Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Dyslexia. 2011 Jan 7;61(1):111–135. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0050-9

Table 2.

Multiple regressions: predicting reading fluency and spelling outcomes with OVST efficiency

Reading skill Test point OVST latency-trained confusable
OVST accuracy-trained confusable
β r β r
Oral fluency—words TOWRE sight word Time 1 −0.102 −0.085 0.113 0.113
Time 2 −0.067 −0.056 0.091 0.089
Oral fluency—passages GORT-4 rate Time 1  −0.286* −0.235 0.132 0.131
Time 2 0.082 0.067 0.165 0.163
Silent fluency—sentences WJIII reading fluency Time 1 −0.264 −0.233 0.213 0.207
Time 2 0.006 −0.054 0.056 0.054
Spelling—recognition PIAT-spelling Time 1 0.053 0.041 −0.034 −0.034
Time 2 0.067 0.052 −0.051 −0.048
Spelling—from dictation WJIII spelling Time 1 −0.025 −0.019 0.114 0.110
Time 2 −0.019 −0.015 0.092 0.090

OVST latency and accuracy were entered into separate regression analyses as predictors of end of year scores on reading fluency and spelling measures. Predictors in each model included an autoregressor (i.e., pretest scores on the reading or spelling measures) and time 1 and time 2 OVST measures from searches with trained targets in visually confusable arrays. Beta values (β) and semi-partial correlation coefficients (r) are presented for each predictor within each model

*

p<0.05, significant change in R2 due to the predictor