Table 1.
Outlet app | Exit Interview | |
---|---|---|
Number of observations | Encounters recorded*: 54,255 | Clients screened*: 11,783 |
Ineligibility criteria** | ||
Client not present | 4,095 (7.5%) | 3,578 (30.4%) |
Not known if client present | 356 (0.7%) | NA |
Already started antimalarials | NA | 1,293 (11.0%) |
Excluded other criteria | NA | 960 (6.0%) |
Not consented | NA | 256 (2.2%) |
Incomplete survey | NA | 1 (<0.001%) |
Eligible for current analysis (i.e. client present and no other exclusion criteria) | 49,804 (91.8%) | 5,695 (48.3%) |
Gender of client (n, %) - Those included in the current analysis | ||
Male | 24,639 (49.5%) | 3,016 (53.0%) |
Female | 25,165 (50.5%) | 2,679 (47.0%) |
Age of client (n, %)- Those included in the current analysis | ||
1–17 years | 17,510 (35.2%) | 1,750 (30.7%) |
18–25 years | 9,950 (20.0%) | 613 (10.8%) |
26–39 years | 13,499 (27.1%) | 1,330 (23.3%) |
40–59 years | 7,375 (14.8%) | 1,503 (26.4%) |
60 years and above | 1,470 (3.0%) | 490 (8.6%) |
Missing | 0 | 9 (0.16%) |
Tested at outlet by mRDT(n, %) | ||
Yes | 25446 (51.1%) | 2436 (42.8%) |
Note that these may not be unique individuals – an individual may have more than one encounter if they returned to the outlet with malaria-like symptoms during the study period.
Note that multiple reasons may apply for ineligibility for inclusion in analysis of the exit interview data.