupert MG, Dubrovsky NM (2010) Nitrate in groundwater of the United States, 1991–2003. Environ Sci Technol 44:4988–4997. 10.1021/es100546y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chaudhuri S, Ale S, DeLaune P, Rajan N (2012) Spatio-temporal variability of groundwater nitrate concentration in Texas: 1960 to 2010. J Environ Qual 41:1806–1817. 10.2134/jeq2012.0022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chitsazan M, Mohammad Rezapour Tabari M, Eilbeigi M (2017) Analysis of temporal and spatial variations in groundwater nitrate and development of its pollution plume: a case study in Karaj aquifer. Environ Earth Sci 76:391. 10.1007/s12665-017-6677-7 [Google Scholar]
  21. Deurer M, von der Heide C, Böttcher J, Duijnisveld WHM, Weymann D, Well R (2008) The dynamics of N2O near the groundwater table and the transfer of N2O into the unsaturated zone: a case study from a sandy aquifer in Germany. CATENA 72:362–373. 10.1016/j.catena.2007.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dhakate R, More S, Duvva LK, Enjamuri S (2023) Groundwater chemistry and health hazard risk valuation of fluoride and nitrate enhanced groundwater from a semi-urban region of South India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:43554–43572. 10.1007/s11356-023-25287-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. El Mountassir O, Bahir M, Ouazar D, Chehbouni A, Carreira PM (2022) Temporal and spatial assessment of groundwater contamination with nitrate using nitrate pollution index (NPI), groundwater pollution index (GPI), and GIS (case study: Essaouira basin, Morocco). Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:17132–17149. 10.1007/s11356-021-16922-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Elçi A, Polat R (2011) Assessment of the statistical significance of seasonal groundwater quality change in a karstic aquifer system near Izmir-Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 172:445–462. 10.1007/s10661-010-1346-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fathmawati F, Fachiroh J, Sutomo AH, Putra DPE (2018) Origin and distribution of nitrate in water well of settlement areas in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Environ Monit Assess 190:628. 10.1007/s10661-018-6958-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fischer A, Lee M-K, Ojeda AS, Rogers SR (2021) GIS interpolation is key in assessing spatial and temporal bioremediation of groundwater arsenic contamination. J Environ Manage 280:111683. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Franz HS, Pertille J, Kunst-Valentini MH, dos Santos GB, Pontes GS, Guedes HAS (2022) Assessment of shallow groundwater quality for drinking purposes: an integrated approach based on the water quality index and the use of multivariate statistical analyses, southern Brazil. Environ Earth Sci 81:452. 10.1007/s12665-022-10564-w [Google Scholar]
  28. Gan L, Huang G, Pei L, Gan Y, Liu C, Yang M, Han D, Song J (2022) Distributions, origins, and health-risk assessment of nitrate in groundwater in typical alluvial-pluvial fans, North China Plain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:17031–17048. 10.1007/s11356-021-17067-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ghangrekar MM (2022) Onsite sanitation systems. In: Ghangrekar MM (ed) Wastewater to water: principles, technologies and engineering design. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 833–858. 10.1007/978-981-19-4048-4_19 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goldberg SD, Knorr K-H, Gebauer G (2008) N2O concentration and isotope signature along profiles provide deeper insight into the fate of N2O in soils†. Isot Environ Health Stud 44:377–391. 10.1080/10256010802507433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Han X, Tang F, Liu A-L (2023) Drinking water quality evaluation in supply systems in Wuhan, China: application of entropy weight water quality index and multivariate statistical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 10.1007/s11356-023-31212-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hashmi S, Kanwal H, Ghazal L, Arsalan M (2023) Spatial distribution analysis and mapping of groundwater quality of Malir and Landhi Town, Karachi. Pakistan J Sci Ind Res Ser: Phys Sci 66:169–179 [Google Scholar]
