Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 20;55(5):1322–1328. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.12182/20240960603

表 2. Artificial intelligence models for sperm screening.

用于精子筛选的人工智能模型

Source Time Model Target Sperm observation method Performance
 CNN: convolutional neural network; SVM: support vector machine; HE: hematoxylin-eosin staining; MAE: mean absolute error.
ILHAN H O, et al.[19] 2020 CNN Morphology HE staining The highest accuracy rate reached 87%.
MIRSKY S K, et al.[23] 2017 SVM Morphology Interference microscope The precision exceeded 90%.
RIORDON J, et al.[24] 2019 CNN Morphology HuSHeM, SCIAN dataset The accuracy rate reached 94.1% (HuSHeM)
 and 62.0% (SCIAN).
JAVADI S, et al.[18] 2019 CNN Morphology MHSMA dataset The accuracy rate reached 84.74% (acrosome),
 83.86% (head), and 94.65% (vacuole).
NOY L, et al.[25] 2023 CNN DNA Acridine orange staining The MAE was 0.05.
McCALLUM C, et al.[21] 2019 CNN DNA Acridine orange staining The accuracy rate for prediction in 10 ms reached 86%.
WANG Y, et al.[20] 2019 Regression model DNA Acridine orange staining The accuracy rate reached 82.7%.
VALIUŠKAITĖ V, et al.[26] 2020 R-CNN Movement VISEM database The accuracy rate reached 91.77% and the MAE was 2.92.
HICKS S A, et al.[27] 2019 CNN Movement VISEM database The lowest MAE was 8.786.
GOODSON S G, et al.[28] 2017 SVM Movement CASA analysis The accuracy rate was 89.9%.
LEE R, et al.[29] 2022 U-Net Testicular sperm
 sampling
LIVE/DEAD fixable aqua
 dead cell staining
The sensitivity was 86.1% and the F1 score was 85.2%.