Skip to main content
Aging Medicine logoLink to Aging Medicine
. 2024 Oct 22;7(5):649–667. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12363

Iron accumulation/overload and Alzheimer's disease risk factors in the precuneus region: A comprehensive narrative review

Sana Mohammadi 1, Sadegh Ghaderi 1,2, Farzad Fatehi 1,3,
PMCID: PMC11535174  PMID: 39507230

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and neuronal loss. Early cerebral and body iron dysregulation and accumulation interact with AD pathology, particularly in the precuneus, a crucial functional hub in cognitive functions. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), a novel post‐processing approach, provides insights into tissue iron levels and cerebral oxygen metabolism and reveals abnormal iron accumulation early in AD. Increased iron deposition in the precuneus can lead to oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and accelerated neurodegeneration. Metabolic disorders (diabetes, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and obesity), genetic factors, and small vessel pathology contribute to abnormal iron accumulation in the precuneus. Therefore, in line with the growing body of literature in the precuneus region of patients with AD, QSM as a neuroimaging method could serve as a non‐invasive biomarker to track disease progression, complement other imaging modalities, and aid in early AD diagnosis and monitoring.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, iron, precuneus


Early Alzheimer's disrupts iron balance in the precuneus, a critical brain region for cognition. QSM, a post‐processing imaging technique, reveals this abnormal iron deposition, potentially offering a non‐invasive way to track disease progression and its link to metabolic, genetic, and vascular risk factors.

graphic file with name AGM2-7-649-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an age‐related neurodegenerative disease (NDD) with cognitive, behavioral, and psychological symptoms that ultimately lead to cognitive decline and memory loss. 1 , 2 It is the most common form of dementia, 3 contributing to 60%–70% of cases, 4 and is the fifth‐leading cause of death among Americans aged 65 and older. 5 , 6 Currently, more than 55 million people have dementia worldwide, with more than 60% living in low‐income and middle‐income countries. 7 This number is projected to increase to 152 million by 2050. 8 The global number of patients with AD dementia, prodromal AD, and preclinical AD is estimated to be 416 million, or 22% of all persons 50 and above. 9 Recent advances in molecular biology and neuroimaging have highlighted the multifactorial interplay between genetic, environmental, and metabolic factors that contributes to AD pathogenesis. 3 , 10 , 11 , 12 Although aging is the strongest risk factor, 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 accumulating evidence suggests that metabolic dysfunction and iron dysregulation also significantly influence AD pathogenesis. 3 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20

Iron bound to hemoglobin plays a crucial role in oxygen transport and protein functions. 21 They also play roles in DNA synthesis, repair, and iron homeostasis. 22 Iron plays a role in myelination, antioxidant enzyme function, and neurotransmitter synthesis. 22 Factors such as aging, inflammation, metal dysregulation, and oxidative stress disrupt iron metabolism. 22 , 23 Iron overload in the body, which is often associated with conditions such as hereditary hemochromatosis or excessive iron intake, can cause a variety of problems such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and damage to cells and neurons. 24 , 25 One aspect of AD that has received increasing attention is the role of iron accumulation and dysregulation of iron homeostasis in the brain. 26 Several studies have used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to observe changes in magnetic susceptibility (χ) changes, particularly to detect increased iron content using T2* mapping, T2* gradient echo imaging, quantitative T2* and transverse relaxation rates R2 and susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI). 3 , 27 , 28 Magnetic susceptibility is a physical feature that aids the quantification of specific materials and chemical identification. 29 However, these techniques suffer from blooming artifacts and cannot quantify the tissue susceptibility. 30 Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an MRI method that enables the measurement of materials that cause changes in susceptibility. 31 , 32

It is challenging to explain AD using a single pathological pathway. Aβ triggers a chain of events in AD including tau pathology. 22 Oxidative stress, neural inflammation, autophagy, apoptosis, and metal dysregulation have also been observed in AD. 3 , 22 Metal dyshomeostasis, intracellular iron deposition, and ferroptosis are key causes of neuronal loss in patients with AD. 22 , 33 In AD, iron overload can result in increased production of Aβ by altering the expression and processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP). 34 In the early stages of AD, amyloids tend to accumulate mainly in the temporal, basal frontal, and occipital lobes. As the disease advances, amyloid deposition spreads to other areas of the brain. 2 , 35 Positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid images show a characteristic distribution in different regions of the brain, beginning in the precuneus, inferior temporal gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex, and posterior cingulate gyrus. 36 , 37 Iron is found at high levels in plaques and can cause Aβ to aggregate, which is cytotoxic in vitro. 34 , 38 Iron overload can also lead to autophagic cell death and ferroptosis as well as contribute to the phosphorylation of tau protein, leading to the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), all of which increase the risk of NDDs. 33 , 34

Interestingly, previous advanced non‐invasive MRI studies have consistently reported emerging evidence of iron accumulation, 30 , 39 , 40 hypoperfusion, 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 atrophy, 39 , 42 , 44 , 51 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 cortical thinning, 54 , 61 , 66 , 71 , 72 , 73 and connectivity disruptions 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 in the precuneus of patients with AD. Remarkably, the precuneus represents a central functional hub affected by AD. 80

The precuneus, a part of the posteromedial parietal lobule, is closely related to the posterior parietal cortex in front of the cuneus and is limited by the cingulate sulcus 82 (Figure 1). Early brain atrophy and functional changes in the precuneus region are considered vulnerable areas during the transition from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia and AD. 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 This region is involved in a range of cognitive functions, including self‐referential processing, visuospatial attention, navigation, and autobiographical and episodic memory. 87 , 88 Iron deposition in the precuneus has been associated with cognitive decline, gray matter (GM) atrophy, and impaired functional connectivity (FC), suggesting its potential role in disease progression. 30 , 39 , 40 The precuneus experiences early amyloid deposition, NFT formation, vascular dysfunction, and cerebral hypoperfusion, which are believed to initiate a neurodegenerative cascade that leads to cognitive decline and early AD symptoms. 40 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The precuneus and associated regions.

Another significant contributor to the progression of AD is obesity, particularly obesity in midlife, along with associated metabolic and long‐term conditions, such as type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 93 , 94 , 95 These metabolic syndromes have become epidemics in recent years. 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 These conditions independently increase AD risk by systemically promoting insulin resistance (IR), adipocytokine dysregulation, chronic inflammation, and increased iron deposition. 17 , 100 , 101 , 102 Given the role of adiposity in altering body iron storage 103 , 104 and the implication of abnormal iron levels in AD neuropathology, 17 , 105 QSM may provide insights into the interactions between obesity‐linked risk and AD pathogenesis. Therefore, there is a significant overlap between the vulnerability of the precuneus to amyloid deposition and dysregulation in obesity and other associated metabolic functions, 54 , 106 more research is needed to understand the interrelationships between these factors.

Evidence suggests that early detection and intervention for MCI, particularly amnestic MCI (aMCI), may be associated with a reduced prevalence of mild Alzheimer's symptoms and facilitate earlier diagnosis of the disease. 107 Therefore, it is critical to understand the early changes that occur in the brain, particularly in the precuneus/posterior parietal cortex, due to iron deposition/accumulation, alterations in other MR neuroimaging biomarkers, and metabolic disorders. This literature review aimed to synthesize current knowledge on the association between iron overload, iron accumulation, and metabolic disorders in the context of AD pathophysiology in the precuneus. In addition, we introduce QSM (χ) as a potential emerging neuroimaging biomarker and explore its potential utility in predicting the onset and progression of AD.

2. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

The key features of AD include the deposition of β‐amyloid (Aβ) plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau tangles, as well as neuronal loss and glial activation. 3 Although research has historically focused on Aβ pathology, recent evidence suggests that tau pathology may be more closely associated with the onset and progression of AD symptoms. 108 , 109 However, the relationship between Aβ and tau pathology remains controversial. 110 , 111 Reactive oxygen species (ROS)‐induced oxidative damage is associated with NDDs, diabetes, and aging. 112 , 113 , 114 Elevated ROS levels contribute to AD progression, neurodegeneration, Aβ plaque deposition, and proteinopathy in the brain. 45 , 115 ROS can alter the expression and function of iron‐regulatory proteins, such as ferroportin and ferritin, which store and transport iron within cells. ROS can also affect the balance between iron and other metals in the brain, leading to iron deposition in the brain. Nevertheless, iron accumulation and deposition have drawn the interest of researchers as potential new neuroimaging biomarkers that reflect the early diagnosis and disease severity in AD. 3 , 116 Changes in iron metabolism and accumulation have been detected in the brain tissues of patients with AD, with iron found in the same locations as senile plaques and NFTs. 117 , 118 Abnormal proteins in AD brain tissues bind ferric iron and convert it to ferrous iron, which leads to the generation of harmful hydroxyl radicals, contributing to the ferroptosis pathway. 119 As a result, abnormal iron accumulation is suggested to be involved in the development of AD because it is present in the initial phases of the disease, interacts with Aβ and tau, and plays a significant role in inflammation associated with AD. 118

Many brain regions affected by AD show early signs of atrophy without prominent deficits in neuroimaging and metabolism biomarkers. 51 , 70 These findings offer unique insights into AD pathophysiology. However, several neuroimaging 54 , 56 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 and neuropsychological 124 , 126 , 127 studies have reported brain structural alterations and cognitive domains impairments such as executive functions and episodic memory in obese individuals.

2.1. Obesity and adipose tissue changes

Obesity, which affects 30% of the world's population (2.1 billion people), is caused by genetic, behavioral, and environmental factors. 128 Obesity is associated with NDDs, such as AD, multiple sclerosis (MS), and Parkinson's disease (PD). 129 , 130 Different types of adipose tissue, including brown adipose tissue (BAT), white adipose tissue (WAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), have distinct roles in energy metabolism and adipocytokine secretion. 130 The VAT and SAT are associated with obesity and metabolic disorders. 131 BAT and WAT are involved in energy metabolism. 132 BAT is linked to reduced VAT levels and increased SAT levels, leading to a decrease in central obesity. 133 Increased VAT has been potentially associated with accelerated brain aging, decreased cortical thickness (CTh), cerebral atrophy, and lower cognitive scores. 134 Obesity in midlife is a risk factor for developing AD, regardless of other metabolic factors, such as diabetes and hypertension. 135 However, high BMI/body weight in late life is protective against AD and cognitive decline. 135 , 136 Additionally, BMI, waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), and body fat percentage (BFP) have been studied to assess their relationships with brain structure and function. 123 These obesity‐related measures have been linked to GM atrophy, particularly in regions sensitive to AD pathology, such as the precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). 54 , 123

In a recent study, Chen et al. 123 utilized MRI data and a Mendelian randomization method to establish a direct link between obesity and cerebral structure. Their findings revealed that the genetically predicted VAT was connected to the surface area of the isthmus cingulate and precuneus. Additionally, genetically predicted BFP was linked to a reduced cortical surface area in the precuneus. The results of the multivariable Mendelian randomization method indicated that a higher BFP was associated with reduced thickness of the fusiform gyrus and a smaller surface area of the precuneus. They also discovered a strong relationship between obesity, brain abnormalities, and neuropsychiatric diseases such as AD.

A study by Dolatshahi et al. 54 found that the ratio of visceral to VAT/SAT was significantly associated with the Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) standardized uptake value ratio (SUVRs) in the right precuneus cortex, particularly in males. This association was linked to lower CTh in areas associated with AD, such as the bilateral temporal cortices and parahippocampal and cingulate cortices. Additionally, higher BMI and IR were associated with a lower CTh in the temporal pole. In midlife, cognitively normal adults, higher visceral obesity, and IR were associated with higher amyloid pathology in the right precuneus cortex and lower CTh in the areas associated with AD.