  33. He S, Li P, Su F, Wang D, Ren X (2022) Identification and apportionment of shallow groundwater nitrate pollution in Weining Plain, northwest China, using hydrochemical indices, nitrate stable isotopes, and the new Bayesian stable isotope mixing model (MixSIAR). Environ Pollut 298:118852. 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang G, Liu C, Zhang Y, Chen Z (2020) Groundwater is important for the geochemical cycling of phosphorus in rapidly urbanized areas: a case study in the Pearl River Delta. Environ Pollut 260:114079. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Huerfano-Moreno GJ, Rojas-Peña JI, Zapata-Muñoz YL, Trujillo-González JM, Torres-Mora MA, García-Navarro FJ, Jiménez-Ballesta R (2023) Comparative assessment of the quality and potential uses of groundwater in a typical rural settlement in Colombia. Water 15:667. 10.3390/w15040667 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hungarian Central Statistical Office (n.d.) Secondary public utility gap. Hungarian Central Statistical Office. https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/kor/hu/kor0067.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2024
  37. Idriss IEA, Abdel-Azim M, Karar KI, Osman S, Idris AM (2021) Isotopic and chemical facies for assessing the shallow water table aquifer quality in Goly Region, White Nile State, Sudan: focusing on nitrate source apportionment and human health risk. Toxin Reviews 40:764–776. 10.1080/15569543.2020.1775255 [Google Scholar]
  38. IRIS (2012) IRIS-Integrated Risk Information System, Nitrate (CASRN 14797–55–8) [WWW Document]. URL https://ofmpub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/termreg/searchandretrieve/glossariesandkeywordlists/search.do?details=&glossaryName=IRIS%20Glossary. Accessed 16 Jan 24
  39. Jawadi HA, Iqbal MW, Naseri M, Farahmand A, Azizi AH, Eqrar MN (2022) Nitrate contamination in groundwater of Kabul Province, Afghanistan: reasons behind and conceptual management framework discourse. J Mt Sci 19:1274–1291. 10.1007/s11629-021-7002-1 [Google Scholar]
  40. Jha MK, Shekhar A, Jenifer MA (2020) Assessing groundwater quality for drinking water supply using hybrid fuzzy-GIS-based water quality index. Water Res 179:115867. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Johnson H, Simpson EM, Troldborg M, Ofterdinger U, Cassidy R, Soulsby C, Comte J-C (2023) Evaluating groundwater nitrate status across the river Ythan catchment (Scotland) following two decades of nitrate vulnerable zone designation. Environments 10:67. 10.3390/environments10040067 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kada H, Demdoum A, Aouati H (2023) Groundwater contamination apportionment in Beida-Bordj rural territory, northeast Algeria, using the nitrate pollution index (NPI) and groundwater pollution index (GPI). Sustain Water Resour Manag 9:152. 10.1007/s40899-023-00931-1 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kapembo ML, Laffite A, Bokolo MK, Mbanga AL, Maya-Vangua MM, Otamonga J-P, Mulaji CK, Mpiana PT, Wildi W, Poté J (2016) Evaluation of water quality from suburban shallow wells under tropical conditions according to the seasonal variation, Bumbu, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Expo Health 8:487–496. 10.1007/s12403-016-0213-y [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim H-S, Ko J-M, Hwang S-J (2003) Evaluation of water quality variation and sediment of a shallow artificial lake (lake llgam) in located the metropolitan area. Korean J Ecol Environ 36:161–171 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kim HR, Oh J, Do HK, Lee KJ, Hyun IH, Oh SS, ... & Yun ST (2018) Spatial-temporal variations of nitrate levels in groundwater of Jeju Island, Korea: Evaluation of long-term (1993-2015) monitoring data. Econ Environ Geol 51(1):15–26. 10.9719/EEG.2018.51.1.15
  46. Kyte E, Cey E, Hrapovic L, Hao X (2023) Nitrate in shallow groundwater after more than four decades of manure application. J Contam Hydrol 256:104200. 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2023.104200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Li J, Heap AD (2014) Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: a review. Environ Model Softw 53:173–189. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lindsey BD, Fleming BJ, Goodling PJ, Dondero AM (2023) Thirty years of regional groundwater-quality trend studies in the United States: major findings and lessons learned. J Hydrol 627:130427. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130427 [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu M, Xiao C, Liang X, Wei H (2022) Response of groundwater chemical characteristics to land use types and health risk assessment of nitrate in semi-arid areas: a case study of Shuangliao City, Northeast China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 236:113473. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu R, Xie X, Hou Q, Han D, Song J, Huang G (2024) Spatial distribution, sources, and human health risk assessment of elevated nitrate levels in groundwater of an agriculture-dominant coastal area in Hainan Island, China. J Hydrol 634:131088. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131088 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lu GY, Wong DW (2008) An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Comput Geosci 34:1044–1055. 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  52. Makaya E, Maphosa MT (2023) Spatial analysis of groundwater quality in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe: geogenic and anthropogenic contributions. Phys Chem Earth, Parts a/b/c 131:103436. 10.1016/j.pce.2023.103436 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mester T, Balla D, Karancsi G, Bessenyei É, Szabó G (2019) Eects of nitrogen loading from domestic wastewater on groundwater quality. Water SA 45:349–358. 10.4314/wsa.v45i3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Mester T, Balla D, Szabó G (2020a) Assessment of groundwater quality changes in the rural environment of the Hungarian great plain based on selected water quality indicators. Water Air Soil Pollut 231:536. 10.1007/s11270-020-04910-6 [Google Scholar]
  55. Mester T, Cavalli D, Balla D, Szabó G (2020b) A talaj fixált ammónium-ion tartalmának hatása a talajvíz tisztulási folyamataira a szennyezőforrás felszámolását követően települési környezetben. Agrokém Talajt 69:55–71. 10.1556/0088.2020.00065 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mester T, Szabó G, Balla D (2021) Assessment of shallow groundwater purification processes after the construction of a municipal sewerage network. Water 13:1946. 10.3390/w13141946 [Google Scholar]
  57. Meter KJV, Basu NB, Veenstra JJ, Burras CL (2016) The nitrogen legacy: emerging evidence of nitrogen accumulation in anthropogenic landscapes. Environ Res Lett 11:035014. 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035014 [Google Scholar]
  58. Michéli E, Fuchs M, Hegymegi P, Stefanovits P (2006) Classification of the major soils of Hungary and their correlation with the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB). Agrokém Talajt 55:19–28. 10.1556/agrokem.55.2006.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  59. Morris BL, Lawrence ARL, Chilton PJC, Adams B, Calow RC, Klinck BA (2003) Groundwater and its susceptibility to degradation : a global assessment of the problem and options for management. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/kor/hu/kor0067.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2024
  60. Naik MR, Barik M, Prasad KV, Kumar A, Verma AK, Sahoo SK, Jha V, Sahoo NK (2022) Hydro-geochemical analysis based on entropy and geostatistics model for delineation of anthropogenic ground water pollution for health risks assessment of Dhenkanal district, India. Ecotoxicology 31:549–564. 10.1007/s10646-021-02442-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nath AV, Sekar S, Roy PD, Kamaraj J, Shukla S, Khan R (2024) Drinking and irrigation quality and pollution assessments of the groundwater resources from Alappuzha in Kerala (India) through an integrated approach using WQI and GIS. J Geochem Explor 258:107391. 10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107391 [Google Scholar]
  62. Nemčić-Jurec J, Jazbec A (2017) Point source pollution and variability of nitrate concentrations in water from shallow aquifers. Appl Water Sci 7:1337–1348. 10.1007/s13201-015-0369-9 [Google Scholar]
  63. Nikolenko O, Jurado A, Borges AV, Knӧller K, Brouyѐre S (2018) Isotopic composition of nitrogen species in groundwater under agricultural areas: a review. Sci Total Environ 621:1415–1432. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Obeidat MM, Awawdeh M, Al-Rub FA, Al-Ajlouni A (2012) An innovative nitrate pollution index and multivariate statistical investigations of groundwater chemical quality of Umm Rijam Aquifer (B4), North Yarmouk River Basin, Jordan. In: Vouddouris K, Voutsa D (eds) Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment. InTech, Croatia, pp 169–188 [Google Scholar]
  65. Opsahl SP, Musgrove M, Slattery RN (2017) New insights into nitrate dynamics in a karst groundwater system gained from in situ high-frequency optical sensor measurements. J Hydrol 546:179–188. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.038 [Google Scholar]
  66. Panneerselvam B, Paramasivam SK, Karuppannan S, Ravichandran N, Selvaraj P (2020) A GIS-based evaluation of hydrochemical characterisation of groundwater in hard rock region, South Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci 13:837. 10.1007/s12517-020-05813-w [Google Scholar]
  67. Petrushka K, Petrushka I, Yukhman Y (2023) Assessment of the impact of military actions on the soil cover at the explosion site by the Nemerov method and the Pearson coefficient case study of the city of Lviv. J Ecol Eng. 24:77–85. 10.12911/22998993/170078 [Google Scholar]
