Table 3. Decomposition results for inequality in dyslipidaemia components.
Dyslipidaemia components | Marginal effect* | Elasticity | CIk | Contribution | % | Summed % |
Hypercholesterolaemia | ||||||
Age <50 | −0.490 | −0.959 | 0.094 | −0.090 | 10.76 | 10.76 |
Female | 0.018 | 0.030 | −0.196 | −0.006 | 7.170 | 7.170 |
Poor | −0.250 | −0.158 | −0.399 | 0.063 | −75.26 | 322.11 |
Middle | −0.407 | −0.257 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.030 | |
Rich | −0.387 | −0.245 | 0.400 | −0.098 | 116.36 | |
The richest | −0.468 | −0.296 | 0.800 | −0.237 | 280.98 | |
Hypertriglyceridaemia | ||||||
Age <50 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.094 | 0.000 | −0.060 | −0.060 |
Female | −0.795 | −1.309 | −0.196 | 0.256 | 814.05 | 814.05 |
Poor | −0.043 | −0.027 | −0.399 | 0.011 | 34.860 | −457.15 |
Middle | −0.108 | −0.068 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −0.020 | |
Rich | −0.129 | −0.082 | 0.400 | −0.032 | −104.10 | |
The richest | −0.241 | −0.152 | 0.800 | −0.122 | −387.89 | |
Hyper-LDL | ||||||
Age <50 | −0.511 | −1.238 | 0.094 | −0.117 | 146.07 | 146.07 |
Female | −0.044 | −0.092 | −0.196 | 0.017 | −22.081 | −22.081 |
Poor | −0.175 | −0.138 | −0.399 | 0.055 | −68.785 | 400.14 |
Middle | −0.322 | −0.253 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.032 | |
Rich | −0.273 | −0.214 | 0.400 | −0.085 | 106.92 | |
The richest | −0.462 | −0.363 | 0.800 | −0.290 | 361.98 | |
Hypo-HDL | ||||||
Age <50 | 0.194 | 0.244 | 0.094 | 0.023 | 132.45 | 132.45 |
Female | 0.518 | 0.547 | −0.196 | −0.107 | −615.26 | −615.26 |
Poor | 0.231 | 0.094 | −0.399 | −0.0377 | −215.98 | 473.07 |
Middle | 0.313 | 0.127 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.074 | |
Rich | 0.269 | 0.109 | 0.400 | 0.043 | 251.47 | |
The richest | 0.234 | 0.095 | 0.800 | 0.076 | 437.51 |
Marginal effects from the probit model; Aadjusted for BMIbody mass index, WHtRwaist-to-height ratio, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and comorbidities.
CIkconcentration index for the predictor variablesHDLhigh-density lipoproteinLDLlow-density lipoprotein