On the other hand, obesity is characterized by chronic, low‐grade, systemic inflammation that is associated with anemia in chronic disease and can alter iron metabolism parameters. 137 Changes in iron metabolism parameters are common in overweight and obese individuals, particularly during adolescence and morbid obesity. 138 These alterations include increased ferritin, hepcidin, and hepatic iron content 139 and decreased hemoglobin, transferrin, and total iron binding capacity (TIBC). 137 Serum ferritin levels have been associated with obesity indicators. 140 , 141 Impaired functional iron status is linked to inflammation in adipose tissue and increased hepcidin expression. 138 Hepcidin is a hormone that regulates iron absorption from the gut and iron release from macrophages. Increased hepcidin production in the brain can lead to decreased iron release from macrophages, which can contribute to brain iron deposition.

Over the years, obesity has been recognized not only as an independent risk factor for AD but also as a condition that exacerbates existing neuropathological changes. 142 However, the impact of obesity on brain iron levels and related outcomes such as neurodegenerative processes has not been thoroughly investigated. 143 , 144 Thus, obesity‐related iron accumulation in the brain is a newly emerging research area that is gaining attention for its potential connection to the development and progression of NDDs such as AD.

In 2019, a preliminary study examined the effects of diet‐induced obesity on iron levels in the brain, F2‐isoprostane concentration (a marker of oxidative stress), and α‐synuclein expression in specific brain regions. The study revealed that obesity led to significant variations in iron levels in the midbrain and thalamus, but not in the hippocampus or striatum when compared with the control group of mice. 143 Additionally, levels of neurodegenerative markers are increased in the midbrain. This study confirms that brain iron metabolism responds regionally to environmental stress, suggesting that obesity‐induced changes may be linked to neurodegeneration.

Excess iron can lead to dysfunction in adipose tissue and IR. 145 Studies have shown that markers of iron status in blood are linked to obesity and adipose tissue. 144 In another preliminary study, ferritin levels were positively correlated with both VAT and SAT and negatively correlated with hepatic fat content. 146 In line with this study, a study was conducted on 131 healthy subjects with and without obesity to evaluate the connection between iron status and changes in abdominal adipose tissue over 1 year. 140 The findings indicated that higher levels of serum hepcidin and ferritin were linked to increased VAT and SAT, whereas transferrin and TIBC were inversely associated with these changes. These connections were predominantly observed in women and non‐obese individuals and were not influenced by insulin sensitivity. This study indicated that serum hepcidin levels are associated with longitudinal changes in abdominal adipose tissue independent of insulin sensitivity. It is worth noting that adipocytes express high levels of transferrin, a key protein that binds iron in the blood, which is essential for adipocyte function and insulin sensitivity. 147

Moreover, recent research has revealed a connection between serum ferritin and increased IR in adipose tissue (adipose‐IR) as well as a higher lipid accumulation product (LAP) and visceral adiposity index (VAI). 148 This indicates that ferritin may serve as an early indicator of the potential development of adipose tissue dysfunction in obese. 148 Furthermore, increased serum ferritin and iron levels have been linked to decreased markers of adipocyte differentiation, and reducing iron levels through phlebotomy improves glucose tolerance. 149 This suggests changes in iron storage and chronic inflammation in individuals with obesity.

High body iron stores have been shown to affect fat growth in animals, hindering the formation of fat cells and the action of insulin. 140 , 150 Mice with obesity and diabetes had increased accumulation of iron in their fat tissue, which was linked to impaired fat cell development. 140 , 150 , 151

At the same time, although all these observations indicate a decrease in the GMV and/or a decrease in the CTh in different regions, such as the precuneus, the exact relationship between brain structure and obesity remains unclear. 123 Hence, there is a need for additional early neuroimaging biomarkers such as QSM.

2.2. Metabolic and chronic disorders, and related to the risk of AD

Iron is widely acknowledged to have a significant effect on the phenotypic expression of metabolic disorders. 140 , 146 In a human study, increased MRI markers of iron accumulation in adipose tissue were associated with a range of disorders such as obesity, IR, and adipose tissue dysfunction. 147 Furthermore, a recent study showed that low levels of iron in adipose tissue can restrict the absorption of intestinal fat and reduce the intake of calories in mice fed a high‐fat diet, highlighting the significance of adipose tissue iron in overall metabolism. 152 Thus, investigating the relationship between iron metabolism and temporal changes in obesity, IR, adipose tissue alteration, and other related metabolic and chronic disorders could help establish these indicators as predictors of body composition changes related to AD pathophysiology.

2.3. Leptin

In a previous study, the association between leptin and AD was explored. 135 Leptin, an adipocytokine primarily secreted by the adipose tissue, has been implicated in the regulation of appetite, energy expenditure, cognitive function, and inflammatory mechanisms associated with obesity. 135 , 153 Adipose tissues, including the VAT and SAT, release various adipokines including leptin, which may disrupt iron homeostasis in the brain and contribute to neuroinflammation. 154 In particular, VAT contributes to inflammation and IR, thereby affecting the cardiovascular health. 155 Additionally, adipokines released by VAT are associated with systemic inflammation and IR. 156 Specifically, higher amounts of VAT in midlife are linked to Alzheimer's development. 54 , 157 The potential impact of adipose tissue on neurodegenerative conditions such as AD is also under investigation. 158

2.4. Insulin resistance and diabetes

It is well established that obesity leads to systemic metabolic dysregulation, including IR and altered adipose tissue function. 159 IR occurs when there is an abnormal biological reaction to insulin stimulation, leading to disruption of various molecular pathways in the body's target tissues. 160 , 161 It has been suggested that IR may contribute to the pathogenesis of AD by influencing the clearance of Aβ peptides and the phosphorylation of tau protein. 130 , 162

Iron storage and adipose tissue inflammation are associated with IR and T2DM. 163 Insulin regulates glucose metabolism and has various roles in the brain, such as regulating the metabolism of neurons and glial cells, managing glucose levels, and influencing cognitive functions. 164 IR is a risk factor for neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment, and neuroimaging can reveal cerebral abnormalities associated with IR, including alterations in white matter (WM) microstructure, neural activity, brain volume, and brain metabolism over time. 164 , 165 , 166 Brain regions associated with IR pathophysiology are more prominent in the dorsal nervous system, such as the precuneus, cingulate cortex, occipital lobe, and WM tracts. 164 These structures are vulnerable to AD pathology and play a critical role in cognitive processes such as memory and executive functioning. 167 Patients with metabolic disorders, such as T2DM and obesity, exhibit higher variability in their results than asymptomatic individuals do. This could be attributed to the interplay between multifactorial components. 164 Overall, neuroimaging biomarkers are highly advantageous for detecting initial cerebral structure and functional abnormalities in brains with IR. These biomarkers provide crucial evidence for understanding the underlying neuronal changes involved in cognitive decline in IR.

2.5. Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

NAFLD is closely linked to obesity and can begin in childhood. 168 Research indicates that liver diseases, even in the early stages, may be associated with brain aging. 169 Changes in serum iron levels are common in adult NAFLD patients, leading to dysmetabolic iron overload syndrome. 168 Interest in the impact of NAFLD on brain health is growing due to shared risk factors with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity, as well as common underlying mechanisms such as inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. 169 NAFLD has been found to have an independent association with reduced brain activity and cognitive impairment, regardless of other concurrent health conditions. 169 Given the high prevalence of NAFLD, interventions targeting it, such as lifestyle changes and weight reduction, could help to prevent cognitive impairment.

A study using MRI to examine liver steatosis in male adolescents found that ferritin was associated with liver fat and VAT. 168 The study found that ferritin levels in obese male adolescents are primarily affected by liver fat and inflammation rather than body iron status. However, no association was observed between transferrin and soluble transferrin receptors, with ferritin levels of. 168 Adiposity has been linked to cognitive impairment, AD, and related disorders (ADRD). 134 , 170 BMI is commonly used to measure adiposity, but it may not accurately represent the regional fat distribution. 171 , 172 Studies suggest that cognitive impairment and dementia, specifically AD, are more likely to occur in individuals with varying fat deposits and regional fat distributions. 134 However, the cognitive outcomes associated with different fat deposits can vary, and these deposits can impact the brain in distinct ways.

In another study, a higher R2* value in adipose tissue, possibly indicating iron content, was correlated with liver iron stores in obese individuals. 173 Additionally, VAT iron levels appear to be linked to serum cholesterol levels in individuals with obesity. It is important to mention that, while VAT and NAFLD have been studied, they could be potential metabolic biomarkers for future studies on the accumulation of iron in the brain. This could include investigating hallmark anatomical regions, such as the precuneus, and their relationship with the risk of AD and related disorders. Overall, brain iron deposition can be increased in NAFLD due to the increased expression and function of hepcidin, IR, and oxidative stress.

2.6. Vascular risk factors

A significant risk factor for dementia and cognitive impairment is cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). 174 Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are frequently observed in individuals aged 45 years and above, with a prevalence rate of 5%–35%. 175 Tuladhar et al. 176 have identified specific brain areas, including the superior frontal gyrus, precuneus, superior occipital gyrus, thalamus, and putamen as crucial nodes of CSVD. Recent research has shown that iron accumulation in the precuneus is an independent risk factor for MCI in patients with CMBs. 177 This study found that the susceptibility values in the precuneus differed significantly between patients with CMBs and MCI and those without MCI. The accumulation of iron in distant rich‐club nodes owing to CMBs may be responsible for this difference. Logistic regression analysis revealed that only higher susceptibility values in the precuneus were associated with cognitive decline in patients with CMBs. 177 Additionally, in a comparative study involving patients with PD, those with MCI showed a higher level of vulnerability in the precuneus region, as indicated by voxel‐wise QSM results. This suggests that the precuneus may be a potential target area for future MCI research in PD patients. 178

2.7. Genetics risk factors

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a rare hereditary condition that affects the small blood vessels in the brain. 179 Mutations in neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3 (NOTCH3) are responsible for this condition, which poses a high risk of dementia and stroke in middle‐aged adults. 180 CADASIL can lead to cognitive, mood, and behavioral disruptions. 181 Dementia is usually diagnosed in the late stages, and cognitive impairment is uncommon, but can occur without significant vascular events. 182 , 183 Early onset dementia, which causes cognitive decline before the age of 65 years, can result from various factors such as familial AD (FAD) and metal metabolism disorders. 182

Conventional MRI shows features similar to those of CSVD and CMBs. 2 , 182 The most common MRI finding associated with CADASIL is hyperintensity in the basal ganglia and WM in T2‐w, primarily in the periventricular and parietal regions. 184 , 185 Two recent studies have provided insights into SVD pathology in FAD and the genetic complexity of AD and related dementia. 186 , 187 The first study revealed Aβ‐independent SVD pathology in presenilin 1 (PSEN1) FAD, which is similar to CADASIL but milder on MRI. 187 A second study identified a pathogenic NOTCH3 variant that causes CADASIL‐like features in an AD family, highlighting the genetic complexity of AD. 186 These findings underscore the interaction between genetic and vascular factors in understanding the clinical and pathological spectrum of AD and its related disorders.