  68. Picetti R, Deeney M, Pastorino S, Miller MR, Shah A, Leon DA, Dangour AD, Green R (2022) Nitrate and nitrite contamination in drinking water and cancer risk: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Environ Res 210:112988. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Qasemi M, Farhang M, Morovati M, Mahmoudi M, Ebrahimi S, Abedi A, Bagheri J, Zarei A, Bazeli J, Afsharnia M, Ghalehaskar S, Ghaderpoury A (2022) Investigation of potential human health risks from fluoride and nitrate via water consumption in Sabzevar, Iran. Int J Environ Anal Chem 102:307–318. 10.1080/03067319.2020.1720668 [Google Scholar]
  70. Rahman A, Mondal NC, Tiwari KK (2021) Anthropogenic nitrate in groundwater and its health risks in the view of background concentration in a semi arid area of Rajasthan, India. Sci Rep 11:9279. 10.1038/s41598-021-88600-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ram A, Tiwari SK, Pandey HK, Chaurasia AK, Singh S, Singh YV (2021) Groundwater quality assessment using water quality index (WQI) under GIS framework. Appl Water Sci 11:46. 10.1007/s13201-021-01376-7 [Google Scholar]
  72. Rathnayake RMLD, Oshiki M, Ishii S, Segawa T, Satoh H, Okabe S (2015) Effects of dissolved oxygen and pH on nitrous oxide production rates in autotrophic partial nitrification granules. Biores Technol 197:15–22. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Re V, Sacchi E, Kammoun S, Tringali C, Trabelsi R, Zouari K, Daniele S (2017) Integrated socio-hydrogeological approach to tackle nitrate contamination in groundwater resources. The case of Grombalia Basin (Tunisia). Sci Total Environ 593–594:664–676. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Reay WG (2004) Septic tank impacts on ground water quality and nearshore sediment nutrient flux. Ground Water 42:1079–1089. 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02645.x [Google Scholar]
  75. Richards S, Paterson E, Withers PJA, Stutter M (2016) Septic tank discharges as multi-pollutant hotspots in catchments. Sci Total Environ 542:854–863. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Roba C, Balc R, Creta F, Andreica D, Padurean A, Pogacean P, Chertes T, Moldovan F, Mocan B, Rosu C (2021) Assessment of groundwater quality in NW of Romania and its suitability for drinking and agricultural purposes. Environ Eng Manag J 20:435–447. 10.30638/eemj.2021.043 [Google Scholar]
  77. Rupert MG (2008) Decadal-scale changes of nitrate in ground water of the United States, 1988–2004. J Environ Qual 37:S-240-S−248. 10.2134/jeq2007.0055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sailaukhanuly Y, Azat S, Kunarbekova M, Tovassarov A, Toshtay K, Tauanov Z, Carlsen L, Berndtsson R (2024) Health risk assessment of nitrate in drinking water with potential source identification: a case study in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 21:55. 10.3390/ijerph21010055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Samudro G, Samudro H, Departmentof Architecture,Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Malang, INDONESIA, Mangkoedihardjo S, Department of Environmental Engineering,Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, INDONESIA (2023) Wastewater quality determines the quantity of offsite sanitation based on downstream standards. IJSCET 14. 10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.04.019
  80. Sandor J, Kiss I, Farkas O, Ember I (2001) Association between gastric cancer mortality and nitrate content of drinking water: ecological study on small area inequalities. Eur J Epidemiol 17:443–447. 10.1023/a:1013765016742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Setianto A, Triandini T (2015) Comparison of kriging and inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation methods in lineament extraction and analysis. J Appl Geol 5. 10.22146/jag.7204
  82. Shaban J, Al-Najar H, Kocadal K, Almghari K, Saygi S (2023) The effect of nitrate-contaminated drinking water and vegetables on the prevalence of acquired methemoglobinemia in Beit Lahia City in Palestine. Water 15:1989. 10.3390/w15111989 [Google Scholar]
  83. Sheng D, Meng X, Wen X, Wu J, Yu H, Wu M, Zhou T (2023) Hydrochemical characteristics, quality and health risk assessment of nitrate enriched coastal groundwater in northern China. J Clean Prod 403:136872. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136872 [Google Scholar]
