Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 5;6:58. doi: 10.1186/s42836-024-00278-8

Table 2.

Comparison of cup positioning (inclination and anteversion) between both sides

Group A (n = 210)
(dominant, right THA)
Group B (n = 210)
(nondominant, left THA)
P-Value
Inclination (in degrees)
Mean ± SD 40.1 ± 6.3 (21.8–60.3) 38.2 ± 6.1 (23.4–63.4) 0.002*
Lewinnek et al
▪  Within safe zone (30–50) 189 (90.0%) 187 (89.0%) 0.750**
▪  Outside safe zone 21 (10.0%) 23 (11.0%)
Callanan et al
▪  Within safe zone (30–45) 155 (73.8%) 164 (78.1%) 0.304
▪  Outside safe zone 55 (26.2%) 46 (21.9%)
Anteversion (in degrees)
Mean ± SD 11.7 ± 4.4 (2.0–26.8) 11.8 ± 4.7 (2.0–27.1) 0.950*
▪  Within safe zone (5–25) 198 (94.3%) 194 (92.4%) 0.434**
▪  Outside safe zone 12 (5.7%) 16 (7.6%)

Data were expressed as frequency and % or mean ± SD (range); Bold P-value indicates statistically significant

*Independent Sample T-test compares the mean difference between both groups

**Chi-square test compares proportions between both groups