A-E. Conformational heterogeneity of the LBD gating
ring in Open-Na260. A. LBD-TMD sectors were reconstructed from
particles that produced LBD Conf1, Conf2, and Conf3. The LBD-TMD were
aligned and superimposed using the cytoplasmic half of the SF. The TMD and
γ2(KKEE) are nearly perfectly aligned as expected; there was no
obvious global conformational heterogeneity of the TMD and γ2(KKEE).
Blue=Conf1, Yellow=Conf2, and Red=Conf3. The rectangle indicates the regions
that are highlighted in panels C-E. B. The LBD gating ring of
the aligned and superimposed structure shown in panel A is viewed from
above. The helices of the LBDs do not superimpose. C.
Conformational transition from Conf1 to Conf2. The Conf1 conformation is
shown with the mode vectors (yellow arrows) that schematically represent the
displacements of the Cα during the conformational transition from
Conf1 to Conf2 (panel C1). The lengths of the vectors are increased by 50%
than actual displacements for clarity. The Conf1 and Conf2 conformations are
superimposed in the same view as in panel C1. D and E. The
transition from Conf1 to Conf3 (panels D1 and D2) and from Conf2 to Conf3
(panels E1 and E2) are shown as in panel C. F-N. Global
architecture of A2iQ/γ-2(KKEE). F and G. The atomic
model of Open-CaNaMg at 2.4Å resolution, where γ2(KKEE) in
teal and GluA2 in orange, is superimposed to the A2iQ/γ2 wild-type
complex in yellow (PDB:6dlz, 3.9Å resolution). The root mean square
deviation (RMSD) of the Cα is 1.909Å. Top view (A) and cross
section side view (B). H. The pore (i.e., M2, SF, and M3) of
Open-Na260 at 2.3Å resolution is superimposed to the A2iQ/γ2
wild-type complex in yellow (PDB:5vot, 4.9Å resolution). The RMSD of
Cα of the M3 in B/D subunit pairs is 0.642Å. I.
Conformational difference between Closed-CaNaMg and Open-CaNaMg. The two
structures were aligned at the cytoplasmic half of M3 (residue 597-610) at
RMSD=0.3Å. GluA2 are colored in ogrange and light orange in
Open-CaNaMg and Closed-CaNaMg, respectively. The four γ2(KKEE)s of
Open-CaNaMg are colored in teal, while in Closed-CaNaMg they are in light
green. The position of the γ2(KKEE)s relative to the GluA2 are
indicated by the A’-D’ labels, as defined in Fig1B. The γ2(KKEE)s undergo counter
rotations of 2-3° within the A’/B’ and
C’/D’ pairs (curved arrows). The eye and arrow indicate the
viewpoint of the structures in J-K. J. Closed-CaNaMg without
the mode vector arrows. K. Closed-CaNaMg with the mode vector
arrows that describe the directions and magnitudes of displacement of the
Cα between Closed-CaNaMg and Open-CaNaMg. Arrows are shown for all
motion greater than 0.5Å. The counter rotation of the
γ2(KKEE)s in the A’/B’ pairs are shown. L.
Superposition of the Open-CaNaMg and Closed-CaNaMg shows the
~2Å outward motion of the extracellular domain of the TARPs.
M and N. The activation is also accompanied by a
2-3° tilt of the TARPs, which brings close the cytoplasmic extension
of TM4 of γ2(KKEE) to the base of M1-M2 loop of GluA2. In the
magnified view (I), the difference in the tilt angle in TM1 and TM4 of
γ2(KKEE) is shown.