On the other hand, iron accumulation in the brain is suggested as a pathophysiological mechanism in CADASIL, especially in deep GM. 179 , 188 , 189 This susceptibility signal in the putamen and caudate may serve as a biomarker of CADASIL severity. 179 , 188 Additionally, iron deposition in the basal ganglia is associated with cognitive dysfunction. 179 , 190 Therefore, iron accumulation and vascular changes in the brain may be potential factors in CADASIL, with studies suggesting that they may be linked to the severity of clinical disease and WM hyperintensity. 179 , 188

Kagerer et al. 191 identified a synergistic association between elevated magnetic susceptibility and the presence of the APOE‐ε4 gene, resulting in heightened default mode network (DMN) activity, particularly in the precuneus, PCC, and lateral parietal cortex. Another study by van Bergen et al. 192 observed that APOE‐ε4 carriers within the MCI group displayed significantly higher susceptibility in the precuneus and parietal regions than individuals without APOE‐ε4. Another recent study included 24 individuals who were not carriers of APOE‐ε4, 22 heterozygotes, and 20 homozygotes in the initial stages of AD. The study discovered that an increased APOE‐ε4 dose was linked to a reduction in the effective clearance of brain waste, such as Aβ and iron, through the blood–brain barrier. 193

Studies have found associations between APOE‐ε4 and heightened DMN activity, increased magnetic susceptibility in the precuneus and parietal regions, and decreased brain waste clearance. This evidence suggests that the presence of the APOE‐ε4 allele affects multiple mechanisms implicated in AD pathogenesis including neuroinflammation, vascular dysfunction, and amyloid beta accumulation.

2.8. Atypical AD evidence

Limited knowledge exists regarding the distribution of iron in atypical clinical presentations of AD, such as logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA). LPA is characterized by language deficits, including difficulty with word retrieval, repeating sentences, and phonological errors, while PCA involves visuospatial and visuoperceptual deficits. 39 , 194 , 195 Moderate evidence indicates greater precuneus susceptibility in both PCA and LPA. Strong evidence also suggests greater susceptibility in the precuneus in PCA than in typical AD (tAD). 39 PCA and LPA exhibited a higher susceptibility than tAD in the precuneus. This observation is consistent with previous research that links precuneus atrophy with the deterioration of autobiographical memory in PCA. 39 , 67 , 196 , 197 Another study revealed a connection between perceptual specifics of personal memory and GM density in the precuneus, located on the right side of the brain. 67 This suggests a correlation between certain areas of the brain and PCA (specific atrophy), 67 and an acceleration of this process may occur due to the deposition of iron. 198 , 199

However, further research is needed to determine whether increased iron deposition accelerates atrophy in the precuneus and contributes to deficits in language, memory, and visuospatial abilities observed in these AD variants.

3. IRON OVERLOAD/ACCUMULATION AND INCREASE RISK OF AD

Iron accumulation in the brain is frequently observed in different types of NDDs. 200 Histochemical and imaging studies have found iron accumulation in brain regions with histopathological alterations in AD patients, along with associations with Aβ aggregates, NFTs, and activated microglia. 3 , 109 , 117 , 118 , 199 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 Strong imaging evidence indicates that dysregulation of iron in the neuronal system and alterations in susceptibility could be significant hallmarks of AD development. 25 , 27 , 30 , 39 , 40 , 192 , 202 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 Iron has been found to be associated with amyloid plaques in conventional studies using ex vivo and in vivo mouse models. This was determined by analyzing the T2* properties and creating maps of the iron distribution. 38 , 118 , 223 , 224 , 225 Moreover, the loss of myelin in WM leads to an increase in susceptibility, bringing it closer to that of GM. 226 , 227 Demyelination and accumulation of iron contribute to increased susceptibility of local tissue susceptibility. 27 Therefore, a potential risk factor for AD is believed to be high levels of iron in the brain.

Excessive iron accumulation in the brain can initiate a chemical reaction called the Fenton reaction, leading to increased oxidative stress, which is a hallmark of AD. 228 This oxidative stress can activate programmed cell death pathways in neurons, causing damage to crucial proteins and lipids, ultimately resulting in synaptic dysfunction and the death of neuronal cells. 34 , 229 , 230 Current research highlights the significance of iron in the regulation of tau phosphorylation and aggregation, which in turn may contribute to the formation of neurofibrillary tangles in NDDs such as AD. 34 , 231 , 232 There appears to be a significant interaction between iron and tau, which influences disease progression and symptoms. 34 , 231 Interestingly, tau also binds to iron, leading to its aggregation and possible deposition as iron‐rich tangles in AD brains. 231 Moreover, elevated iron levels can increase tau phosphorylation in cultured neurons, suggesting a potential link between iron elevation and pathological tau in AD. 34 , 202 , 231 The findings of decreased total tau levels in the cortex of AD patients and the requirement of tau for the trafficking of APP to the neuronal membrane support the idea that disruptions in tau and APP levels can lead to the retention of iron in neurons, which is a hallmark of AD. 34 , 233

Ferroptosis is a form of the cell death pathway that is not related to apoptosis and is dependent on iron, which has noteworthy implications in NDDs. 234 Although they are distinct from apoptosis and autophagy, they share common protein molecules. 234 , 235 Current research has focused on understanding ferroptosis and its interplay with these pathways, thereby providing insights into its mechanisms and potential therapeutic approaches. 234 , 236 Ferroptosis occurs due to failure in the clearance of lipid peroxides, the presence of redox‐active iron, and oxidation of phospholipids containing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). 234 The regulation of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses is controlled by iron metabolism and lipid peroxidation signaling, which are the central mediators of ferroptosis. In addition, elevated iron levels can induce ferroptosis independently of free radical toxicity, holding therapeutic promise through iron chelation or uptake inhibition. 140 , 234 , 237 Moreover, iron chelation inhibits adipocyte differentiation without iron overload but can be reversed by transferrin or other iron donors, such as lactoferrin. 140 , 238 Deferoxamine's iron chelation improves adipogenesis, reduces oxidative stress, inflammation, and adipocyte hypertrophy, and enhances insulin action. 140 , 149 , 239

Iron overload and protein disorders related to iron metabolism are closely associated with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). 240 This overload can lead to autophagic death and ferroptosis as well as promote tau protein phosphorylation, resulting in nerve fiber tangles and increasing the risk of NDDs such as AD and PD in patients with TBI. In addition, it can damage neural network. 240

Aβ, a peptide fragment derived from the amyloid precursor protein, aggregates to form insoluble amyloid plaques in the brains of AD patients. 206 MRI has been used to detect these plaques, primarily due to the presence of iron. 201 , 206 , 241 Moreover, QSM has been conducted to explore the connection between iron deposition and the accumulation of amyloid, using amyloid PET as a diagnostic tool. 38 , 242 , 243 However, experiments have demonstrated that Aβ is diamagnetic and can create strong contrasts on susceptibility maps. 3 , 206 , 244 Researchers have used QSM to monitor iron deposition and Aβ accumulation in an AD transgenic mouse model. 206 QSM also allows the visualization of individual Aβ plaques and provides a contrast for identifying their deposition and iron. Diamagnetic properties of Aβ have also been observed in brain specimens from AD patients. 180 In line with these results, Ahmed et al. 245 used the diamagnetic compartment susceptibility (DCS) from DECOMPOSE‐QSM to track pathological changes in AD. DCS is affected by protein accumulation and demyelination, and a lower absolute value in WM indicates a loss of WM integrity. This study suggests that compartmentalized magnetic susceptibility can provide more holistic information about AD pathogenesis and shows lower DCS values in patients with amnestic dementia than in HCs. Together, these advancements in QSM may help diagnose and track AD‐driven neurodegeneration by non‐invasive assessment of Aβ aggregation and iron deposition.

Furthermore, a recent study using QSM and tau‐PET demonstrated a connection between iron and tau accumulation in 236 patients with amyloid‐β pathology. 202 This study showed that differences in magnetic susceptibility attributed to increased iron content were consistently associated with tau‐PET signals in regions affected by AD. This study suggests that the accumulation of iron in the brain can affect the development of AD by mediating the relationship between tau‐PET and cortical atrophy. Furthermore, this study found that younger participants (aged ≤65 years) had a stronger association between quantitative susceptibility and tau‐PET. These findings support the idea that iron deposition, tau aggregation, and neurodegeneration are interrelated in AD, and highlight the role of iron dysregulation in the disease process.

Iron plays a critical role in promoting optimal behavioral organization, and its deficiency can impede brain myelination and hinder monoamine metabolism. 246 , 247 Changes in brain iron status affect glutamate and γ‐aminobutyric acid homeostasis, causing deficits in memory, learning, motor skills, and emotional and psychological problems. 246 Iron metabolism influences emotional behavior through region‐specific control, neurotransmitter regulation, oxidative stress responses, and interactions between iron and other metals. 246 , 247 In a recent study, the authors examined the relationship between the QSM measurements and AD markers in 421 participants. 38 The results in line with previous studies showed that older age and cognitive impairment were associated with increased susceptibility in certain brain regions, particularly the deep and inferior gray nuclei. 30 , 192 , 216 , 217 , 242 , 243 Higher susceptibility was also linked to higher levels of amyloid and tau PET, as well as lower cortical GMV in the medial temporal lobe. 38 These findings suggest that susceptibility to specific brain regions may be indicative of cognitive decline, and the presence of amyloids and tau.

4. QUANTITATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING

Conventional MRI cannot accurately show the amount of damage, such as iron deposition, in different components of the central nervous system (CNS), including glia, axons, and myelin. 248 Magnetic susceptibility is a novel contrast type used in MRI, which differs from other conventional MRI techniques. 229 Diamagnetic materials exhibit negative susceptibility. Conversely, paramagnetic materials have a positive susceptibility, which means that they are attracted by an applied magnetic field. 27 The magnetic properties of biological tissues are intricately linked to their molecular composition and microstructure; consequently, they can exhibit diamagnetic or paramagnetic behavior. 27 , 249 Most biological substances are slightly diamagnetic, causing small negative susceptibility changes. 250 However, iron stored in brain tissue and deoxyhemoglobin in venous blood are highly paramagnetic, resulting in a strong magnetic field. 251

Iron is the main contributor to magnetic susceptibility in various brain structures, particularly the GM. 32 , 252 QSM has been used to map the distribution of iron in positive susceptibility (paramagnetic) tissues. 245 , 253 Changes in myelin and neurodegeneration‐related accumulation of Aβ or proteins lead to negative susceptibility values in QSM. 245 , 254 Despite their colocalization, multiple studies have contradicted the theory that diamagnetic and paramagnetic sources in the brains of patients with AD may affect QSM values. In 2012, Langkammer et al. discovered a strong correlation between the concentration of iron in post‐mortem tissue and the bulk magnetic susceptibility in GM structures. This suggests that iron content is a significant contributor to the bulk of the QSM signal. 32 Similarly, another study found that there are minimal counteracting effects of paramagnetic and diamagnetic sources when examining differences in susceptibility signatures in AD cases. 255 These findings support the earlier work of Hallgren and Sourander, who found that iron is the dominant source of magnetic susceptibility in GM. 256 Therefore, the QSM can be a valuable tool for tracking brain iron deposition. 18

QSM uses phase signals generated by materials with magnetic susceptibilities different from those of the surrounding tissues. 257 , 258 However, phase images cannot be used without additional processing. Phase unwrapping is necessary to handle the dynamic range of “−π to π,” while background field removal is required to address susceptibility differences at tissue‐air boundaries. 3 , 259 QSM phase signals are produced by dipole interactions, which occur when materials with varying magnetic susceptibilities are exposed to an external magnetic field. 3 , 239 Magnetic susceptibility, which reflects the degree of magnetization, plays a crucial role in this phenomenon. 3 Phase imaging provides a unique contrast between gray matter, white matter, iron‐laden tissues, venous blood vessels, and other tissues with biologically specific magnetic susceptibilities that differ from those of the background tissues. 18 , 27

SWI is a diagnostic technique that capitalizes on the unique magnetic properties of local fields to enhance image contrast and increase the visibility of a wide range of susceptibility sources. 260 , 261 SWI serves as a precursor to the concept of QSM. 3 In SWI, phase images are utilized to generate weighting masks, which are then combined with magnitude images to amplify the susceptibility contrast. 261 However, SWI is limited by its qualitative nature, as it measures the combined value of the magnitude and homodyne‐filtered phase signals. 3 The development of QSM has addressed the limitations of accurately assessing magnetic susceptibility in statistical image analyses. 3 , 262 This was made possible by solving a complex field‐to‐source inversion problem that separated the local magnetic field from nonlocal contributions. QSM also employs advanced inference techniques to create voxel‐wise maps of mean tissue susceptibility. 18

Several recent studies concluded that QSM has the potential to offer valuable pathophysiological insights into the properties of brain tissue and can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of novel therapeutics in clinical settings for early detection of AD. 3 , 30 , 38 , 202 , 206 , 216 , 263 QSM is a high‐resolution post‐processing MRI technique used to measure local tissue magnetic susceptibility, which is sensitive to metal magnetic susceptibility, such as iron (Figure 2). 3 , 264 QSM can accurately measure the magnetic susceptibility of tissues, which indirectly reflects the iron content in the brain. QSM generates a high‐resolution voxel‐wise map of the average magnetic susceptibility of tissues, providing a more precise and informative measurement of brain iron content than conventional imaging techniques. 39 , 262 Tissue magnetic susceptibilities can be characterized using QSM, which has various applications, including measuring iron deposition and myelination, quantifying venous oxygen saturation, and assessing blood–brain barrier function. 3 , 265 It is worth noting that PET is a high‐accuracy method to detect pathology in AD, but it has some limitations, such as low spatial resolution and exposure to radiation. 38 Therefore, QSM measurements serve as a complementary technique for overcoming these limitations. 245

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The general post‐processing pipeline of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction steps.