  84. Su C, Zhang F, Cui X, Cheng Z, Zheng Z (2020) Source characterization of nitrate in groundwater using hydrogeochemical and multivariate statistical analysis in the Muling-Xingkai Plain, Northeast China. Environ Monit Assess 192:456. 10.1007/s10661-020-08347-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Torres-Martínez JA, Mora A, Mahlknecht J, Daesslé LW, Cervantes-Avilés PA, Ledesma-Ruiz R (2021) Estimation of nitrate pollution sources and transformations in groundwater of an intensive livestock-agricultural area (Comarca Lagunera), combining major ions, stable isotopes and MixSIAR model. Environ Pollut 269:115445. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. U.S. Epa (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume I: human health evaluation manual (part a). EPA/540/1–89/002
  87. Venkata Ratnalu G, Dhakate R, More S (2023) Aqueous geochemistry and non-carcinogenic health risk through chloride and nitrate enriched groundwater of cosmopolitan Bangalore city India. Int J Environ Anal Chem 0:1–25. 10.1080/03067319.2023.2173007 [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang Y, Li P (2022) Appraisal of shallow groundwater quality with human health risk assessment in different seasons in rural areas of the Guanzhong Plain (China). Environ Res 207:112210. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Ward MH, deKok TM, Levallois P, Brender J, Gulis G, Nolan BT, VanDerslice J (2005) Workgroup report: drinking-water nitrate and health—recent findings and research needs. Environ Health Perspect 113:1607–1614. 10.1289/ehp.8043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wassenaar LI, Hendry MJ, Harrington N (2006) Decadal geochemical and isotopic trends for nitrate in a transboundary aquifer and implications for agricultural beneficial management practices. Environ Sci Technol 40:4626–4632. 10.1021/es060724w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wei Y, Fan W, Wang W, Deng L (2017) Identification of nitrate pollution sources of groundwater and analysis of potential pollution paths in loess regions: a case study in Tongchuan region. China Environ Earth Sci 76:423. 10.1007/s12665-017-6756-9 [Google Scholar]
  92. WHO W.H.O. (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organization. https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/kor/hu/kor0067.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2024
  93. Widory D, Petelet-Giraud E, Négrel P, Ladouche B (2005) Tracking the sources of nitrate in groundwater using coupled nitrogen and boron isotopes: a synthesis. Environ Sci Technol 39:539–548. 10.1021/es0493897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Withers PJ, Jordan P, May L, Jarvie HP, Deal NE (2014) Do septic tank systems pose a hidden threat to water quality? Front Ecol Environ 12:123–130. 10.1890/130131 [Google Scholar]
  95. Wongsanit J, Teartisup P, Kerdsueb P, Tharnpoophasiam P, Worakhunpiset S (2015) Contamination of nitrate in groundwater and its potential human health: a case study of lower Mae Klong river basin, Thailand. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:11504–11512. 10.1007/s11356-015-4347-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wu J, Sun Z (2016) Evaluation of shallow groundwater contamination and associated human health risk in an alluvial plain impacted by agricultural and industrial activities, mid-west China. Expo Health 8:311–329. 10.1007/s12403-015-0170-x [Google Scholar]
  97. Yang Y, Li P, Elumalai V, Ning J, Xu F, Mu D (2023) Groundwater quality assessment using EWQI with updated water quality classification criteria: a case study in and around Zhouzhi County, Guanzhong Basin (China). Expo Health 15:825–840. 10.1007/s12403-022-00526-9 [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhang F, Huang G, Hou Q, Liu C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q (2019) Groundwater quality in the Pearl River Delta after the rapid expansion of industrialization and urbanization: distributions, main impact indicators, and driving forces. J Hydrol 577:124004. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124004 [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhang M, Huang G, Liu C, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Wang J (2020) Distributions and origins of nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium in various aquifers in an urbanized coastal area, south China. J Hydrol 582:124528. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124528 [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhou Z, Ansems N, Torfs P (2015) A global assessment of nitrate contamination in groundwater. International Groundwater Resources Assessment Center. Internship report 4. https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/kor/hu/kor0067.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2024

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES