Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 30;11(9):2450–2456. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52161

Table 3.

Association between ipsilateral CW and recurrent ischemic stroke and LVO.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Unadjusted RR (95% CI) 1 P‐value Adjusted OR (95% CI) 1 P‐value Unadjusted OR (95% CI) 2 P‐value Adjusted OR (95% CI) 2 P‐value
Recurrent ischemic stroke 6.13 (1.98–19.05) <0.001 4.38 (1.38–13.85) 0.012 8.72 (2.89–26.35) <0.001 5.64 (1.78–17.89) <0.001
Recurrent LVO in Hospital 6.37 (2.04–19.84) <0.001 4.49 (1.41–14.21) 0.01 9.6 (3.71–22.08) <0.001 5.76 (1.81–18.30) <0.001
1

Models 1 & 2 are unadjusted and adjusted models (age) respectively.

2

Models 3 (unadjusted) & 4 (adjusted for age) represents sensitivity analysis for patients with ipsilateral CW and no competing mechanism. LVO indicates large vessel occlusion and RR indicates relative risk.