The Electromagnetic Tissue Properties Study Group of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) recommends the use of QSM for clinical brain research. 266 The group has provided guidelines for the acquisition, processing, analysis, and publication of QSM data. To obtain accurate results, it is recommended to use a monopolar 3D multi‐echo gradient echo sequence and save the phase images in the DICOM format. A brain mask with phase quality‐based masking should be utilized to remove background fields, and techniques such as Sophisticated Harmonic Artifact Reduction for Phase data (SHARP) or projection onto Dipole Fields (PDF) should be applied to remove any remaining background fields within the mask. Finally, the susceptibility values should be measured relative to the reference region to ensure the accuracy of the results.

5. EMERGING ALTERATIONS IN THE PRECUNEUS/POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX

5.1. Magnetic susceptibility patterns

A preliminary QSM study suggested significant differences in magnetic susceptibility between patients with AD and matched HCs in the deep brain nuclei, especially in the putamen, and the posterior GM and WM regions in both regional and whole‐brain cross‐sectional comparisons. 216 In the cortical areas, the greatest increase in susceptibility values with age occurred in regions responsible for cognitive processing, such as the precuneus. 15 The accumulation of iron in the basal ganglia showed a linear trend, whereas iron accumulation in the precuneus followed a quadratic or exponential pattern. 15 Notably, a phase‐shift study revealed that there is a positive correlation between iron concentration in the parietal cortex and the severity of cognitive impairment in AD patients. 267 This finding suggests that iron concentration can be utilized as a biomarker to assess the progression of AD. This is aligned with a recent study that suggests that brain iron accumulation (BIA) occurs in areas such as the precuneus in AD. 26

Kim et al. 30 investigated the susceptibility of the precuneus in differentiating early‐stage AD and aMCI from HCs. Their findings indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85, which suggests a high level of accuracy in distinguishing AD patients from HCs. QSM values increased in the aMCI and AD groups, whereas GMVs decreased. The QSM was more effective in distinguishing individuals with aMCI from cognitively normal individuals in specific brain regions. Changes in the QSM values of these lesions in AD and amyloid‐beta‐cingulate gyrus may indicate the contribution of both amyloid accumulation and NFTs. 30 , 268 Susceptibility alterations start in the aMCI stage, making QSM values in the precuneus and allocortex better than GMV values for investigating early brain changes. 30 According to this study, QSM has the potential to serve as a valuable supplementary imaging technique for the timely detection of AD, especially in areas where Aβ and iron accumulate.

Another study that used high‐resolution 7 Tesla T2*‐w imaging found an increased peak‐to‐peak phase shift in all lobar regions of patients with early onset AD (EOAD) than in patients with late‐onset AD (LOAD). 269 The regional mean phase contrast in patients with EOAD was higher in the parietal subregions, especially in the precuneus. This indicates an increased accumulation of iron, which may be related to higher amyloid deposition in specific cortical regions than in patients with LOAD.

Taken together, the QSM studies revealed significant differences in magnetic susceptibility between patients with AD and HCs in the posterior GM and WM regions, suggesting greater iron accumulation in the dorsal nervous system, including the precuneus. Thus, QSM values can better distinguish early AD changes from GMV values, and may be a useful tool for early AD diagnosis.

5.2. Phase difference‐enhanced (PADRE) imaging

Phase difference‐enhanced (PADRE) imaging was expanded to enhance the phase differences between the target and surrounding tissues, allowing visualization of the target tissue. 270 This technique has been used to differentiate the pathologies of CNS diseases and detect early pathological changes in certain NDDs. 271 , 272 Some studies based on PADRE imaging have been conducted. One study found a significant positive correlation between Amyloid‐β‐enhancing PADRE imaging and the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of amyloid PET in the precuneus and cuneus, suggesting its potential for predicting the SUVR of amyloid PET. 271 Another study indicated the feasibility of using PADRE imaging at 3T to differentiate between AD patients and control subjects. 273 In a visual evaluation of PADRE images enhanced for amyloid‐β, areas of hypointensity were more pronounced within the cerebral cortex of AD patients than in HCs. 273

In general, initial studies have suggested that PADRE imaging correlates with amyloid PET for detecting AD pathology and may distinguish AD from HCs, demonstrating its potential as a noninvasive alternative to PET for AD diagnosis and prognosis.

5.3. Cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption and oxygen extraction fraction

Blood vessels in the brain play a crucial role in AD. 274 Monitoring central venous oxygenation can serve as a new way to study how the brain's blood flow is affected, helping us understand vascular disorders that impact oxygen supply. 3 , 275 Physiological variables such as CBF, oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO2) are crucial for understanding brain oxygen utilization, blood supply, and energy consumption (Equation 1). 40 These parameters are potential biomarkers of AD, with most arterial spin labeling (ASL) studies showing a decrease in CBF. 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 Distinguishing between vascular cognitive impairment and AD is challenging because of overlapping underlying causes. However, changes in brain OEF can help differentiate between the two. 3 , 276

CMRO2=CBF×OEF×Ha (1)

The CMRO2 was measured in μmol/100 g/min. CBF was measured in mL/min/100 g. The OEF was expressed as a percentage. [H]a = 7.377 μmol/mL is the molar concentration of oxygenated heme in an arteriole with hematocrit (Hct) = 0.357. 40

A recent study aimed to evaluate the whole‐brain patterns of OEF, CBF, and CMRO2 perturbation in AD. 40 The researchers used the cluster analysis of time evolution and tissue composition (CCTV) algorithm, which combines QSM and quantitative blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) models (QQ) to calculate OEF. 40 The results showed that CMRO2 and CBF values were significantly decreased in AD patients, predominantly in the bilateral precuneus gyrus, angular gyrus, and parietal–temporal regions. Regional analysis revealed decreased CBF and CMRO2 in the bilateral caudal and left rostral hippocampi. This study suggests that CMRO2 mapping could be a potential biomarker for AD and a useful tool for monitoring cognitive impairment. On the other hand, QSM is used to measure venous oxygen saturation, allowing the calculation of CMRO2 and OEF. 40 , 277 , 278

6. CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY

Substantial neuroimaging evidence indicates that the precuneus/posterior parietal cortex is vulnerable in early AD pathogenesis. Emerging findings using QSM demonstrate greater iron deposition compared to HCs, even at the MCI stage. Our evidence is supported by previous MR neuroimaging findings such as hypoperfusion, atrophy, cortical thinning, and connectivity disruption in the precuneus. Additionally, metabolic disorders such as obesity, high VAT, diabetes, and NAFLD are associated with this imaging evidence. Iron overload can promote several pathogenic processes implicated in AD, including amyloid aggregation, lipid peroxidation, tau phosphorylation, and neuronal death pathways such as ferroptosis. Higher magnetic susceptibility is also associated with metabolic risk factors such as obesity, IR, and vascular pathology.

Current research on iron accumulation and AD in the precuneus using QSM is emerging and promising, but there are limitations to address in future studies. Standardized QSM implementation processing is necessary to more accurately distinguish AD from MCI or HCs. Moreover, ongoing longitudinal studies are warranted to determine how iron accumulation measured by QSM translates into disease progression and cognitive decline.

Together, these findings suggest that iron accumulation, measurable through QSM, may accelerate pathogenesis in a sensitive hub region, contributing to downstream atrophy and cognitive deficits. As an early non‐invasive neuroimaging biomarker of iron burden and oxidative stress, QSM holds promise for improving early diagnosis, tracking disease stages, and monitoring therapeutic responses in AD and related dementias

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

SM: conceptualization, methodology/study design, software, data curation, writing – original draft preparation, visualization, investigation, validation, formal analysis, writing – reviewing, and editing. SG: conceptualization, methodology/study design, software, data curation, writing – original draft preparation, visualization, investigation, validation, formal analysis, writing – reviewing, and editing. FF: supervision, validation, writing – reviewing, and editing.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

None of the human or animal subjects were included in this study.

Mohammadi S, Ghaderi S, Fatehi F. Iron accumulation/overload and Alzheimer's disease risk factors in the precuneus region: A comprehensive narrative review. Aging Med. 2024;7:649‐667. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12363

Sana Mohammadi and Sadegh Ghaderi contributed equally to this work.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Diamantopoulos M. Behavioral and psychological changes in Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative disorders. In: Vlamos P, Kotsireas IS, Tarnanas I, eds. Handbook of Computational Neurodegeneration. Springer International Publishing; 2020:1‐30. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75479-6_2-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. DeTure MA, Dickson DW. The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13024-019-0333-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Uchida Y, Kan H, Sakurai K, Oishi K, Matsukawa N. Quantitative susceptibility mapping as an imaging biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: the expectations and limitations. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:938092. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.938092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dementia. Accessed November 13, 2023. https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/dementia
  • 5. 2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(4):700‐789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kumar A, Sidhu J, Goyal A, Tsao JW. Alzheimer disease. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed November 13, 2023. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499922/ [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission. Lancet (London, England). 2020;396(10248):413‐446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. International AD , Patterson C. World Alzheimer Report 2018: The state of the art of dementia research: New frontiers. Published online September 21, 2018. Accessed December 24, 2023. https://www.alzint.org/resource/world‐alzheimer‐report‐2018/
  • 9. Gustavsson A, Norton N, Fast T, et al. Global estimates on the number of persons across the Alzheimer's disease continuum. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(2):658‐670. doi: 10.1002/alz.12694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Suresh S, Singh SA, Rushendran R, Vellapandian C, Prajapati B. Alzheimer's disease: the role of extrinsic factors in its development, an investigation of the environmental enigma. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1303111. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1303111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bano D, Ehninger D, Bagetta G. Decoding metabolic signatures in Alzheimer's disease: a mitochondrial perspective. Cell Death Dis. 2023;9:432. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01732-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Eid A, Mhatre I, Richardson JR. Gene‐environment interactions in Alzheimer's disease: a potential path to precision medicine. Pharmacol Ther. 2019;199:173‐187. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Acosta‐Cabronero J, Betts MJ, Cardenas‐Blanco A, Yang S, Nestor PJ. In vivo MRI mapping of brain iron deposition across the adult lifespan. J Neurosci. 2016;36(2):364‐374. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1907-15.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Betts MJ, Acosta‐Cabronero J, Cardenas‐Blanco A, Nestor PJ, Düzel E. High‐resolution characterisation of the aging brain using simultaneous quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R2* measurements at 7T. Neuroimage. 2016;138:43‐63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Burgetova R, Dusek P, Burgetova A, et al. Age‐related magnetic susceptibility changes in deep grey matter and cerebral cortex of normal young and middle‐aged adults depicted by whole brain analysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11(9):3906‐3919. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Chen L, Soldan A, Oishi K, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of brain iron and β‐amyloid in MRI and PET relating to cognitive performance in cognitively normal older adults. Radiology. 2021;298(2):353‐362. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Liu JL, Fan YG, Yang ZS, Wang ZY, Guo C. Iron and Alzheimer's disease: from pathogenesis to therapeutic implications. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:632. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ravanfar P, Loi SM, Syeda WT, et al. Systematic review: quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of brain iron profile in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:618435. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.618435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chen Z, Zhong C. Decoding Alzheimer's disease from perturbed cerebral glucose metabolism: implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;108:21‐43. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ghaderi S, Mohammadi S, Nezhad NJ, Karami S, Sayehmiri F. Iron quantification in basal ganglia: quantitative susceptibility mapping as a potential biomarker for Alzheimer's disease‐a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1338891. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1338891/abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Andreini C, Putignano V, Rosato A, Banci L. The human iron‐proteome. Metallomics. 2018;10(9):1223‐1231. doi: 10.1039/c8mt00146d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wang F, Wang J, Shen Y, Li H, Rausch WD, Huang X. Iron dyshomeostasis and ferroptosis: a new Alzheimer's disease hypothesis? Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:830569. Accessed November 15, 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2022.830569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tian Y, Tian Y, Yuan Z, et al. Iron metabolism in aging and age‐related diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):3612. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sousa L, Oliveira MM, Pessôa MTC, Barbosa LA. Iron overload: effects on cellular biochemistry. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;504:180‐189. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.11.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ward RJ, Zucca FA, Duyn JH, Crichton RR, Zecca L. The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(10):1045‐1060. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70117-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Rao IY, Hanson LR, Johnson JC, Rosenbloom MH, Frey WH. Brain glucose hypometabolism and iron accumulation in different brain regions in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15(5):551. doi: 10.3390/ph15050551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Liu C, Li W, Tong KA, Yeom KW, Kuzminski S. Susceptibility‐weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(1):23‐41. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Dusek P, Dezortova M, Wuerfel J. Chapter nine – imaging of iron. In: Bhatia KP, Schneider SA, eds. International Review of Neurobiology. Vol 110. Metal Related Neurodegenerative Disease. Academic Press; 2013:195‐239. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-410502-7.00010-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Wang Y, Liu T. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(1):82‐101. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kim HG, Park S, Rhee HY, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping to evaluate the early stage of Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage Clin. 2017;16:429‐438. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.08.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ghaderi S, Fatehi F, Kalra S, Mohammadi S, Batouli SAH. Quantitative susceptibility mapping in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: automatic quantification of the magnetic susceptibility in the subcortical nuclei. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2024;3:1‐12. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21678421.2024.2372648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Langkammer C, Schweser F, Krebs N, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study. Neuroimage. 2012;62(3):1593‐1599. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhang Y, Wang M, Chang W. Iron dyshomeostasis and ferroptosis in Alzheimer's disease: molecular mechanisms of cell death and novel therapeutic drugs and targets for AD. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:983623. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.983623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ayton S, Lei P, Bush AI. Biometals and their therapeutic implications in Alzheimer's disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12(1):109‐120. doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0312-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Petrella JR. Neuroimaging and the search for a cure for Alzheimer disease. Radiology. 2013;269(3):671‐691. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Marcus C, Mena E, Subramaniam RM. Brain PET in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39(10):e413‐e426. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ali DG, Bahrani AA, Barber JM, et al. Amyloid‐PET levels in the precuneus and posterior cingulate cortices are associated with executive function scores in preclinical Alzheimer's disease prior to overt global amyloid positivity. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;88(3):1127‐1135. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cogswell PM, Wiste HJ, Senjem ML, et al. Associations of quantitative susceptibility mapping with Alzheimer's disease clinical and imaging markers. Neuroimage. 2021;224:117433. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Singh NA, Arani A, Graff‐Radford J, et al. Distinct brain iron profiles associated with logopenic progressive aphasia and posterior cortical atrophy. Neuroimage Clin. 2022;36:103161. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Yang A, Zhuang H, Du L, et al. Evaluation of whole‐brain oxygen metabolism in Alzheimer's disease using QSM and quantitative BOLD. Neuroimage. 2023;282:120381. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Agnollitto MISS, Leoni RF, Foss MP, et al. Influence of cerebral blood flow on volumetric loss related to Alzheimer's disease. Dement Neuropsychol. 2023;17:e20230004. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Soman S, Raghavan S, Rajesh P, et al. Relationship between cerebral perfusion on arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI with brain volumetry and cognitive performance in mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2021;24(4):559‐565. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_848_20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Verclytte S, Lopes R, Viard R, et al. Differences in cortical perfusion detected by arterial spin labeling in nonamnestic and amnestic subtypes of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroradiol. 2020;47(4):284‐291. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Thomas B, Sheelakumari R, Kannath S, Sarma S, Menon RN. Regional cerebral blood flow in the posterior cingulate and precuneus and the entorhinal cortical atrophy score differentiate mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(10):1658‐1664. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Huang Q, Cao X, Chai X, Wang X, Xu L, Xiao C. Three‐dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling and susceptibility‐weighted imaging associated with clinical progression in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Medicine. 2019;98(23):e15972. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Riederer I, Bohn KP, Preibisch C, et al. Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment: integrated pulsed arterial spin‐labeling MRI and 18F‐FDG PET. Radiology. 2018;288(1):198‐206. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Le Heron CJ, Wright SL, Melzer TR, et al. Comparing cerebral perfusion in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease dementia: an ASL‐MRI study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34(6):964‐970. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Binnewijzend MAA, Kuijer JPA, Benedictus MR, et al. Cerebral blood flow measured with 3D pseudocontinuous arterial spin‐labeling MR imaging in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment: a marker for disease severity. Radiology. 2013;267(1):221‐230. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Alexopoulos P, Sorg C, Förschler A, et al. Perfusion abnormalities in mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia in Alzheimer's disease measured by pulsed arterial spin labeling MRI. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012;262(1):69‐77. doi: 10.1007/s00406-011-0226-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Dai W, Lopez OL, Carmichael OT, Becker JT, Kuller LH, Gach HM. Mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: patterns of altered cerebral blood flow at MR imaging. Radiology. 2009;250(3):856‐866. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503080751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Alsop DC, Casement M, de Bazelaire C, Fong T, Press DZ. Hippocampal hyperperfusion in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2008;42(4):1267‐1274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Asllani I, Habeck C, Scarmeas N, Borogovac A, Brown TR, Stern Y. Multivariate and univariate analysis of continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in Alzheimer's disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28(4):725‐736. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Li H, Huang Z, Gao Z, et al. Sex difference in general cognition associated with coupling of whole‐brain functional connectivity strength to cerebral blood flow changes during Alzheimer's disease progression. Neuroscience. 2023;509:187‐200. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Dolatshahi M, Commean PK, Rahmani F, et al. Alzheimer disease pathology and neurodegeneration in midlife obesity: a pilot study. Aging Dis. 2024;15:1843‐1854. doi: 10.14336/AD.2023.0707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Bede P, Omer T, Finegan E, et al. Connectivity‐based characterisation of subcortical grey matter pathology in frontotemporal dementia and ALS: a multimodal neuroimaging study. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018;12(6):1696‐1707. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9837-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Medic N, Ziauddeen H, Ersche KD, et al. Increased body mass index is associated with specific regional alterations in brain structure. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40(7):1177‐1182. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Whitwell JL, Przybelski S, Weigand SD, et al. 3D maps from multiple MRI illustrate changing atrophy patterns as subjects progress from MCI to AD. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 7):1777‐1786. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Villain N, Fouquet M, Baron JC, et al. Sequential relationships between grey matter and white matter atrophy and brain metabolic abnormalities in early Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2010;133(11):3301‐3314. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Möller C, Vrenken H, Jiskoot L, et al. Different patterns of gray matter atrophy in early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(8):2014‐2022. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Canu E, Frisoni GB, Agosta F, Pievani M, Bonetti M, Filippi M. Early and late onset Alzheimer's disease patients have distinct patterns of white matter damage. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(6):1023‐1033. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Cho H, Jeon S, Kang SJ, et al. Longitudinal changes of cortical thickness in early‐ versus late‐onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(7):1921.e9‐1921.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Kim EJ, Cho SS, Jeong Y, et al. Glucose metabolism in early onset versus late onset Alzheimer's disease: an SPM analysis of 120 patients. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 8):1790‐1801. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Scahill RI, Schott JM, Stevens JM, Rossor MN, Fox NC. Mapping the evolution of regional atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: unbiased analysis of fluid‐registered serial MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(7):4703‐4707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052587399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Duan W, Sehrawat P, Balachandrasekaran A, et al. Cerebral blood flow is associated with diagnostic class and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76(3):1103‐1120. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Sheelakumari R, Kesavadas C, Lekha VS, Justus S, Sarma PS, Menon R. Structural correlates of mild cognitive impairment: a clinicovolumetric study. Neurol India. 2018;66(2):370‐376. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.227298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Benzinger TLS, Blazey T, Jack CR, et al. Regional variability of imaging biomarkers in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(47):E4502‐E4509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317918110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ahmed S, Irish M, Loane C, et al. Association between precuneus volume and autobiographical memory impairment in posterior cortical atrophy: beyond the visual syndrome. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;18:822‐834. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Rohrer JD, Caso F, Mahoney C, et al. Patterns of longitudinal brain atrophy in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Brain Lang. 2013;127(2):121‐126. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Chetelat G, Baron JC. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: contribution of structural neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2003;18(2):525‐541. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00026-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Bernardes R, da Silva FS, Oliveira Barbosa JH, Rondinoni C, et al. Neuro‐degeneration profile of Alzheimer's patients: a brain morphometry study. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;15:15‐24. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Lehmann M, Rohrer JD, Clarkson MJ, et al. Reduced cortical thickness in the posterior cingulate gyrus is characteristic of both typical and atypical Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(2):587‐598. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Yang H, Xu H, Li Q, et al. Study of brain morphology change in Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment compared with normal controls. Gen Psychiatr. 2019;32(2):e100005. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2018-100005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Weston PSJ, Nicholas JM, Lehmann M, et al. Presymptomatic cortical thinning in familial Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2016;87(19):2050‐2057. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Zhang Q, Wang Q, He C, et al. Altered regional cerebral blood flow and brain function across the Alzheimer's disease Spectrum: a potential biomarker. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2021.630382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Koch G, Casula EP, Bonnì S, et al. Precuneus magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, sham‐controlled trial. Brain. 2022;145(11):3776‐3786. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Yan S, Qi Z, An Y, Zhang M, Qian T, Lu J. Detecting perfusion deficit in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment patients by resting‐state fMRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(4):1099‐1104. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Klaassens BL, van Gerven JMA, van der Grond J, de Vos F, Möller C, Rombouts SARB. Diminished posterior precuneus connectivity with the default mode network differentiates Normal aging from Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:97. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Yokoi T, Watanabe H, Yamaguchi H, et al. Involvement of the precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex is significant for the development of Alzheimer's disease: a PET (THK5351, PiB) and resting fMRI study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:304. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Lee ES, Yoo K, Lee YB, et al. Default mode network functional connectivity in early and late mild cognitive impairment: results from the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016;30(4):289‐296. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Schroeter ML, Godulla J, Thiel F, et al. Heart failure decouples the precuneus in interaction with social cognition and executive functions. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28338-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Prawiroharjo P, Yamashita K, Yamashita K, et al. Disconnection of the right superior parietal lobule from the precuneus is associated with memory impairment in oldest‐old Alzheimer's disease patients. Heliyon. 2020;6(7):e04516. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Hill VB, Cankurtaran CZ, Liu BP, et al. A practical review of functional MRI anatomy of the language and motor systems. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(7):1084‐1090. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Bruner E, Jacobs HIL. Alzheimer's disease: the downside of a highly evolved parietal lobe? J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;35(2):227‐240. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Contador J, Pérez‐Millán A, Tort‐Merino A, et al. Longitudinal brain atrophy and CSF biomarkers in early‐onset Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;32:102804. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Williamson J, James SA, Mukli P, et al. Sex difference in brain functional connectivity of hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease. GeroScience. 2023;25:563‐572. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00943-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Dickerson BC, Sperling RA. Functional abnormalities of the medial temporal lobe memory system in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: insights from functional MRI studies. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(6):1624‐1635. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Freton M, Lemogne C, Bergouignan L, Delaveau P, Lehéricy S, Fossati P. The eye of the self: precuneus volume and visual perspective during autobiographical memory retrieval. Brain Struct Funct. 2014;219(3):959‐968. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0546-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 3):564‐583. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Ma HR, Pan PL, Sheng LQ, et al. Aberrant pattern of regional cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease: a voxel‐wise meta‐analysis of arterial spin labeling MR imaging studies. Oncotarget. 2017;8(54):93196‐93208. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Steinman J, Sun HS, Feng ZP. Microvascular alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;14:618986. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.618986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Solis E, Hascup KN, Hascup ER. Alzheimer's disease: the link between amyloid‐β and neurovascular dysfunction. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76(4):1179‐1198. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Huang CW, Hsu SW, Chang YT, et al. Cerebral perfusion insufficiency and relationships with cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease: a multiparametric neuroimaging study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19387-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Ebrahimpour S, Zakeri M, Esmaeili A. Crosstalk between obesity, diabetes, and alzheimer's disease: introducing quercetin as an effective triple herbal medicine. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;62:101095. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Cheon SY, Song J. Novel insights into non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease and dementia: insulin resistance, hyperammonemia, gut dysbiosis, vascular impairment, and inflammation. Cell Biosci. 2022;12:99. doi: 10.1186/s13578-022-00836-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. de la Monte SM, Tong M. Brain metabolic dysfunction at the core of Alzheimer's disease. Biochem Pharmacol. 2014;88(4):548‐559. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.12.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Cimini FA, Perluigi M, Barchetta I, Cavallo MG, Barone E. Role of biliverdin reductase a in the regulation of insulin signaling in metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases: an update. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(10):5574. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Younossi Z, Tacke F, Arrese M, et al. Global perspectives on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2019;69(6):2672‐2682. doi: 10.1002/hep.30251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Saklayen MG. The global epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s11906-018-0812-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88‐98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Fahed G, Aoun L, Zerdan MB, et al. Metabolic syndrome: updates on pathophysiology and management in 2021. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):786. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Rohm TV, Meier DT, Olefsky JM, Donath MY. Inflammation in obesity, diabetes and related disorders. Immunity. 2022;55(1):31‐55. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Cai H, Cong WN, Ji S, Rothman S, Maudsley S, Martin B. Metabolic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease and related neurodegenerative disorders. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9(1):5‐17. doi: 10.2174/156720512799015064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Hilton C, Sabaratnam R, Drakesmith H, Karpe F. Iron, glucose and fat metabolism and obesity: an intertwined relationship. Int J Obes (Lond). 2023;47(7):554‐563. doi: 10.1038/s41366-023-01299-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Whitcher B, Thanaj M, Cule M, et al. Precision MRI phenotyping enables detection of small changes in body composition for longitudinal cohorts. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07556-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Ficiarà E, Munir Z, Boschi S, Caligiuri ME, Guiot C. Alteration of iron concentration in Alzheimer's disease as a possible diagnostic biomarker unveiling ferroptosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4479. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Gomez G, Beason‐Held LL, Bilgel M, et al. Metabolic syndrome and amyloid accumulation in the aging brain. J Alzheimer's Dis. 2018;65(2):629‐639. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Lee J. Mild cognitive impairment in relation to Alzheimer's disease: an investigation of principles, classifications, ethics, and problems. Neuroethics. 2023;16(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s12152-023-09522-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Brier MR, Gordon B, Friedrichsen K, et al. Tau and Aβ imaging, CSF measures, and cognition in Alzheimer's disease. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(338):338ra66. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Aillaud I, Funke SA. Tau aggregation inhibiting peptides as potential therapeutics for Alzheimer disease. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2023;43(3):951‐961. doi: 10.1007/s10571-022-01230-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Roda AR, Serra‐Mir G, Montoliu‐Gaya L, Tiessler L, Villegas S. Amyloid‐beta peptide and tau protein crosstalk in Alzheimer's disease. Neural Regen Res. 2022;17(8):1666‐1674. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.332127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Pourhamzeh M, Joghataei MT, Mehrabi S, et al. The interplay of tau protein and β‐amyloid: while tauopathy spreads more profoundly than amyloidopathy, both processes are almost equally pathogenic. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2021;41(6):1339‐1354. doi: 10.1007/s10571-020-00906-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 112. Ahmad W, Ijaz B, Shabbiri K, Ahmed F, Rehman S. Oxidative toxicity in diabetes and Alzheimer's disease: mechanisms behind ROS/ RNS generation. J Biomed Sci. 2017;24(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12929-017-0379-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Manoharan S, Guillemin GJ, Abiramasundari RS, Essa MM, Akbar M, Akbar MD. The role of reactive oxygen species in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Huntington's disease: a mini review. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:8590578. doi: 10.1155/2016/8590578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Huang WJ, Zhang X, Chen WW. Role of oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease (review). Biomed Rep. 2016;4(5):519‐522. doi: 10.3892/br.2016.630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Bhatt S, Puli L, Patil CR. Role of reactive oxygen species in the progression of Alzheimer's disease. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(3):794‐803. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Dusek P, Hofer T, Alexander J, Roos PM, Aaseth JO. Cerebral iron deposition in neurodegeneration. Biomolecules. 2022;12(5):714. doi: 10.3390/biom12050714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Tao Y, Wang Y, Rogers JT, Wang F. Perturbed iron distribution in Alzheimer's disease serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and selected brain regions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(2):679‐690. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Tran D, DiGiacomo P, Born DE, Georgiadis M, Zeineh M. Iron and Alzheimer's disease: from pathology to imaging. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:838692. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.838692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Ma H, Dong Y, Chu Y, Guo Y, Li L. The mechanisms of ferroptosis and its role in Alzheimer's disease. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:965064. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.965064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Hamer M, Batty GD. Association of body mass index and waist‐to‐hip ratio with brain structure. Neurology. 2019;92(6):e594‐e600. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Raiko JRH, Tuulari JJ, Saari T, et al. Associations between brain gray matter volumes and adipose tissue metabolism in healthy adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021;29(3):543‐549. doi: 10.1002/oby.23094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Pflanz CP, Tozer DJ, Harshfield EL, Tay J, Farooqi S, Markus HS. Central obesity is selectively associated with cerebral gray matter atrophy in 15,634 subjects in the UK biobank. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022;46(5):1059‐1067. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00992-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Chen L, Zhao S, Wang Y, et al. Genetic insights into obesity and brain: combine mendelian randomization study and gene expression analysis. Brain Sci. 2023;13(6):892. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Dye L, Boyle NB, Champ C, Lawton C. The relationship between obesity and cognitive health and decline. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017;76(4):443‐454. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117002014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Fernández‐Andújar M, Morales‐García E, García‐Casares N. Obesity and gray matter volume assessed by neuroimaging: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2021;11(8):999. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11080999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Prickett C, Brennan L, Stolwyk R. Examining the relationship between obesity and cognitive function: a systematic literature review. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2015;9(2):93‐113. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2014.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Cook RL, O'Dwyer NJ, Donges CE, et al. Relationship between obesity and cognitive function in young women: the food, mood and mind study. J Obes. 2017;2017:e5923862. doi: 10.1155/2017/5923862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Tremmel M, Gerdtham UG, Nilsson PM, Saha S. Economic burden of obesity: a systematic literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(4):435. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Neto A, Fernandes A, Barateiro A. The complex relationship between obesity and neurodegenerative diseases: an updated review. Front Cell Neurosci. 2023;17:1294420. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2023.1294420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Nguyen TT, Hulme J, Vo TK, Van Vo G. The potential crosstalk between the brain and visceral adipose tissue in Alzheimer's development. Neurochem Res. 2022;47(6):1503‐1512. doi: 10.1007/s11064-022-03569-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Neeland IJ, Ayers CR, Rohatgi AK, et al. Associations of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with markers of cardiac and metabolic risk in obese adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(9):E439‐E447. doi: 10.1002/oby.20135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Carpentier AC, Blondin DP, Virtanen KA, Richard D, Haman F, Turcotte ÉE. Brown adipose tissue energy metabolism in humans. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:447. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Wibmer AG, Becher T, Eljalby M, et al. Brown adipose tissue is associated with healthier body fat distribution and metabolic benefits independent of regional adiposity. CR Med. 2021;2(7):100332. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Boccara E, Golan S, Beeri MS. The association between regional adiposity, cognitive function, and dementia‐related brain changes: a systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1160426. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1160426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. McGuire MJ, Ishii M. Leptin dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease: evidence from cellular, animal, and human studies. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2016;36(2):203‐217. doi: 10.1007/s10571-015-0282-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Sun Z, Wang ZT, Sun FR, et al. Late‐life obesity is a protective factor for prodromal Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study. Aging. 2020;12(2):2005‐2017. doi: 10.18632/aging.102738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Ausk KJ, Ioannou GN. Is obesity associated with anemia of chronic disease? A population‐based study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(10):2356‐2361. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Aigner E, Feldman A, Datz C. Obesity as an emerging risk factor for iron deficiency. Nutrients. 2014;6(9):3587‐3600. doi: 10.3390/nu6093587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Moreno‐Navarrete JM, Moreno M, Puig J, et al. Hepatic iron content is independently associated with serum hepcidin levels in subjects with obesity. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(5):1434‐1439. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Hinojosa‐Moscoso A, Motger‐Albertí A, De la Calle‐Vargas E, et al. The longitudinal changes in subcutaneous abdominal tissue and visceral adipose tissue volumetries are associated with iron status. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4750. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Kerkadi A, Mohsen Ali R, Shehada AH, et al. Association between central obesity indices and iron status indicators among Qatari adults. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Ly M, Yu GZ, Mian A, et al. Neuroinflammation: a modifiable pathway linking obesity, Alzheimer's disease, and depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023;31(10):853‐866. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Han J, Plummer J, Liu L, Byrd A, Aschner M, Erikson KM. The impact of obesity on brain iron levels and α‐synuclein expression is regionally dependent. Nutr Neurosci. 2019;22(5):335‐343. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2017.1387720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Alshwaiyat NM, Ahmad A, Wan Hassan WMR, Al‐Jamal HAN. Association between obesity and iron deficiency (review). Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(5):1268. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Harrison AV, Lorenzo FR, McClain DA. Iron and the pathophysiology of diabetes. Annu Rev Physiol. 2023;85:339‐362. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022522-102832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Iwasaki T, Nakajima A, Yoneda M, et al. Serum ferritin is associated with visceral fat area and subcutaneous fat area. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10):2486‐2491. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Moreno‐Navarrete JM, Novelle MG, Catalán V, et al. Insulin resistance modulates iron‐related proteins in adipose tissue. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(4):1092‐1100. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Ding X, Bian N, Wang J, et al. Serum ferritin levels are associated with adipose tissue dysfunction‐related indices in obese adults. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2023;201(2):636‐643. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03198-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Gabrielsen JS, Gao Y, Simcox JA, et al. Adipocyte iron regulates adiponectin and insulin sensitivity. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(10):3529‐3540. doi: 10.1172/JCI44421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Dongiovanni P, Ruscica M, Rametta R, et al. Dietary iron overload induces visceral adipose tissue insulin resistance. Am J Pathol. 2013;182(6):2254‐2263. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Moreno‐Navarrete JM, Ortega F, Moreno M, Ricart W, Fernández‐Real JM. Fine‐tuned iron availability is essential to achieve optimal adipocyte differentiation and mitochondrial biogenesis. Diabetologia. 2014;57(9):1957‐1967. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3298-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Zhang Z, Funcke JB, Zi Z, et al. Adipocyte iron levels impinge on a fat‐gut cross‐talk to regulate intestinal lipid absorption and mediate protection from obesity. Cell Metab. 2021;33(8):1624‐1639.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Picó C, Palou M, Pomar CA, Rodríguez AM, Palou A. Leptin as a key regulator of the adipose organ. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022;23(1):13‐30. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09687-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Recinella L, Orlando G, Ferrante C, Chiavaroli A, Brunetti L, Leone S. Adipokines: new potential therapeutic target for obesity and metabolic, rheumatic, and cardiovascular diseases. Front Physiol. 2020;11:578966. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.578966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Feijóo‐Bandín S, Aragón‐Herrera A, Moraña‐Fernández S, et al. Adipokines and inflammation: focus on cardiovascular diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7711. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Pessin J, Kwon H. Adipokines mediate inflammation and insulin resistance. Front Endocrinol. 2013;4:4. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2013.00071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Kim S, Yi HA, Won KS, Lee JS, Kim HW. Association between visceral adipose tissue metabolism and Alzheimer's disease pathology. Metabolites. 2022;12(3):258. doi: 10.3390/metabo12030258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Huang X, Wang YJ, Xiang Y. Bidirectional communication between brain and visceral white adipose tissue: its potential impact on Alzheimer's disease. EBioMedicine. 2022;84:104263. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Longo M, Zatterale F, Naderi J, et al. Adipose tissue dysfunction as determinant of obesity‐associated metabolic complications. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2358. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Wilcox G. Insulin and insulin resistance. Clin Biochem Rev. 2005;26(2):19‐39. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1204764/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Li M, Chi X, Wang Y, Setrerrahmane S, Xie W, Xu H. Trends in insulin resistance: insights into mechanisms and therapeutic strategy. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):1‐25. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01073-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Chung JY, Kim HS, Song J. Iron metabolism in diabetes‐induced Alzheimer's disease: a focus on insulin resistance in the brain. Biometals. 2018;31(5):705‐714. doi: 10.1007/s10534-018-0134-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. James JV, Varghese J, John NM, et al. Insulin resistance and adipose tissue inflammation induced by a high‐fat diet are attenuated in the absence of hepcidin. J Nutr Biochem. 2023;111:109175. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2022.109175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Cui Y, Tang TY, Lu CQ, Ju S. Insulin resistance and cognitive impairment: evidence from neuroimaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;56(6):1621‐1649. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Arnold SE, Arvanitakis Z, Macauley‐Rambach SL, et al. Brain insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer disease: concepts and conundrums. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(3):168‐181. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Hnilicova P, Kantorova E, Sutovsky S, et al. Imaging methods applicable in the diagnostics of Alzheimer's disease, considering the involvement of insulin resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):3325. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Millet B, Mouchabac S, Robert G, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the precuneus in Alzheimer's disease: a literature review. Brain Sci. 2023;13(9):1332. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Mörwald K, Aigner E, Bergsten P, et al. Serum ferritin correlates with liver fat in male adolescents with obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:340. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Weinstein G, Davis‐Plourde K, Himali JJ, Zelber‐Sagi S, Beiser AS, Seshadri S. Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver fibrosis score and cognitive function in middle‐aged adults: the Framingham study. Liver Int. 2019;39(9):1713‐1721. doi: 10.1111/liv.14161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Gustafson DR, Luchsinger JA. High adiposity: risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer's disease? Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013;5(6):57. doi: 10.1186/alzrt221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Ravona‐Springer R, Schnaider‐Beeri M, Goldbourt U. Body weight variability in midlife and risk for dementia in old age. Neurology. 2013;80(18):1677‐1683. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182904cee [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Pedditzi E, Peters R, Beckett N. The risk of overweight/obesity in mid‐life and late life for the development of dementia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies. Age Ageing. 2016;45(1):14‐21. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Fernández‐Real JM, Blasco G, Puig J, et al. Adipose tissue R2* signal is increased in subjects with obesity: a preliminary MRI study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(2):352‐358. doi: 10.1002/oby.21347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Elahi FM, Wang MM, Meschia JF. Cerebral small vessel disease‐related dementia: more questions than answers. Stroke. 2023;54(3):648‐660. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Haller S, Vernooij MW, Kuijer JPA, Larsson EM, Jäger HR, Barkhof F. Cerebral microbleeds: imaging and clinical significance. Radiology. 2018;287(1):11‐28. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Tuladhar AM, Lawrence A, DavidG N, Barrick TR, Markus HS, de Leeuw F. Disruption of rich club organisation in cerebral small vessel disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;38(4):1751‐1766. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Tu J, Yan J, Liu J, Liu D, Wang X, Gao F. Iron deposition in the precuneus is correlated with mild cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral microbleeds: a quantitative susceptibility mapping study. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:944709. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.944709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Uchida Y, Kan H, Sakurai K, et al. Voxel‐based quantitative susceptibility mapping in Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment. Mov Disord. 2019;34(8):1164‐1173. doi: 10.1002/mds.27717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Jia X, Li Y, Ying Y, et al. Effect of corticosubcortical iron deposition on dysfunction in CADASIL is mediated by white matter microstructural damage. Neuroimage Clin. 2023;39:103485. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Dichgans M, Wardlaw J, Smith E, et al. METACOHORTS for the study of vascular disease and its contribution to cognitive decline and neurodegeneration: an initiative of the joint programme for neurodegenerative disease research. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(12):1235‐1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Chabriat H, Lesnik OS. Cognition, mood and behavior in CADASIL. Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2022;3:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Masellis M, Sherborn K, Neto PR, et al. Early‐onset dementias: diagnostic and etiological considerations. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.1186/alzrt197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Buffon F, Porcher R, Hernandez K, et al. Cognitive profile in CADASIL. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(2):175‐180. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.068726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Schoemaker D, Quiroz YT, Torrico‐Teave H, Arboleda‐Velasquez JF. Clinical and research applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the study of CADASIL. Neurosci Lett. 2019;698:173‐179. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Stojanov D, Aracki‐Trenkic A, Vojinovic S, et al. Imaging characteristics of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leucoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2015;15(1):1‐8. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2015.247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Korvatska O, Bucks SA, Yoda RA, et al. NOTCH3 C201R variant causes cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) that can be confused with early‐onset Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2023;452:120763. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Littau JL, Velilla L, Hase Y, et al. Evidence of beta amyloid independent small vessel disease in familial Alzheimer's disease. Brain Pathol. 2022;32(6):e13097. doi: 10.1111/bpa.13097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Sun C, Wu Y, Ling C, et al. Deep gray matter iron deposition and its relationship to clinical features in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy patients. Stroke. 2020;51(6):1750‐1757. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Liem MK, Lesnik Oberstein SAJ, Versluis MJ, et al. 7 T MRI reveals diffuse iron deposition in putamen and caudate nucleus in CADASIL. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(12):1180‐1185. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Uchida Y, Kan H, Sakurai K, et al. Iron leakage owing to blood–brain barrier disruption in small vessel disease CADASIL. Neurology. 2020;95(9):e1188‐e1198. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Kagerer SM, van Bergen JMG, Li X, et al. APOE4 moderates effects of cortical iron on synchronized default mode network activity in cognitively healthy old‐aged adults. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2020;12(1):e12002. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. van Bergen JMG, Li X, Hua J, et al. Colocalization of cerebral iron with amyloid beta in mild cognitive impairment. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35514. doi: 10.1038/srep35514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Uchida Y, Kan H, Sakurai K, et al. APOE ɛ4 dose associates with increased brain iron and β‐amyloid via blood–brain barrier dysfunction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022;93(7):772‐778. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Botha H, Duffy JR, Whitwell JL, et al. Classification and clinicoradiologic features of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and apraxia of speech. Cortex. 2015;69:220‐236. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Crutch SJ, Lehmann M, Warren JD, Rohrer JD. The language profile of posterior cortical atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(4):460‐466. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Dickerson BC, Sperling RA. Large‐scale functional brain network abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease: insights from functional neuroimaging. Behav Neurol. 2009;21(1–2):63‐75. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2009-0227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Andrews‐Hanna JR, Reidler JS, Huang C, Buckner RL. Evidence for the default network's role in spontaneous cognition. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104(1):322‐335. doi: 10.1152/jn.00830.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Yang A, Du L, Gao W, et al. Associations of cortical iron accumulation with cognition and cerebral atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022;12(9):4570‐4586. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Ayton S, Portbury S, Kalinowski P, et al. Regional brain iron associated with deterioration in Alzheimer's disease: a large cohort study and theoretical significance. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(7):1244‐1256. doi: 10.1002/alz.12282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Kenkhuis B, Bush AI, Ayton S. How iron can drive neurodegeneration. Trends Neurosci. 2023;46(5):333‐335. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Bulk M, Kenkhuis B, van der Graaf LM, Goeman JJ, Natté R, van der Weerd L. Postmortem T2*‐ weighted MRI imaging of cortical iron reflects severity of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(4):1125‐1137. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Spotorno N, Acosta‐Cabronero J, Stomrud E, et al. Relationship between cortical iron and tau aggregation in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2020;143(5):1341‐1349. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Ayton S, Wang Y, Diouf I, et al. Brain iron is associated with accelerated cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer pathology. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25(11):2932‐2941. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0375-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Zeineh MM, Chen Y, Kitzler HH, Hammond R, Vogel H, Rutt BK. Activated iron‐containing microglia in the human hippocampus identified by magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(9):2483‐2500. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.05.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Smith MA, Harris PLR, Sayre LM, Perry G. Iron accumulation in Alzheimer disease is a source of redox‐generated free radicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(18):9866‐9868. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC23283/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Gong NJ, Dibb R, Bulk M, van der Weerd L, Liu C. Imaging beta amyloid aggregation and iron accumulation in Alzheimer's disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping MRI. Neuroimage. 2019;191:176‐185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Deibel MA, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR. Copper, iron, and zinc imbalances in severely degenerated brain regions in Alzheimer's disease: possible relation to oxidative stress. J Neurol Sci. 1996;143(1–2):137‐142. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)00203-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Hautot D, Pankhurst QA, Khan N, Dobson J. Preliminary evaluation of nanoscale biogenic magnetite in Alzheimer's disease brain tissue. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(Suppl 1):S62‐S64. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Collingwood JF, Mikhaylova A, Davidson M, et al. In situ characterization and mapping of iron compounds in Alzheimer's disease tissue. J Alzheimers Dis. 2005;7(4):267‐272. doi: 10.3233/jad-2005-7401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. Collingwood JF, Chong RKK, Kasama T, et al. Three‐dimensional tomographic imaging and characterization of iron compounds within Alzheimer's plaque core material. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008;14(2):235‐245. doi: 10.3233/jad-2008-14211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Everett J, Céspedes E, Shelford LR, et al. Ferrous iron formation following the co‐aggregation of ferric iron and the Alzheimer's disease peptide β‐amyloid (1–42). J R Soc Interface. 2014;11(95):20140165. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Christen Y. Oxidative stress and Alzheimer disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(2):621S‐629S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.2.621s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Kenkhuis B, Somarakis A, de Haan L, et al. Iron loading is a prominent feature of activated microglia in Alzheimer's disease patients. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2021;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40478-021-01126-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Cheignon C, Tomas M, Bonnefont‐Rousselot D, Faller P, Hureau C, Collin F. Oxidative stress and the amyloid beta peptide in Alzheimer's disease. Redox Biol. 2018;14:450‐464. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Duce JA, Tsatsanis A, Cater MA, et al. An iron‐export ferroxidase activity of β‐amyloid protein precursor is inhibited by zinc in Alzheimer's disease. Cell. 2010;142(6):857‐867. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Acosta‐Cabronero J, Williams GB, Cardenas‐Blanco A, Arnold RJ, Lupson V, Nestor PJ. In vivo quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e81093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Ayton S, Fazlollahi A, Bourgeat P, et al. Cerebral quantitative susceptibility mapping predicts amyloid‐β‐related cognitive decline. Brain. 2017;140(8):2112‐2119. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Haacke EM, Cheng NYC, House MJ, et al. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;23(1):1‐25. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Ayton S, Faux NG, Bush AI. Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative. Ferritin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid predict Alzheimer's disease outcomes and are regulated by APOE. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6760. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Moon Y, Han SH, Moon WJ. Patterns of brain iron accumulation in vascular dementia and Alzheimer's dementia using quantitative susceptibility mapping imaging. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(3):737‐745. doi: 10.3233/JAD-151037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Rouault TA. Iron metabolism in the CNS: implications for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(8):551‐564. doi: 10.1038/nrn3453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Du L, Zhao Z, Cui A, et al. Increased iron deposition on brain quantitative susceptibility mapping correlates with decreased cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease. ACS Chem Nerosci. 2018;9(7):1849‐1857. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Qiao R, Fu C, Forgham H, et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for brain imaging and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;197:114822. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Jack CR, Garwood M, Wengenack TM, et al. In vivo visualization of Alzheimer's amyloid plaques by MRI in transgenic mice without a contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52(6):1263‐1271. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Meadowcroft MD, Connor JR, Smith MB, Yang QX. Magnetic resonance imaging and histological analysis of beta‐amyloid plaques in both human Alzheimer's disease and APP/PS1 transgenic mice. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29(5):997‐1007. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Carmeli C, Fornari E, Jalili M, Meuli R, Knyazeva MG. Structural covariance of superficial white matter in mild Alzheimer's disease compared to normal aging. Brain Behav. 2014;4(5):721‐737. doi: 10.1002/brb3.252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Lee J, Shmueli K, Kang BT, et al. The contribution of myelin to magnetic susceptibility‐weighted contrasts in high‐field MRI of the brain. Neuroimage. 2012;59(4):3967‐3975. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Zhao Z. Iron and oxidizing species in oxidative stress and Alzheimer's disease. Aging Med (Milton). 2019;2(2):82‐87. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Jiang T, Sun Q, Chen S. Oxidative stress: a major pathogenesis and potential therapeutic target of antioxidative agents in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2016;147:1‐19. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Gao G, You L, Zhang J, Chang YZ, Yu P. Brain iron metabolism, redox balance and neurological diseases. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(6):1289. doi: 10.3390/antiox12061289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. Rao SS, Adlard PA. Untangling tau and iron: exploring the interaction between iron and tau in neurodegeneration. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:276. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. Zhang W, Xiao D, Mao Q, Xia H. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):1‐32. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01486-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Sinsky J, Pichlerova K, Hanes J. Tau protein interaction partners and their roles in Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9207. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Yu Y, Yan Y, Niu F, et al. Ferroptosis: a cell death connecting oxidative stress, inflammation and cardiovascular diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2021;7(1):1‐10. doi: 10.1038/s41420-021-00579-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Dang X, Huan X, Du X, et al. Correlation of ferroptosis and other types of cell death in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurosci Bull. 2022;38(8):938‐952. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00861-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. Sun S, Shen J, Jiang J, Wang F, Min J. Targeting ferroptosis opens new avenues for the development of novel therapeutics. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):1‐30. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01606-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Ge C, Zhang S, Mu H, et al. Emerging mechanisms and disease implications of ferroptosis: potential applications of natural products. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;9:774957. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.774957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Moreno‐Navarrete JM, Ortega F, Moreno M, Serrano M, Ricart W, Fernández‐Real JM. Lactoferrin gene knockdown leads to similar effects to iron chelation in human adipocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18(3):391‐395. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Yan HF, Liu ZY, Guan ZA, Guo C. Deferoxamine ameliorates adipocyte dysfunction by modulating iron metabolism in ob/ob mice. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(4):604‐616. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. Huang S, Li S, Feng H, Chen Y. Iron metabolism disorders for cognitive dysfunction after mild traumatic brain injury. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:587197. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.587197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241. Wengenack TM, Reyes DA, Curran GL, et al. Regional differences in MRI detection of amyloid plaques in AD transgenic mouse brain. Neuroimage. 2011;54(1):113‐122. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242. van Bergen JMG, Li X, Quevenco FC, et al. Simultaneous quantitative susceptibility mapping and flutemetamol‐PET suggests local correlation of iron and β‐amyloid as an indicator of cognitive performance at high age. Neuroimage. 2018;174:308‐316. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243. Tiepolt S, Schäfer A, Rullmann M, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of amyloid‐β aggregates in Alzheimer's disease with 7T MR. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(2):393‐404. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244. Zhao Z, Zhang L, Wen Q, et al. The effect of beta‐amyloid and tau protein aggregations on magnetic susceptibility of anterior hippocampal laminae in Alzheimer's diseases. Neuroimage. 2021;244:118584. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245. Ahmed M, Chen J, Arani A, et al. The diamagnetic component map from quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) source separation reveals pathological alteration in Alzheimer's disease‐driven neurodegeneration. Neuroimage. 2023;280:120357. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246. Kim J, Wessling‐Resnick M. Iron and mechanisms of emotional behavior. J Nutr Biochem. 2014;25(11):1101‐1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247. McCann S, Perapoch Amadó M, Moore SE. The role of iron in brain development: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):2001. doi: 10.3390/nu12072001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248. Granziera C, Wuerfel J, Barkhof F, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging towards clinical application in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2021;144(5):1296‐1311. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249. van der Weijden CWJ, Biondetti E, Gutmann IW, et al. Quantitative myelin imaging with MRI and PET: an overview of techniques and their validation status. Brain. 2022;146(4):1243‐1266. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250. Gaeta M, Cavallaro M, Vinci SL, et al. Magnetism of materials: theory and practice in magnetic resonance imaging. Insights Imaging. 2021;12:179. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01125-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251. Nikparast F, Ganji Z, Danesh Doust M, Faraji R, Zare H. Brain pathological changes during neurodegenerative diseases and their identification methods: how does QSM perform in detecting this process? Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01207-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252. Madden DJ, Merenstein JL. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of brain iron in healthy aging and cognition. Neuroimage. 2023;282:120401. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253. Ndayisaba A, Kaindlstorfer C, Wenning GK. Iron in neurodegeneration – cause or consequence? Front Neurosci. 2019;13:180. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254. Deistung A, Schweser F, Reichenbach JR. Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3569. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255. Tiepolt S, Rullmann M, Jochimsen TH, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping in β‐amyloid PET‐stratified patients with dementia and healthy controls – a hybrid PET/MRI study. Eur J Radiol. 2020;131:109243. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256. Hallgren B, Sourander P. The effect of age on the non‐haemin iron in the human brain. J Neurochem. 1958;3(1):41‐51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1958.tb12607.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257. Ruetten PPR, Gillard JH, Graves MJ. Introduction to quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility weighted imaging. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1101):20181016. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20181016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258. Li Z, Feng R, Liu Q, et al. APART‐QSM: an improved sub‐voxel quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation using an iterative data fitting method. Neuroimage. 2023;274:120148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259. Kan H, Kasai H, Arai N, Kunitomo H, Hirose Y, Shibamoto Y. Background field removal technique using regularization enabled sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data with varying kernel sizes. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34(7):1026‐1033. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.04.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260. Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YCN, Reichenbach JR. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med. 2004;52(3):612‐618. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261. Liu S, Buch S, Chen Y, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging: current status and future directions. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3552. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262. Haacke EM, Liu S, Buch S, Zheng W, Wu D, Ye Y. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(1):1‐25. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263. Kim S, Lee Y, Jeon CY, et al. Quantitative magnetic susceptibility assessed by 7T magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer's disease caused by streptozotocin administration. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020;10(3):789‐797. doi: 10.21037/qims.2020.02.08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264. Ghaderi S, Batouli SAH, Mohammadi S, Fatehi F. Iron quantification in basal ganglia using quantitative susceptibility mapping in a patient with ALS: a case report and literature review. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1229082. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1229082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265. O'Callaghan J, Holmes H, Powell N, et al. Tissue magnetic susceptibility mapping as a marker of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2017;159:334‐345. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266. QSM Consensus Organization Committee , Bilgic B, Costagli M, et al. Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: a consensus of the ISMRM electro‐magnetic tissue properties study group. Magn Reson Med. 2024;91:1834‐1862. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267. Zhu WZ, de Zhong W, Wang W, et al. Quantitative MR phase‐corrected imaging to investigate increased brain iron deposition of patients with Alzheimer disease. Radiology. 2009;253(2):497‐504. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532082324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268. Thal DR, Rüb U, Orantes M, Braak H. Phases of a beta‐deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology. 2002;58(12):1791‐1800. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.12.1791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269. van Rooden S, Doan NT, Versluis MJ, et al. 7T T2*‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging reveals cortical phase differences between early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(1):20‐26. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270. Tatewaki Y, Mutoh T, Thyreau B, et al. Phase difference‐enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (PADRE) technique for the detection of age‐related microstructural changes in optic radiation: comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:5495‐5503. doi: 10.12659/MSM.905571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271. Takita H, Doishita S, Yoneda T, et al. Correlation between phase‐difference‐enhanced MR imaging and amyloid positron emission tomography: a study on Alzheimer's disease patients and Normal controls. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2023;22(1):67‐78. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272. Ide S, Kakeda S, Korogi Y, et al. Delineation of optic radiation and stria of Gennari on high‐resolution phase difference enhanced imaging. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(10):1283‐1289. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273. Tateishi M, Kitajima M, Hirai T, et al. Differentiating between Alzheimer disease patients and controls with phase‐difference‐enhanced imaging at 3T: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2018;17(4):283‐292. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2017-0134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274. Miyakawa T, Kimura T, Hirata S, et al. Role of blood vessels in producing pathological changes in the brain with Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;903:46‐54. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06349.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275. Eskreis‐Winkler S, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al. The clinical utility of QSM: disease diagnosis, medical management, and surgical planning. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3668. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276. Jiang D, Lin Z, Liu P, et al. Brain oxygen extraction is differentially altered by Alzheimer's and vascular diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;52(6):1829‐1837. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277. Kudo K, Liu T, Murakami T, et al. Oxygen extraction fraction measurement using quantitative susceptibility mapping: comparison with positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(8):1424‐1433. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15606713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278. Uchida Y, Kan H, Inoue H, et al. Penumbra detection with oxygen extraction fraction using magnetic susceptibility in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2022;13:752450. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.752450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Aging Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES